Copyright 2002 Journal Sentinel Inc. Milwaukee
Journal Sentinel (Wisconsin)
April 18, 2002 Thursday FINAL EDITION Correction Appended
SECTION: BUSINESS; Pg.
03D
LENGTH: 696 words
HEADLINE: Ruling on cable modems could cost local governments
millions
BYLINE: ANNYSA JOHNSON of the Journal
Sentinel staff
BODY: A ruling by the
Federal Communications Commission that changes the way it defines cable modems
has unleashed a torrent of criticism from a broad spectrum of interests in
Wisconsin and the nation.
From local governments that
stand to lose millions in franchise fees to Internet advocates worried about the
future of the medium, critics are lining up to be heard in a debate that might
make its way to the U.S. Supreme Court.
After years of
discussion, the FCC issued a ruling in March redefining cable modems -- the
high-speed technology that connects cable customers to the Internet -- as an
"information service" rather than a cable or telecommunications service.
As part of that ruling, it began soliciting public comment
on a number of related questions.
But the move,
essentially de-regulating cable modem service, carries far-reaching implications
for consumers and competitors, industry observers say.
"This essentially takes cable modem service and puts it into an area
that nobody regulates," said Barry Orton, a telecommunications professor at the
University of Wisconsin-Madison and a consultant to local governments on
telecommunications issues.
"And that's a problem for
consumers because it means they have nowhere to go for recourse," he said.
Communities to take a hit
At the
national level, consumer groups and two competitors have appealed the FCC ruling
in a case now before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco.
That could take years to resolve, but in the meantime,
local governments will feel the pinch.
Time Warner
Cable, which serves residents in southeastern Wisconsin and the Green Bay area,
has notified municipalities that it will no longer collect from customers and
pass along to municipalities franchise fees based on its Road Runner high-speed
Internet service.
Mark Harrad, a spokesman for the $1.4
billion provider based in Stamford, Conn., called the decision positive for
consumers, saying they should see their bills drop accordingly.
But Wisconsin municipalities, already bracing for massive state funding
cuts, say it will be difficult to weather.
Milwaukee
alone stands to lose $345,000 in 2003 and millions over the next decade as
demand for cable-based Internet service grows, City Clerk Ron Leonhardt said.
Brookfield would lose about $24,000 over the next year,
Wauwatosa $30,000 -- some of that already budgeted for the current year,
officials in those cities said.
Brookfield has
registered a complaint with the FCC and has asked Time Warner to maintain its
records during the appeals process in a way that will let cities collect what
they're due should the courts set aside the federal agency's ruling, City Clerk
Chris Schmidt said.
Lack of competition
Though the loss of revenue is significant, particularly as high-speed
Internet use spreads, that's hardly the most important issue, critics said.
"The money is important. But the real issue here is the
lack of competition," said Bob Chernow, chairman of the Regional
Telecommunications Commission, which represents 28 communities in southeastern
Wisconsin.
"And we've seen what happens when there's no
competition in an area," he said.
In its statement
announcing the ruling, the FCC said the decision would promote the spread of
"broadband," or high-speed Internet services.
But opponents say the ruling will do just the opposite.
By declaring cable modems an information service, they say, the FCC
exempts cable companies from the open-access requirements that
force telecommunication providers to open their platforms to competitors.
That, they say, gives cable companies an unfair advantage
over telephone companies and small Internet service providers that offer similar
services, and strengthens their ability to control Internet access and
content.
"Without non-discriminatory open
access, cable operators retain the legal right to censor messages, to limit
the size and nature of files . . . and to favor content provided by their
commercial partners and preferred vendors," Andrew Jay Schwartzman, president of
the Washington-based Media Access Project, said in a statement.
CORRECTION-DATE: April 20, 2002
CORRECTION: Because of incorrect
information supplied by Time Warner Cable, the company's annual revenue for 2001
was misstated Thursday in the Business section. The revenue for 2001 was $7
billion, not $1.4 billion.