THIS SEARCH     THIS DOCUMENT     THIS CR ISSUE     GO TO
Next Hit        Forward           Next Document     New CR Search
Prev Hit        Back              Prev Document     HomePage
Hit List        Best Sections     Daily Digest      Help
                Contents Display    

STATEMENTS ON INTRODUCED BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS -- (Senate - June 28, 2001)

In this Act:

[Page: S7092]  GPO's PDF

    (1) BEAR VISCERA.--The term ``bear viscera'' means the body fluids or internal organs, including the gallbladder and its contents but not including the blood or brains, of a species of bear .

    (2) CITES.--The term ``CITES'' means the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (27 UST 1087; TIAS 8249).

    (3) IMPORT.--The term ``import'' means to land on, bring into, or introduce into any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, regardless of whether the landing, bringing, or introduction constitutes an importation within the meaning of the customs laws of the United States.

    (4) PERSON.--The term ``person'' means--

    (A) an individual, corporation, partnership, trust, association, or other private entity;

    (B) an officer, employee, agent, department, or instrumentality of--

    (i) the Federal Government;

    (ii) any State or political subdivision of a State; or

    (iii) any foreign government; and

    (C) any other entity subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

    (5) SECRETARY.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the Interior.

    (6) STATE.--The term ``State'' means a State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, and any other territory, commonwealth, or possession of the United States.

    (7) TRANSPORT.--The term ``transport'' means to move, convey, carry, or ship by any means, or to deliver or receive for the purpose of movement, conveyance, carriage, or shipment.

   SEC. 5. PROHIBITED ACTS.

    (a) IN GENERAL.--Except as provided in subsection (b), a person shall not--

    (1) import into, or export from, the United States bear viscera or any product, item, or substance containing, or labeled or advertised as containing, bear viscera; or

    (2) sell or barter, offer to sell or barter, purchase, possess, transport, deliver, or receive, in interstate or foreign commerce, bear viscera or any product, item, or substance containing, or labeled or advertised as containing, bear viscera.

    (b) EXCEPTION FOR WILDLIFE LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES.--A person described in section 4(4)(B) may import into, or export from, the United States, or transport between States, bear viscera or any product, item, or substance containing, or labeled or advertised as containing, bear viscera if the importation, exportation, or transportation--

    (1) is solely for the purpose of enforcing laws relating to the protection of wildlife; and

    (2) is authorized by a valid permit issued under Appendix I or II of CITES, in any case in which such a permit is required under CITES.

   SEC. 6. PENALTIES AND ENFORCEMENT.

    (a) CRIMINAL PENALTIES.--A person that knowingly violates section 5 shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both.

    (b) CIVIL PENALTIES.--

    (1) AMOUNT.--A person that knowingly violates section 5 may be assessed a civil penalty by the Secretary of not more than $25,000 for each violation.

    (2) MANNER OF ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION.--A civil penalty under this subsection shall be assessed, and may be collected, in the manner in which a civil penalty under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 may be assessed and collected under section 11(a) of that Act (16 U.S.C. 1540(a)).

    (c) SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE.--Any bear viscera or any product, item, or substance imported, exported, sold, bartered, attempted to be imported, exported, sold, or bartered, offered for sale or barter, purchased, possessed, transported, delivered, or received in violation of this section (including any regulation issued under this section) shall be seized and forfeited to the United States.

    (d) REGULATIONS.--After consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the United States Trade Representative, the Secretary shall issue such regulations as are necessary to carry out this section.

    (e) ENFORCEMENT.--The Secretary, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall enforce this section in the manner in which the Secretaries carry out enforcement activities under section 11(e) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1540(e)).

    (f) USE OF PENALTY AMOUNTS.--Amounts received as penalties, fines, or forfeiture of property under this section shall be used in accordance with section 6(d) of the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 (16 U.S.C. 3375(d)).

   SEC. 7. DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING BEAR CONSERVATION AND THE BEAR PARTS TRADE.

    In order to seek to establish coordinated efforts with other countries to protect bears, the Secretary shall continue discussions concerning trade in bear viscera with--

    (1) the appropriate representatives of Parties to CITES; and

    (2) the appropriate representatives of countries that are not parties to CITES and that are determined by the Secretary and the United States Trade Representative to be the leading importers, exporters, or consumers of bear viscera.

   SEC. 8. CERTAIN RIGHTS NOT AFFECTED.

    Except as provided in section 5, nothing in this Act affects--

    (1) the regulation by any State of the bear population of the State; or

    (2) any hunting of bears that is lawful under applicable State law (including regulations).

--

   HSUS Statement in Support of the Bear Protection Act

   The Humane Society of the United States, the nation's largest animal protection organization with over seven million members and constituents, strongly supports Senator McConnell's Bear Protection Act.

   The Bear Protection Act would eliminate the patchwork of state laws in the U.S. and improve protection of America's bears. Thirty-four states already ban commerce in bear viscera. The remaining states fall into three categories: six allow trade in gallbladders taken from bears legally killed in-state; eight allow trade in gallbladders from bears killed legally outside the state; and two states do not have pertinent laws. This current patchwork of state laws creates loopholes that are exploited by those engaged in the bear parts trade. The loopholes enable poachers to launder gallbladders through states that permit their sale. The Bear Protection Act would eliminate this patchwork of state laws, replacing it with one national law prohibiting import, export, and interstate commerce in bear viscera.

   Bear viscera, particularly the gallbladder and bile, have been traditionally used in Asian medicines to treat a variety of illnesses, from diabetes to heart disease. Today, bear viscera is also used in cosmetics and shampoos. Asian demand for bear viscera and products has increased with growing human populations and increased wealth. Bear gallbladders in South Korea are worth more than their weight in gold, potentially yielding a price of about $10,000 each.

   While demand for bear viscera and products has grown, Asian bear populations have dwindled. Seven of the eight extant species of bears are threatened by poaching to supply the increasing market demand for bear viscera and products. Most species of bears, and all Asian bear species, are afforded the highest level of protection under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). CITES has noted that the continued illegal trade in bear parts and derivatives of bear parts undermines the effectiveness of the Convention and that if CITES parties do not take action to eliminate such trade, poaching may cause declines of wild bears that could lead to the extirpation of certain populations or even species.

   Dwindling Asian bear populations have caused poachers to look to American bears to meet market demand for bear parts and products. While each year nearly 40,000 American black bears are legally hunted in thirty-six states and Canada, it is estimated that roughly the same number are illegally poached each year, according to a former chief law enforcement officer with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

   The U.S. Senate passed this legislation in the 106th Congress and we hope swift action will be taken again this year. We also hope that the House will follow the Senate's wise lead and act to protect bears across the globe before it's too late. The Humane Society of the United States applauds Senator McConnell and the quarter of the United States Senate that has signed onto the Bear Protection Act as original cosponsors. With Senator McConnell's leadership, there may come a day when bear poachers and bear parts profiteers no longer are able to ply their cruel trade unpunished.

--

   Bear Protection Act Is Urgently Needed

   The Society for Animal Protective Legislation strongly supports Senator Mitch McConnell in his effort to pass the Bear Protection Act once again. This bill would end the United States' involvement in the trade of bear viscera by prohibiting the import, export and interstate commerce in bear gallbladders and bile. Bears are targeted for their internal organs, which fetch enormous profits for the poachers who illegally kill them and the merchants who sell their organs for use in traditional medicine remedies.

   The insatiable, growing demand for bear viscera contributed mightily to the decimation of the Asiatic black bear and may do the same to the stable population of American black bears if a law is not passed to eliminate the United States' role in supplying this devastating bear parts trade.

   There is a price on the head of every bear in this country and Senator Mitch McConnell deserves high praise for introducing proactive legislation protecting bears from the looming threat of the gallbladder trade.

   The current patchwork of state laws addressing the trade in bear gallbladders and bile allows an illegal trade to flourish. It is impossible to distinguish visually the dissociated gallbladder of one state's black bear from another. This enables smugglers to acquire gallbladders illegally in one state, transport them to a state where commercialization of bear parts is legal, and sell the gallbladders under false pretenses. These gallbladders are also smuggled out of the country, providing a laundering opportunity for the sale of gallbladders from highly endangered bears.

   Enactment of Senator McConnell's Bear Protection Act will ensure that those who seek to profit by the reckless destruction of America's bears can be punished appropriately for their illegal and immoral activity.

[Page: S7093]  GPO's PDF

   Mr. McConnell's bill does not impact a state's ability to manage its resident bear population or a lawful hunter's ability to hunt bears in accordance with applicable state laws and regulations. The Bear Protection Act is not about bear hunting--it's about ending bear poaching. This is a laudable goal that all Americans should support.

   American citizens should not sit by helplessly while bears are slaughtered, their gallbladders ripped out and the carcass unceremoniously left to rot. It's time to take a stand against bear poachers and profiteers. Congratulations to Senator McConnell for taking up the charge.

--

   AMERICAN ZOO AND AQUARIUM ASSOCIATION,

   Silver Spring, MD, June 26, 2001.
Hon. MITCH MCCONNELL,
U.S. Senate,
Washington, DC.

   DEAR SENATOR MCCONNELL: I am writing on behalf of the 196 accredited members of the American Zoo and Aquarium Association (AZA) in support of your proposed Bear Protection Act of 2001.

   AZA institutions draw over 135 million visitors annually and have more than 5 million zoo and aquarium members who provide almost $100 million in support. Collectively, these institutions teach more than 12 million people each year in living classrooms, dedicate over $50 million annually to education programs, invest over $50 million annually to scientific research and support over 1,300 field conservation and research projects in 80 countries.

   In addition, AZA member institutions have established the Species Survival Plan (SSP) program--a long-term plan involving genetically-diverse breeding, habitat preservation, public education, field conservation and supportive research to ensure survival for many threatened and endangered species. Currently, AZA member institutions are involved in 96 different SSP programs throughout the world, including four species of bear --sloth, sun, spectacled and the giant panda.

   It is in this context that AZA expresses its support for the Bear Protection Act. There is little question that most populations of the world's eight bear species have experienced significant declines during this century, particularly in parts of Europe and Asia. Habitat loss has been the major reason for this decline, although overhunting and poaching have also been factors in some cases, especially in Asia. In recent years, the commercial trade of bear body parts, in particular gallbladders and bile, for use in traditional Asian medicines has been implicated as the driving force behind the illegal hunting of some bear populations. Analyses by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), TRAFFIC and other organizations have documented the existence of illicit commercial markets and smuggling rings for bear body parts.

   Recent information suggests that this is not only an overseas issue but a domestic one as well. The American black bear is listed on Appendix II of CITES due to the similarity of appearance to other listed bear species, and conservation and management of black bear populations remains largely in the hands of the states. Most states prohibit commercial trade in bear parts but there are some states that still allow commercial trade of products from bears taken within their borders. Several other states do not explicitly prohibit the commercial trade in parts from bears taken within the borders of other jurisdictions. This has raised concerns that inconsistent state laws may facilitate illegal trade and laundering of bear parts.

   The relatively high value of the wild bear parts, particularly viscera, on the international market warrants that continued action be taken to minimize the threat or potential threat of illegal trade. Your bill provides the necessary first step for closing the potential loopholes that are afforded to bear poachers and dealers by fragmented state laws. Equally important, the bill encourages dialogue between the U.S. and countries known to be leading importers, exporters, and consumers of bear viscera in an attempt to coordinate efforts to protect threatened and endangered bear populations worldwide.

   AZA applauds your efforts in this important wildlife conservation matter. In addition, AZA stands ready to work with you to ensure that the necessary funds are authorized and appropriate for the effective administration and enforcement of this critical work.

   Please feel free to contact AZA if you have any question or comments.

   Regards,

   Sydney J. Butler,
Executive Director.

   By Mr. BROWNBACK (for himself and Mr. ENZI):

   S. 1126. A bill to facilitate the deployment of broadband telecommunications services, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

   By Mr. BROWNBACK (for himself and Mr. ENZI):

   S. 1127. A bill to stimulate the deployment of advanced telecommunications services in rural areas, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

   Mr. BROWNBACK. Mr. President, next week our nation will celebrate Independence Day. Yet, as we celebrate the land of opportunity that is America, we must keep in mind those who, even in this great nation, do not have the same opportunities as everyone else. In rural communities across the nation, an entire segment of our population does not have the opportunity to access powerful broadband communications services representing the high-speed, high-capacity on-ramps to the information super highway. Why? Because for all intents and purposes broadband does not exist in most of rural America.

   Broadband is increasing the speeds and capacity with which consumers and businesses alike access the Internet, and opening up a whole new world of information, e-commerce, real-time high quality telemedicine, distance learning, and entertainment. The power of broadband will level the playing field between rural and urban communities in a global economy.

   Today I rise to introduce the Rural Broadband Deployment Act of 2001 and the Broadband Deployment and Competition Enhancement Act of 2001. Two bills designed to ensure that all Americans have access to the advantages of broadband connections. I would like to thank my colleague from Wyoming, Senator ENZI, for his cosponsorship and support. These two bills, together or individually, will ensure broadband deployment in our nation's rural areas, and will enable us to renew our long-standing commitment that rural communities have access to the same telecommunications resources as urban communities.

   My singular objective, in both bills, is high-speed Internet access for everybody in America by 2007.

   This is a bipartisan objective. The Democratic party has announced its intention to ensure universal access to broadband by the end of this decade. I commend my colleagues on the other side of the aisle for their recognition of the importance of broadband and I look forward to working with them to achieve our common goal.

   New approaches will be needed to achieve universal broadband availability. Some of my colleagues have introduced legislation consisting of tax incentives or loan subsidies. Programs such as these can help to deliver on the commitment to make broadband universally available, but these proposals alone will not achieve that goal. Deregulation has a key role to play in this effort.

   Deregulation has been the driver of broadband deployment to date: cable companies, largely deregulated by the 1996 Telecommunications Act, have invested almost 50 billion dollars in upgrades to their networks. These upgrades have in turn enabled them to deploy broadband, and cable companies now serve 70 percent of the broadband market. Satellite companies, also

   unregulated in the broadband market, are deploying one-way high-speed Internet access and are working to deploy two-way broadband services. Some companies are utilizing wireless cable licenses to deploy broadband, and they too are unregulated in the broadband market.

<<< >>>


THIS SEARCH     THIS DOCUMENT     THIS CR ISSUE     GO TO
Next Hit        Forward           Next Document     New CR Search
Prev Hit        Back              Prev Document     HomePage
Hit List        Best Sections     Daily Digest      Help
                Contents Display