Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next Message Next Message

Employment Retention and Advancement of Current and Former Welfare Recipients 

Forum: TANF Reauthorization
Date: 2001, Nov 30
From: Amy Robins <arobins@jff.org>

Jobs for the Future is a national non-profit research, policy, and consulting organization that seeks to improve education and economic opportunities to help those struggling in our economy. We have developed the TANF reauthorization policy recommendations below based on our work with a wide range of employer organizations, employers, and providers of workforce development services for those with few skills and little work experience. Our recommendations focus primarily on employment retention and advancement of current and former welfare recipients. With the slowing of the economy and a slight increase in welfare caseloads across the country, this next era of welfare reform must focus on helping those transitioning off of welfare gain stable, family supporting employment. For that reason, we respectfully submit the following recommendations for consideration: 1) The statement of purpose and goals of TANF should explicitly include increasing the extent of self-sufficiency of TANF recipients. In support of this goal, state performance measures should include sustained employment, earnings growth, and sub-state based family-supporting income standards (that incorporate income from employment and public sources such as EITC, childcare subsidies, health insurance subsidies, and food stamps). 2) TANF policies should encourage states to count participation in education and training programs that are designed to meet occupational skill requirements toward fulfillment of the work requirement. In particular, during economic downturns, work requirements should be designed so that “downtime” is training time for employees who are working part-time and for those who are jobless. 3) The needs of those who are working and those who are going to work, as well as the needs of employers, should drive education and training opportunities funded by TANF. Policies should be designed to target employment in jobs that lead to self-sufficiency where there is high demand, and education and training should be connected to these employment opportunities. 4) The TANF time limit clock should stop for individuals who receive cash assistance while they are employed more than half-time or are participating in education and training activities that improve employment prospects. 5) Policies should encourage states to expand eligibility for TANF-funded education and training opportunities as well as access to other non-cash assistance that supports employment, education, and training, to include all working poor. A priority should be placed on upgrade training for low-wage, entry-level workers who are not making progress toward achieving family-supporting income standards. 6) States should be encouraged to fully utilize TANF resources in combination with other available funding sources. Policy should mandate participation by TANF and workforce development agencies in state and local planning processes in order to promote collaboration, and should align outcome criteria across agencies, with consistent ways of measuring outcomes, and explicit provisions for collaborating agencies to share credit for successful outcomes. The objective of these policies should be creation of an employment and training system that is responsive to the needs of employers and meets the needs of all job seekers. Rather than a patchwork of programs that affect different workers in the same workplace differently, policies should promote a more flexible, coherent service delivery system. 7) Legislation should include a grants program to spur states to experiment with different approaches to retention and advancement, and the program should provide resources for capacity building. 8) TANF policies should target resources to strengthen workforce services valued by employers that have jobs that lead to self-sufficiency. These policies should make systems and programs more responsive to employers. The design of these policies should encourage use of resources to reduce employers’ costs and risks and leverage employer investments in retention and advancement activities. 9) Incentives should be provided for use of TANF resources for intermediary organizations that are able to meet the needs of employers as well as TANF recipients, and especially those that connect small employers to workforce development service providers that work with TANF recipients. 10) States should be given incentives to experiment with publicly funded job creation programs. 11) TANF should be reauthorized at current funding levels. Sufficient additional funding should be provided to make income supports such as childcare subsidies, health care subsidies, and food stamps available to all those who are eligible. Thank you for your consideration.

 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next Message Next Message

 Add Add
to: "Employment Retention and Advancement of Current and Former Welfare Recipients"

 Members Members
 Subscribe Subscribe
 Admin Mode Admin Mode
 Show Frames Show Frames
 Help Help