Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next Message Next Message

Reduce Family Poverty 

Forum: TANF Reauthorization
Date: 2001, Nov 29
From: christine brooks <chris_brooks43@hotmail.com>

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Should Reduce Family Poverty Close to half of families who have left welfare remain poor, even though most of those who have left welfare have worked. In welfare reform's next phase, reducing child and family poverty must be made an explicit purpose of the law. If Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF, or welfare) is to be improved as a means of reducing poverty, federal and state funding must at least be maintained and adjusted for inflation. States should receive additional funds to help reduce family poverty and to increase the availability of child care for working families. TANF can do more to support work if low wages plus TANF cash benefits do not count against the 5-year time limit, if families can earn back months of assistance through months of work, and if more education and training count towards fulfilling the work requirement. TANF must do more to protect very vulnerable families, such as those with disabilities or who have suffered domestic violence. States should be required to review cases to ensure that families are not wrongly dropped from TANF and that severe work barriers are caught before families lose TANF. In a time of growing unemployment, states must have more flexibility to exempt these families from time limits. Further, the law should do more to ensure that children and families get the help for which they are eligible. Families leaving welfare must continue to receive food stamps, Medicaid, child care, and other necessary supports to make the transition from welfare a success. Child care is a critical support to low-income families--those leaving welfare and those in the workforce. The reauthorization of the welfare reform legislation provides an important opportunity to improve and expand the availability and quality of child care. Funding for the Child Care and Development Block Grant must be increased so that every family who needs help can get it, and so states can improve the overall quality of child care while also increasing wages and education for child care teachers. As a social worker in the school district for the past 5 years, I have seen the results of the change from AFDC to TANF. Although some changes have been helpful to get families to work, the time limits placed on supportive benefits such as food stamps, child care and medical put families in a position to remain as "working poor" or to quit jobs altogether because they don't have the support they need to be at work. Most of the jobs they can get are minimum wage jobs, and they find it nearly impossible to work full-time, not get medical benefits and then have to take time off to take care of sick children they cannot received medical for. The cost of child care has risen phenomenally, and not at the same rate wages have. So often these kids are left home alone after school because families can't affort the care. It's clearly a vicious cycle that continues to undermine their efforts. There's no question in my mind that this cycle contributes to the increased drug use in our community. I see it day to day all to often to dismiss it. I know you wouldn't be involved in this area of legislation if you weren't interested in the welfare of families and children. Please listen to those of us who work side by side with them in our communities.

 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next Message Next Message

 Add Add
to: "Reduce Family Poverty"

 Members Members
 Subscribe Subscribe
 Admin Mode Admin Mode
 Show Frames Show Frames
 Help Help