Copyright 2001 eMediaMillWorks, Inc.
(f/k/a Federal
Document Clearing House, Inc.)
Federal Document Clearing House
Congressional Testimony
March 15, 2001, Thursday
SECTION: CAPITOL HILL HEARING TESTIMONY
LENGTH: 6507 words
COMMITTEE:
HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS
SUBCOMMITTEE:
HUMAN RESOURCES
HEADLINE: TESTIMONY WELFARE OVERHAUL
EFFECTS
TESTIMONY-BY: CYNTHIA M. FAGNONI , MANAGING
DIRECTOR, EDUCATION, WORKFORCE, AND INCOME SECURITY ISSUES
AFFILIATION: GAO
BODY:
Statement of Cynthia M. Fagnoni, Manager Director,
Education, Workforce, and Income Security Issues, Health,
Education and Human Services Division, U.S. General Accounting
Office Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Human Resources of the House
Committee on Ways and Means Hearing on Welfare Reform March 15, 2001 WELFARE
REFORM: PROGRESS IN MEETING WORK-FOCUSED
TANF GOALS Mr.
Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee: Thank you for inviting me here today
to discuss the progress of welfare reform and our related work. The 1996
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (P.L.
104-193) (PRWORA) significantly changed federal welfare policy for low-income
families with children, building upon and expanding state-level reforms. It
ended the federal entitlement to assistance for eligible needy families with
children under Aid to Families With Dependent Children (AFDC) and created the
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families block grant (
TANF),
designed to help needy families reduce their dependence on welfare and move
toward economic independence. Under
TANF, states have increased
flexibility to meet four broad goals: - Providing assistance to needy families
so that children may be cared for in their own homes or in the homes of
relatives; - Ending the dependence of needy parents on government benefits by
promoting job preparation, work, and marriage; - Preventing and reducing the
incidence of out-of-wedlock pregnancies; and - Encouraging the formation and
maintenance of two-parent families. In addition, PRWORA requires states to
impose federal work and other program requirements on most adults receiving aid
and to enforce a lifetime limit of 5 years, or less at state option, on the
receipt of federal assistance. As states have implemented
TANF,
this Subcommittee has asked us to examine a broad range of welfare reform
issues. My testimony today will focus on the progress of welfare reform related
to the goals of providing assistance and reducing dependency by promoting work.
More specifically, it discusses (1) states' progress in implementing
TANF, (2) the status of families who have left welfare, (3) the
characteristics of adults currently receiving
TANF and state
strategies for helping hard-to-employ recipients find jobs, and (4) emerging
issues as welfare reform evolves. The information on former welfare recipients
is from our 1999 review of state studies and more recent studies. Information on
current welfare recipients and state strategies for serving hard-to-employ
recipients is drawn from our latest review of national data, numerous research
studies, and visits to six states from a new report to this Subcommittee to be
released soon. In summary, our work shows that states are transforming the
nation's welfare system into a work-based, temporary assistance program for
needy families, with a focus on moving people into employment rather than
signing them up for cash assistance. States' implementation of
TANF, undertaken in a time of strong economic growth, has been
accompanied by a 50 percent decline in the number of families receiving cash
welfare--from 4.4 million in August 1996 to 2.2 million as of June 2000. Our
review of state-sponsored studies available in 1999 and several more recent
studies show that most of the adults in families remaining off the welfare rolls
were employed at some time after leaving welfare. Of adults who continue to
receive
TANF cash assistance, national data show that a higher
percentage is currently engaged in work than previously--17 percent in fiscal
year 1997 compared to 25 percent in fiscal year 1999. A majority of those on the
rolls, however, are not working or engaged in work activities, in part because
many have characteristics that make it difficult for them to get and keep jobs.
All six of the states we visited have modified their "work first"
programs--designed to move recipients quickly into jobs--to better serve
recipients who face difficulties in entering the workforce. States have found
that some of the recipients with such difficulties do, in fact, find jobs. While
states have made significant progress in meeting work- focused goals, as welfare
reform continues to evolve, attention should be paid to these issues: -
Emphasizing and enhancing work-based strategies, including engaging
hard-to-employ recipients in work and helping families stay off welfare and
increase their earnings; and - Fostering and facilitating improved management
and service delivery approaches by states. AS STATES IMPLEMENTED WELFARE REFORM
AMID STRONG ECONOMIC GROWTH, WELFARE CASELOADS DROPPED 50 PERCENT Consistent
with the thrust of the federal welfare reform law, states are moving away from a
welfare system focused on entitlement to assistance to one that emphasizes
finding employment as quickly as possible, called a "work first" approach. Our
work and other studies show that many states and localities have transformed
their welfare offices into job placement centers. In some locations, applicants
are expected to engage in job search activities as soon as they apply for
assistance and may be provided support services, such as child care and
transportation, to support their work efforts without adding them to the welfare
rolls. Our recently issued report on child care noted that spending on child
care programs for low- income families under
TANF and the Child
Care and Development Fund increased substantially in recent years, from $4.1
billion in fiscal year 1997 to $6.9 billion in fiscal year 1999 in constant
dollars. As many welfare offices have increased their emphasis on work
activities, welfare offices and workers are also focusing more on helping
clients address and solve problems that interfere with employment. In addition,
some states are using the flexibility allowed under
TANF to
continue providing services to families who left the welfare rolls as a result
of employment, including, in some cases, providing case management services to
help ensure that families can deal with problems that might put parents' jobs at
risk. Some states are also providing services to low-income working families not
receiving cash assistance. States' implementation of more work-based programs,
undertaken under conditions of strong economic growth, has been accompanied by a
dramatic decline in the number of families receiving cash welfare. As shown in
figure 1, the number of families receiving welfare remained steady during the
1980s and then rose rapidly during the early 1990s. The caseload decline began
in 1995 and accelerated after passage of PRWORA, with a 50 percent decline in
the number of families receiving cash welfare--from 4.4 million families in
August 1996 to 2.2 million families in June 2000. Caseload reductions occurred
in all states, ranging from 10 percent in the District of Columbia to 85 percent
in Wyoming. While economic growth and state welfare reforms have been cited as
key factors to explain nationwide caseload decline, there is no consensus about
the extent to which each factor has contributed to these declines. MOST ADULTS
IN FORMER WELFARE FAMILIES WERE EMPLOYED AT SOME TIME AFTER LEAVING WELFARE,
OFTEN AT LOW-WAGE JOBS Information on former welfare recipients shows that most
adults who left welfare had at least some attachment to the workforce. Our 1999
review on the status of former welfare recipients identified studies from seven
states that provided representative data on families leaving welfare. Employment
rates among adults in the families who left welfare in these seven states ranged
from 61 to 87 percent. However, the employment rates were measured in different
ways. Studies measuring employment at the time of follow-up reported employment
rates from 61 to 71 percent. Studies measuring whether an adult in a family had
ever been employed since leaving welfare reported employment rates from 63 to 87
percent. A more recent review of state and local-level studies supported by
funds from HHS' Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation
(ASPE) shows similar patterns. In addition, a recent report by the Urban
Institute, using data from its 1999 National Survey of America's Families
(NSAF)--a nationally representative sample-- finds that 64 percent of former
recipients who did not return to
TANF reported that they were
working at the time of follow-up, while another 11 percent reported working at
some point since leaving welfare. Not all families who leave welfare remain off
the rolls. In the seven studies we reviewed, the percentages of the families who
left welfare and then returned to the rolls ranged from 19 percent after 3
months in Maryland to 30 percent after 15 months in Wisconsin. In ASPE's recent
review of state and local-level studies, the proportion of families who returned
to welfare within 12 months after exit ranged from 12 percent in San Mateo
County, California, to 29 percent in Cuyahoga County, Ohio. The study using 1999
NSAF data reported that 22 percent of those who had left the rolls were again
receiving benefits at time of the survey follow-up. Of those who left welfare,
former recipients in the seven states we reviewed had average quarterly earnings
that generally ranged from $2,378 to $3,786 or from $9,512 to $15,144 annually.
This estimated annual earned income is greater than the maximum annual amount of
cash assistance and food stamps that a three-person family with no other income
could have received in these states. However, if these earnings were the only
source of income for families after they leave welfare, many of them would
remain below the federal poverty level. In addition to information on
individuals' earned incomes, former recipients' total household income and use
of other government supports are key to understanding the circumstances of these
families. For example, the recently expanded earned income credit (EIC) can
increase the incomes of qualified low-income families by as much as $2,271 for
families with one child and $3,756 for families with two or more children. The
ASPE review of state and local-level studies reported that there were limited
data on total household income. Reports from the few states that attempted to
gather this information found that 45 to 50 percent of household income comes
from the adult leaving
TANF, 20 to 40 percent from others in
the household, and between 3 and 8 percent from other sources, such as child
support and Supplemental Security Income. More is known about former recipients'
use of other government supports. Some of the state studies we reviewed reported
that between 44 and 83 percent of the families who left welfare received
Medicaid benefits, and between 31 and 60 percent received food stamps. More
recent research at the state level and nationally also shows differences in the
rate of Medicaid and food stamps receipt among former welfare recipients. STATES
ARE TAKING STEPS TO HELP HARD-TO-EMPLOY RECIPIENTS FIND JOBS While many adults
have left the welfare rolls for work, those remaining on the rolls have
increased their work efforts. Nationwide, the percentage of
TANF recipients combining welfare and work has risen from 17
percent in fiscal year 1997 to 25 percent in fiscal year 1999. Most current
recipients, however, are not engaged in work or work activities as defined by
PRWORA. At least in part, this may be because many current recipients have
characteristics that make it difficult for them to work, according to data from
national surveys and several studies, as well as from officials in the six
states that we visited. The states we visited had taken steps to help
hard-to-employ recipients move into jobs, such as improving and expanding case
management or providing programs and services targeted specifically to prepare
them for work. While recipients with one or more work-impeding characteristics
may find the transition to work difficult, the states have found that some do
find jobs. A Majority of
TANF Recipients Are Not Engaged in
Work Activities, in Part Because Many Have Characteristics That Make It
Difficult for Them to Get and Keep Jobs The proportion of
TANF
recipients nationwide who were engaged in unsubsidized employment increased
during the past few years. According to our analysis of HHS data, the percentage
of recipients who were engaged in unsubsidized employment increased from 17
percent in fiscal year 1997 to 25 percent (or 400,000 recipients) in fiscal year
1999.In the states we reviewed that provided us with data on their caseload
characteristics, the percentage of the caseload that was employed ranged from 6
percent to just under 40 percent. This wide range of rates may be explained in
part by the varying state policies on the amount of earnings a person may retain
while still remaining eligible for welfare. Although more
TANF
recipients are combining welfare and work, in fiscal year 1999 a majority did
not participate in work activities--a monthly average of nearly 60 percent of
all
TANF recipients nationwide. Although this may have been
caused by weak implementation of state work programs, the characteristics of
TANF recipients may affect their abilities to engage in work
and work activities. Studies have shown that having certain characteristics,
such as poor health or disability, no high school diploma, limited work
experience, exposure to domestic violence, substance abuse, and limited English
proficiency, makes engaging in work activities more difficult. Based on data
from its 1997 National Survey of America's Families (NSAF), the Urban Institute
found that the greater the number of these characteristics a
TANF recipient has, the less likely that recipient is to be
engaged in work or work activities. The survey showed that 88 percent of
recipients who had none of these characteristics were working or engaging in
work-related activities, compared to 59 percent with one of these
characteristics and 27 percent with three or more (see figure 2). Officials in
all six of the states we visited agreed that recipients with one or more
work-impeding characteristics find it hardest to successfully enter the
workforce, and are often referred to as hard-to-employ recipients. However,
states have found that while having these characteristics makes employment
difficult, some recipients do, in fact, find jobs. Our analysis of existing
studies showed that a considerable percentage of
TANF
recipients have characteristics that make it difficult for them to work. Table 1
identifies the range of estimates a number of studies provide on the prevalence
of some of these characteristics in the welfare population. For example,
estimates of the proportion of the welfare caseload with health problems or
disability range from 20 to 40 percent, and the proportion of the caseload with
no high school diploma from 30 to 45 percent. Information from the states we
visited is consistent with the studies' data. Officials in these states
indicated that many recipients have poor mental or physical health, have
substance abuse problems, or were victims of domestic violence. Some officials
noted that the actual extent of these characteristics can be hard to determine
because most states and localities rely on recipients to disclose this
information about themselves to their case managers, which they are often
reluctant to do. All Six of the States We Visited Have Modified Their "Work
First" Programs to Better Serve Hard-to-Employ Recipients The six states we
visited implemented a
TANF program that can be characterized as
"work first" and, as a result, their
TANF programs share a few
common elements. All of the programs seek to move people from welfare into
unsubsidized jobs as quickly as possible. Officials expressed the belief that
the best way to succeed in the labor market is to join it, and the best setting
in which to develop successful work habits and skills is on the job. However, to
varying degrees, these six states have modified or enhanced their approach to
better serve recipients for whom the "work first" approach is not successful
because they have characteristics that may impede employment. The states we
visited differ markedly in their approach to identifying recipients who have
these characteristics so that they can either be exempted from work requirements
or provided with targeted programs and services that would help them obtain
employment. Some states and localities require
TANF recipients
to look for a job and offer enhanced services only to those who are
unsuccessful, while others begin by screening and assessing new applicants to
identify those with characteristics that might impede their ability to get a
job. The strategies states use to assist those recipients identified as
hard-to-employ also vary. Some of the states we visited have focused their
efforts on improving and expanding case management, while others have targeted
programs and services specifically to prepare hard-to-employ recipients for
work. All six of the states we visited also refer recipients to programs run by
non-
TANF agencies and organizations that help recipients deal
with specific problems such as substance abuse and mental illness that may
affect their ability to get and keep a job. During our site visits, state and
local officials reported program success at the local level. For example, in
Grand Rapids, Michigan, the local
TANF agency has stationed two
case managers at a large company that employs
TANF recipients
to help hard-to- employ recipients retain their jobs. These on-site case
managers serve as a resource both for employees and for the employer, helping
employees cope with crises that might otherwise cause them to lose their jobs,
and intervening on behalf of the employer at the first sign of trouble. The
company's retention rate for current and former
TANF recipients
was 81 percent, as compared to only 33 percent for their
non-
TANF employees. Company officials directly attributed the
higher retention rates to on- site case management and cooperation from the
local
TANF agency. EMERGING ISSUES AS WELFARE REFORM EVOLVES As
states have taken steps to implement a work-based, temporary assistance program
for needy families, key issues have emerged, including continuing support for
work--for those on the welfare rolls and those already employed--and building
state and local management and service delivery capacity. Emphasizing and
Enhancing Work-Based Strategies As many
TANF recipients have
moved into employment, emerging issues are related to helping those remaining on
the rolls move into the workforce, enforcing work requirements in future years,
and helping former welfare recipients maintain their employment. The states we
visited in 2000 said that while some
TANF recipients with
work-impeding characteristics are able to successfully enter the workforce, many
need considerable time and support in order to become work-ready, including
services and work-preparation activities that address their specific needs. To
be successful in moving hard-to-employ
TANF recipients into the
workforce within their 5-year time limit for federal benefits, states will need
to provide work-preparation activities tailored to the needs of their
hard-to-employ recipients. To help states with this challenge, we have
recommended that HHS do more to promote research and provide guidance that would
encourage and enable states to estimate the number and characteristics of hard-
to-employ recipients. In addition, we have recommended that HHS expand the scope
of its guidance to states to help them use the flexibility they have under
PWRORA to provide appropriate work- preparation activities for hard-to-employ
recipients within the current
TANF rules. During our site
visits we discovered that some states and localities did not understand the full
range of flexibility they have under the law. In addition to working with
hard-to-employ recipients, states must enforce federal work requirements for
most
TANF recipients. The robust economy has generally helped
states meet federal work participation rates. In fiscal year 1999, the highest
percentage of
TANF adult recipients meeting federal work
participation rates- -66 percent--was in unsubsidized employment. Moreover,
states were also aided in meeting federal participation rates by receiving
credits for the recent caseload reductions as allowed under PRWORA. In the event
of an economic downturn when jobs may be less readily available, more states may
turn to alternative activities for meeting their work requirements. These
activities could include subsidized employment, work experience, community
service, and on-the-job training, which we call work-site activities. However,
states have more limited experience with work-site activities; nationwide only
about 14 percent of
TANF recipients meeting federal work
participation rates were in such activities in fiscal year 1999. As a result,
implementing large- scale work programs may prove challenging. To provide
valuable information for administrators and policymakers on what could in the
future become an increasingly important part of
TANF programs
nationwide, we recommended that HHS take steps to collect more information on
work-site activities, including supporting evaluations of them, and disseminate
such information to the states. HHS has taken steps to support some evaluations
in this area. While promoting work among those receiving welfare is essential,
some states have turned their attention to supporting the work efforts of those
who have left the rolls. Many former welfare recipients are employed in low-wage
jobs and at risk of returning to welfare.
TANF provides states
the flexibility to devise and implement strategies that help such families
maintain and advance in their jobs. Some states and localities have undertaken
efforts to help low-wage workers upgrade their job skills to improve their job
prospects. For example, when we visited states in 1998, we found that Michigan
had set aside $12 million for post employment training for
TANF
clients who were already meeting their work requirements. Similarly, Wisconsin
had a $1 million Employment Skills Advancement Program under which poor working
parents--including
TANF clients--received grants for attending
training programs through the workforce development system. HHS is evaluating
some projects designed to help former welfare recipients retain their jobs and
advance in the workplace. Fostering and Facilitating Improved Management and
Service Delivery Approaches As welfare agencies focus on moving needy families
toward economic independence by providing a wide array of services, such as
child care, food stamps, and employment and training services, they are drawing
on numerous federal and state programs--often administered by separate agencies.
These are sweeping changes that have profound implications for the information
needs of states and the automated systems designed to meet those needs. Although
automated systems in the 15 states we examined in 1999 supported welfare reform
in many ways, a number of these systems have major limitations in one or more of
three key areas--case management, service planning, and program oversight. We
found, for example, that some state and local agencies had difficulties in
accessing data on the characteristics of
TANF recipients that
the agencies could use to identify and meet the service needs of their
caseloads. We also identified a gap in the ability of automated systems to
support enforcement of the 5-year
TANF time limit across
states. While states are making efforts to improve their systems, they face
obstacles--including some at the federal level, such as the complexity of
obtaining federal funding for systems projects that involve multiple agencies.
To facilitate states' efforts, we recommended that HHS establish an interagency
group to help overcome this and other difficulties. HHS, Labor, and Agriculture
have begun meeting regularly to address these issues. Sustained high-level
attention will be needed to move forward in this important area. Welfare
agencies' increased focus on helping needy adults with children find and
maintain employment brings them directly into the province of the workforce
development system. When we reviewed the role of the workforce development
system in providing services to welfare recipients in the states in 1998, we
observed that workforce development and welfare systems were still largely
independent. When the Congress created the Welfare- to-Work grant program in
1997, under which it authorized $3 billion in grants to be administered through
the Department of Labor to help hard-to-employ individuals, it provided an
opportunity for the two systems, in participating states, to collaborate. In
addition, the passage of the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) of 1998, designed to
integrate and streamline federal employment and training services, requires most
employment and training services to be provided through a single system, called
the One-Stop Center System. These recent changes in the workforce development
system, along with welfare reform, give states and localities an opportunity to
reassess how employment-related services are coordinated and delivered. While
providing
TANF services through one-stop centers is a state and
local option, we noted in our 2000 report that at the local level, 24 states
reported providing at least some
TANF services on-site at a
majority of their one-stop centers. Seven states provided
TANF
employment and eligibility services, Medicaid, and food stamp services at a
majority of their one-stop centers. While it is too early to know what service
delivery approaches may prove most effective and efficient, as welfare reform
and WIA implementation evolve, research will be warranted to determine best
practices. Mr. Chairman, this concludes my prepared statement. I will be happy
to respond to any questions you or other Members of the Subcommittee may have.
LOAD-DATE: March 17, 2001, Saturday