THIS SEARCH     THIS DOCUMENT     THIS CR ISSUE     GO TO
Next Hit        Forward           Next Document     New CR Search
Prev Hit        Back              Prev Document     HomePage
Hit List        Best Sections     Daily Digest      Help
                Contents Display

[Page: H1624]  GPO's PDF
---

   (Mr. NADLER asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)

   Mr. NADLER. Mr. Speaker, today I would like to ask my colleagues just one question. As we consider reauthorizing our Nation's welfare program, what do we want to accomplish, a temporary fix, or a comprehensive solution to poverty?

   If we truly want a comprehensive solution, we would allow TANF recipients to count education as a work activity so that they can move into living-wage jobs and not end up back on TANF 6 months after they leave. If we want a comprehensive solution, we would invest in quality child care so parents could go to work to ensure their children will be safe in a nurturing environment that is preparing them for success in school and beyond. If we want a comprehensive solution, we would recognize the typical immigrant worker pays $80,000 more in taxes than they receive in government benefits over a lifetime, and we would restore the safety net for them.

   We would do all of this if we wanted a comprehensive solution.

   But the Republican proposal does not embody this common sense. What is in their bills is a program that sets low-income people up for failure. Dead-end workfare jobs with no opportunity to pursue further education and escape is a vicious cycle of poverty.

   I challenge my colleagues to make good their election year pledges to help America's working families and make these improvements in TANF this year.