Copyright 2002 The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
The Atlanta Journal and Constitution
March 17, 2002 Sunday, Home EditionSECTION: Editorial; Pg. 10D
LENGTH: 783 words
HEADLINE:
Diploma beats 'I do' in relieving poverty
SOURCE: AJC
BODY:In
his new welfare-reform program, President Bush stresses the importance of
putting a Mrs. in front of a woman's name. He should put even more emphasis on
putting a B.A. behind it.
Nothing is more effective
than education in lifting women out of poverty. With half of new marriages
ending in divorce --- the rate is even higher among people on welfare --- a
college degree provides more long-term economic security to low-income women
than a wedding ring.
Nonetheless, Bush wants to spend
up to $300 million steering low-income couples toward marriage. His goal is
probably valid: As the president points out, research shows that children fare
better in two-parent households. However, there's absolutely no evidence that
government persuasion will succeed in pushing people toward the altar or keeping
them together once married.
Furthermore, marriage is
hardly a direct route to a house in the suburbs, a two-car garage and
middle-class bliss. Nor is it a panacea to poverty. After all, 38 percent of
poor children in this country today already live in two-parent homes.
"It's like telling Enron to merge with an insolvent
company as a way out of bankruptcy," says Peter Goldberg, president of the
Alliance for Children and Families.
Instead of playing
matchmaker, government is better suited to helping welfare recipients find jobs,
get training and to subsidizing housing, transportation and child care expenses
not covered by their meager paychecks. Unfortunately, the Bush plan doesn't
really address those core problems. In trying to improve the landmark
welfare-reform program of 1996, the administration has settled on one basic
strategy: Get tougher.
And while that may be
appropriate in some cases, it is never the sole answer.
The current welfare program --- Temporary Assistance for Needy Families
--- was created to end dependence on a previous welfare system that critics said
subverted work and subsidized illegitimacy. To some degree it has worked.
Aided by a robust job market, TANF halved the nation's
welfare rolls in five years. Unfortunately, though, many former recipients have
landed in dead-end jobs, barely eking out a living for themselves and their
kids. Nationwide, 41 percent of those who left welfare still live at poverty
levels. Here in Georgia, the percentage of children living in poverty dropped
only 1 point between 1990 and 2000, from 20 percent to 19 percent, according to
the Annie E. Casey Foundation.
Those numbers aren't
surprising. Mothers who leave welfare typically take jobs as cashiers, maids or
in other low-paid, low-skill fields. The White House contends that these jobs
are just steppingstones, but the research shows they don't lead anywhere.
"There really is no growth and no career ladder in most of
these jobs," says Barbara Gault, director of research for the Washington-based
Institute for Women's Policy Research. "These women don't keep switching to
better jobs. They stay in bad jobs because they don't have the skills to get out
of them."
As part of its get-tough approach, the Bush
plan would also require that at least 70 percent of a state's welfare recipients
report to jobs of some sort by 2007, compared with 30 percent now. He also wants
those recipients to work at least 40 hours a week in exchange for benefits,
compared with 30 hours now.
Creating those additional
jobs will be expensive for state programs, in part because many of those on
welfare today have very young children, lack a high school degree and often
suffer from disabilities or substance-abuse problems. Getting to those folks
will require intensive education, training and treatment, but instead of
providing the resources to do so, the Bush plan reduces funding for
comprehensive educational and training opportunities. Even under the current
plan, states spend only 1 percent of
TANF dollars on job-skills
training.Child care is another important
problem. Single mothers often can't afford to work; their paycheck won't cover
the cost of child care, especially for children with disabilities. The average
day care subsidy to poor families is $65 a week, which is about half the market
rate in Atlanta. And the Bush budget allows no increase in funding for child
care assistance.
There's a lingering, sometimes willful
misperception that welfare is a hammock, not a safety net, as the cruel cliche
puts it. However, the average monthly welfare payment is only $350 a month,
which is hardly enough to let recipients recline on a chaise lounge and eat
bonbons all day.
True welfare reform creates hope among
recipients that they can someday do better. Unfortunately, the Bush reform plan
fails that test.
LOAD-DATE: March 17, 2002