President
to President Vol. 3, No. 22 • June 17-21,
2002
We celebrated a
major victory on Thursday, as the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 7-2 decision
clarifying that students and their parents cannot sue educational
institutions under a federal law that protects the privacy of student
educational records. In Gonzaga
University vs. John Doe, a graduate asserted he could not find a
teaching job because Gonzaga officials told representatives of Washington
state's teacher-certification office that he had been accused of sexually
assaulting another student. No charges were brought against Doe, and the
female student said she had not been sexually assaulted. The former
student maintained that, in revealing the allegation, Gonzaga violated the
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), more commonly known as
the Buckley Amendment. The American Council on
Education and other organizations filed an amicus brief with the Supreme
Court on behalf of Gonzaga. The court's
decision does not eliminate the "Buckley" requirements, nor does it mean
that colleges can share personal information on students. In addition, the
enforcement powers of the Department of Education remain unchanged. But it
does mean that individuals cannot sue educational institutions for
damages under this law. This is a major victory
for higher education, as it will shield colleges from a new stream of
liability claims and litigation. A copy of the Supreme Court decision can
be found at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/20jun20021230/www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/01pdf/01-679.pdf.
The Senate
Finance Committee approved legislation on Tuesday that includes more than
$5.5-billion in tax benefits over the next six years to encourage
charitable giving to organizations including colleges, universities, and
other non-profit groups. The Senate bill enjoys widespread support in
the higher education community. Among the key
provisions is the so-called "IRA Rollover," which will allow people age 70
1/2 and older to donate money from their Individual Retirement Accounts to
charity without incurring negative tax consequences. This provision would
take effect in the 2003 tax year. In addition,
the bill will allow taxpayers who do not itemize on their tax returns to
deduct charitable donations from their taxable income. That provision,
however, would apply only to the 2002 and 2003 tax years, because some
senators expressed concern about the cost of the deduction and wondered
whether it would really do much to encourage giving. The legislation
requires the treasury secretary to complete a study by the end of 2003 on
the effect of this provision. The legislation
now moves to the Senate floor, where consideration could be delayed
because of the backlog of bills waiting for attention. If passed by the
Senate, the bill would move to conference with the House, before being
sent to the president's desk for signature. We
are extremely pleased the Finance Committee has acted on this bill and
will encourage the Senate to consider it as soon as possible. We will keep
you posted as the process moves forward.
Under the Clinton
Administration's 1998 welfare reform, the ability of welfare recipients to
pursue education is sharply limited. In the recent effort to
reauthorize this law, educational options could be either expanded or
limited further. The House of Representatives
has already passed the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Act,
H.R. 4737, which closely parallels the Bush administration's proposal for
welfare reform. This bill would go beyond current law to impose even
stricter work requirements on welfare recipients, making it more difficult
to participate in postsecondary and vocational
education. Multiple welfare reform bills are
currently circulating in the Senate, with the Senate Finance Committee
expected to mark up a reauthorization measure as early as next
week. The higher education community seeks to
expand the education component of the program. I have sent several letters
to Members of Congress, and have made the following recommendations on
behalf of the higher education community:
- Allow at least 24 months of education and/or training to be counted
as an approved work activity;
- Include all higher education programs, not just vocational training
as at present, in the list of education activities that can count
towards a recipient's work requirement;
- Eliminate the cap on the percentage of a state's welfare recipients
who are able to participate in educational activities; and
- Do not count time spent on education and training against lifetime
or consecutive benefit time limits.
By
now you should have received a letter from the major presidential
associations, urging you to contact your respective senators and voice
support for provisions that expand educational opportunity for TANF
recipients. We believe there is an opportunity to shape the Senate bill to
expand educational opportunities but college and university leaders in
local communities need to be heard on the importance of this
issue. An electronic version of my most recent
letter is available on the ACE web site at http://www.acenet.edu/washington/letters/2002/06june/presidents.tanf.cfm.
Last week I
mentioned to you that I had sent a letter to INS on behalf of 30
associations regarding the draft SEVIS regulations. Several other
associations also sent letters and, as sometimes happens, we ended up in
somewhat different places. One association — AASCU — endorsed the proposed
January 30, 2003 effective date, a date that all other associations
believe is neither feasible nor desirable. Another association — NAFSA:
The Association of International Educators took what I believe was an
unfortunately strident tone. You may have seen that The Chronicle of
Higher Education noted these differences and wrote a story about them
for its web site — we understand a similar story will appear in next
week's print edition. I strongly believe that
implementing SEVIS as quickly as possible is the most important thing that
the federal government can do to improve its ability to track
international students. However, colleges should not be expected to
implement the system before INS has finished developing it or before we
have had the chance to acquire software (which is not yet available),
install it, and receive training on it. We are spending a great deal of
time working on this issue with the INS and will continue to monitor it
carefully. I regret that your Washington representatives could not
maintain a united front.
Last week I
promised you background material to help your campus prepare for the
provisions of the new "Public Health Security and Bioterrorism
Preparedness Act of 2002," recently signed by President Bush. I am
pleased to tell you that material is now available on the ACE web site at
http://www.acenet.edu/washington/letters/2002/06june/biohazard.memo.cfm.
Please have appropriate campus officials review this information and let
them know about concerns you may have.
Click here
to view past issues of ACE's "President to President" Weekly
Update.
ACE Division of Government & Public Affairs One Dupont
Circle NW, Washington, DC 20036 phone: (202) 939-9355 · fax: (202) 833-4762 e-mail: gpa@ace.nche.edu
© American Council on Education, 1996-2003. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. One
Dupont Circle NW, Washington, DC 20036 phone: (202) 939-9300 · fax:
(202) 833-4760
Please send your questions, comments, and
suggestions to: web@ace.nche.edu
Please review ACE's Online
Privacy Policy
Last
Modified: June 21, 2002
|