Purple spacer
About ACE
 
Eye on Washington
Position Letters
Federal Policy Analysis
Legal Update
Tax Issues
Press Release & Statement
Hena newsletter
Events Calendar
Division Staff
 
spacer image


spacer imageAmerican Council on Education
ACEnet logo
Go to ACE Homepage
ACE News
Eye on Washington
ACE Bookstore
Contact Us
Search the ACE Website

President to President
Vol. 3, No. 22 • June 17-21, 2002 

blue bullet We celebrated a major victory on Thursday, as the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 7-2 decision clarifying that students and their parents cannot sue educational institutions under a federal law that protects the privacy of student educational records.
    In Gonzaga University vs. John Doe, a graduate asserted he could not find a teaching job because Gonzaga officials told representatives of Washington state's teacher-certification office that he had been accused of sexually assaulting another student. No charges were brought against Doe, and the female student said she had not been sexually assaulted. The former student maintained that, in revealing the allegation, Gonzaga violated the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), more commonly known as the Buckley Amendment.
    The American Council on Education and other organizations filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court on behalf of Gonzaga.
    The court's decision does not eliminate the "Buckley" requirements, nor does it mean that colleges can share personal information on students. In addition, the enforcement powers of the Department of Education remain unchanged. But it does mean that individuals cannot sue educational institutions for damages under this law.
    This is a major victory for higher education, as it will shield colleges from a new stream of liability claims and litigation. A copy of the Supreme Court decision can be found at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/20jun20021230/www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/01pdf/01-679.pdf.

blue bullet The Senate Finance Committee approved legislation on Tuesday that includes more than $5.5-billion in tax benefits over the next six years to encourage charitable giving to organizations including colleges, universities, and other non-profit groups. The Senate bill enjoys widespread support in the higher education community.
    Among the key provisions is the so-called "IRA Rollover," which will allow people age 70 1/2 and older to donate money from their Individual Retirement Accounts to charity without incurring negative tax consequences. This provision would take effect in the 2003 tax year.
    In addition, the bill will allow taxpayers who do not itemize on their tax returns to deduct charitable donations from their taxable income. That provision, however, would apply only to the 2002 and 2003 tax years, because some senators expressed concern about the cost of the deduction and wondered whether it would really do much to encourage giving. The legislation requires the treasury secretary to complete a study by the end of 2003 on the effect of this provision.
    The legislation now moves to the Senate floor, where consideration could be delayed because of the backlog of bills waiting for attention. If passed by the Senate, the bill would move to conference with the House, before being sent to the president's desk for signature.
    We are extremely pleased the Finance Committee has acted on this bill and will encourage the Senate to consider it as soon as possible. We will keep you posted as the process moves forward.

blue bullet Under the Clinton Administration's 1998 welfare reform, the ability of welfare recipients to pursue education is sharply limited. In the recent effort to reauthorize this law, educational options could be either expanded or limited further.
    The House of Representatives has already passed the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Act, H.R. 4737, which closely parallels the Bush administration's proposal for welfare reform. This bill would go beyond current law to impose even stricter work requirements on welfare recipients, making it more difficult to participate in postsecondary and vocational education.
    Multiple welfare reform bills are currently circulating in the Senate, with the Senate Finance Committee expected to mark up a reauthorization measure as early as next week.
    The higher education community seeks to expand the education component of the program. I have sent several letters to Members of Congress, and have made the following recommendations on behalf of the higher education community:

  • Allow at least 24 months of education and/or training to be counted as an approved work activity;
  • Include all higher education programs, not just vocational training as at present, in the list of education activities that can count towards a recipient's work requirement;
  • Eliminate the cap on the percentage of a state's welfare recipients who are able to participate in educational activities; and
  • Do not count time spent on education and training against lifetime or consecutive benefit time limits.
    By now you should have received a letter from the major presidential associations, urging you to contact your respective senators and voice support for provisions that expand educational opportunity for TANF recipients. We believe there is an opportunity to shape the Senate bill to expand educational opportunities but college and university leaders in local communities need to be heard on the importance of this issue.
    An electronic version of my most recent letter is available on the ACE web site at http://www.acenet.edu/washington/letters/2002/06june/presidents.tanf.cfm.

blue bullet Last week I mentioned to you that I had sent a letter to INS on behalf of 30 associations regarding the draft SEVIS regulations. Several other associations also sent letters and, as sometimes happens, we ended up in somewhat different places. One association — AASCU — endorsed the proposed January 30, 2003 effective date, a date that all other associations believe is neither feasible nor desirable. Another association — NAFSA: The Association of International Educators took what I believe was an unfortunately strident tone. You may have seen that The Chronicle of Higher Education noted these differences and wrote a story about them for its web site — we understand a similar story will appear in next week's print edition.
    I strongly believe that implementing SEVIS as quickly as possible is the most important thing that the federal government can do to improve its ability to track international students. However, colleges should not be expected to implement the system before INS has finished developing it or before we have had the chance to acquire software (which is not yet available), install it, and receive training on it. We are spending a great deal of time working on this issue with the INS and will continue to monitor it carefully. I regret that your Washington representatives could not maintain a united front.

blue bullet Last week I promised you background material to help your campus prepare for the provisions of the new "Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness Act of 2002," recently signed by President Bush. I am pleased to tell you that material is now available on the ACE web site at http://www.acenet.edu/washington/letters/2002/06june/biohazard.memo.cfm. Please have appropriate campus officials review this information and let them know about concerns you may have.




Click here to view past issues of ACE's
"President to President" Weekly Update.

ACE Division of Government & Public Affairs
One Dupont Circle NW, Washington, DC 20036
phone: (202) 939-9355 · fax: (202) 833-4762
e-mail: gpa@ace.nche.edu



© American Council on Education, 1996-2003.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
.
One Dupont Circle NW, Washington, DC 20036
phone: (202) 939-9300 · fax: (202) 833-4760

Please send your questions, comments, and suggestions to:
web@ace.nche.edu

Please review ACE's Online Privacy Policy

Last Modified: June 21, 2002