Work
Requirements. The Bush plan would require that more families
work more hours. Under the proposal families would be required to
be engaged in a work activity for 40 hours per week - a one-third
increase from the current 30 hour requirement (20 hours for single
parents with young children). In addition, the Bush Administration
would require that states put 70 percent of their caseload in
work, or suffer financial consequences. Currently, states have
about one-third of their caseload in work.
State
Flexibility. Although the Administration claims that state
flexibility lies at the heart of welfare reform, the Bush plan
limits state flexibility and tells states how to run their welfare
programs. The plan would mandate that states require parents to
spend at least 24 hours a week in a very limited set of work
activities (unsubsidized employment, work experience, community
service or on-the-job training), while allowing them to use other
activities (such as job search, GED classes, or vocational
education) for the remaining 16 hours of required work. Families
in substance abuse treatment or job training services may have
these activities count towards the 24 hour requirement for one
three-month period.
Child Care
Funding. The Bush budget proposal would provide no new child
care funds for the next five years, despite increased work
requirements. The Administration plan would allow 114,000 fewer
children to receive child care assistance over the next five
years. Child care is key to helping families stay employed, but
demand for child care assistance far outstrips supply. Only one in
seven children who are federally eligible for child care
assistance receives it. Florida and Texas each have 37,000
families waiting for child care assistance; in Massachusetts the
list is 18,000.
TANF
Funding. The Administration's plan adds no additional dollars
to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) block grant.
Without an adjustment for inflation over the next five years, the
block grant will lose 29 percent of its current value. In FY 2000,
States spent about $2 billion more than their annual block grant,
by dipping into prior years' funds. States will quickly spend any
remaining prior year funds as they try to meet increased work
requirements and attempt to fill state budget deficits. In
addition, many states have seen their caseloads increase slightly
in recent months.
Employment
and Training. The Administration says that welfare reform
should move families into permanent employment, yet the plan will
push states to abandon strategies that help families find higher
paying jobs. Under the proposal, job search, vocational education
or job skills training directly related to employment do not count
towards the first 24 hours of required work in a family's 40-hour
work week. The current law allows vocational education (for 12
months maximum), job skills training, and education related to
employment to count as a work activity.
Work
Supports. The Administration's proposal makes no efforts to
ensure that families moving from welfare to work get the benefits
- such as food stamps, health care, child care and transportation
help - for which they are eligible. Research reveals that many
families trading welfare for work do not receive work supports
that can help them stay on the job. Those families that have made
a successful transition from welfare to work and do receive work
supports may be in danger of losing them. The burden of meeting
work participation requirements among current recipients may
pressure states to shift money away from work supports for the
working poor.
Legal
Immigrants. The 1996 welfare law banned most legal immigrants
from receiving federal welfare assistance until they have been
working in the United States for at least five years. About three
million legal immigrants (about one-third of all legal permanent
residents in the country) have been in the country for five years
or less. The Administration's plan continues this ban.