 This Week in Washington
January 4, 2002
Provided by the Water Environment
Federation, Alexandria, VA
Utility Leaders Present WIN Views to Senate EPW
Staff Representatives from 10 water and
wastewater utilities met with staff from the Senate
Environment and Public Works Committee on January 3. The
utility leaders provided firsthand information on water
and wastewater capital needs in their communities, and
answered questions relating to potential water
infrastructure legislation. Topics covered in the
wide-ranging discussion included local rate structures,
the need for grants in addition to the existing safe
drinking water and clean water revolving loan funds, SRF
streamlining, and methods for targeting assistance to
disadvantaged communities. Senate staff indicated they
would be drafting legislation this month and hope to
hold hearings during February. It is not clear at this
time if the draft legislation will incorporate a grants
component or what funding level will be proposed.
Utility leaders attending the January 3 meeting
included: Bill Brant and Bonnie Wells, Miami Dade (FL)
Water and Sewer District; Howard Neukrug and Bernie
Brunwasser, Philadelphia (PA) Water Department; Carrie
Lewis, Milwaukee (WI) Water Works; Jerry Johnson,
Washington, DC Water and Sewer Authority; Jim Canaday,
Alexandria (VA) Sanitation Authority; Bill Schatz,
Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District; Sheila Cohen,
Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission (MD); Joe Gehin,
Wausau (WI) Water Works; Paul Pinault, Naragansett Bay
Commission (RI); and Rick Seymour, Nashua (NH)
Wastewater Treatment Facility. Staff from the Water
Environment Federation, American Water Works
Association, Association of Metropolitan Sewerage
Agencies, and Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies
also participated in the meeting. (TSW)
GAO Reports on Water Infrastructure Funding
Programs The U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO)
has released a report on federal assistance for water
infrastructure that was requested by the Senate
Environment and Public Works Committee. The GAO study
provides information on federal and state spending from
1991 through 2000. Based on information from 46 states,
the GAO reports that revolving loan funds made about $25
billion available during this period, with about $10.1
billion coming from state sources. GAO also found 56
different state-sponsored grant programs for drinking
water and/or wastewater infrastructure. The report,
Water Infrastructure: Information on Federal and State
Financial Assistance, GAO-02-134 (November 30, 2001) is
available in PDF format at the GAO web site: http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?gao-02-134.(TSW)
Congress Approves Brownfields Bill As Congress
Adjourns Before adjourning the first session of
the 107th Congress, the House and Senate passed the
first and only major environment piece of legislation
for 2001. H.R. 2869, the "Small Business Liability
Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act" would promote
redevelopment of polluted properties, or brownfields, by
authorizing $250 million annually over the next five
years. The legislation has the support of EPA and
President Bush is expected to sign the bill into law.
After passage EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman
stated, "this important action addresses many areas that
were of significant importance to the President as we
move forward with the assessment and cleanup of what are
environmental eyesores. It recognizes the importance of
our state and local partners by increasing funding and
granting them more flexibility." More significant to
many supporters of the legislation, including small
business owners, is what the regulatory relief the bill
is designed to provide. By amending the current
Superfund law, H.R. 2869 would exempt businesses that
disposed less than 100 gallons of liquid or less than
200 pounds of solid hazardous waste on sites from
liability. In addition, businesses with less than 100
workers who dispose only municipal solid waste at a
superfund site are also exempted. The bill received
strong bipartisan support early in the congressional
session but stalled due to a debate over whether the
Davis-Bacon act, which requires prevailing wages to
workers at federally funded construction sites would
apply. Language was ultimately added to ensure
prevailing wages would apply, over objections from
several House and Senate republicans. (JKS)
Water Security Funds Still Up in the
Air When Congress reconvenes later this month for
the second session of the 107th Congress, a joint
House-Senate conference committee will work out
differences between two versions of legislation to fund
water and wastewater security, according to sources on
Capitol Hill. Prior to adjourning for the year on
December 20, 2001 the Senate passed (S. 1608), which
would authorize $50 million over six years for drinking
water and wastewater utilities to assist with current
and planned security measures. The House passed its
version (H.R. 3178) on December 12, 2001, which would
authorize $60 million over five years. Other sources of
funding for water and wastewater security may come from
a $175.6 million allocation to EPA for counter terrorism
measures as part of the fiscal 2002 defense
appropriations bill (H.R. 3338) and a separate
bioterrorism bill (H.R. 3448). It is not clear how much
of the EPA allocation in the defense appropriations bill
will be spent on water and wastewater security since
most of the money is to be allocated to the Agency's
superfund program, its science and technology program,
and its state and tribal assistance program. EPA, with
congressional oversight, will determine how the
remaining allocation is to be spent. (H.R. 3448), the
bioterrorism bill, which passed the House on December
12, 2001 contains $120 million for drinking water
vulnerability assessments and emergency response plans.
However, a senate version of the bioterrorism bill (S.
1765) does not contain money for drinking water or
wastewater security projects. (JKS)
White House OMB Office Recommend TMDL, Arsenic
Rules Be Reviewed The Bush Administration should
review several environmental regulations, including the
proposed total maximum daily load (TMDL) and arsenic
rules, to ensure they are based on sound science and the
benefits outweigh the costs, according to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). In a report titled "Making
Sense of Regulation" the OMB office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) list 23 federal regulations
that are "high priority regulatory policy issues" and
should be reviewed to ensure they are not "obsolete,
outmoded, or could be updated." The TMDL rule is already
under an 18-month EPA review, which began October 2001.
The Arsenic rule is scheduled to become final on
February 22 and will lower the current 50 parts per
billion standard to 10 ppb. The OIRA is charged with
analyzing whether the benefit of federal regulations
outweigh the costs to states, local communities, and
citizens. Other notable environmental regulations, which
should receive cost-benefit analysis include new source
review regulations under the Clean Air Act and energy
conservation standards for central air conditioners and
hear pumps. For the complete report go to http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/costbenefitreport.pdf
(JKS)
EPA Extends Comment Period for the Proposed
Establishment of Electronic Reporting/Electronic Records
Rule EPA announced in the Federal Register on
January 3 that its is extending by an additional 30 days
the comment period on its proposed rule for
establishment of electronic reporting and electronic
records (visit: frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2002_register&docid=fr03ja02-10.pdf
On August 31, 2001 (66 FR 46162), EPA proposed
conditions under which the Agency would allow submission
of electronic documents and maintenance of electronic
records to satisfy federal environmental reporting and
record keeping requirements in EPA's regulations. The
comment period is being extended by 30 days until
February 27 to provide the public with additional time
to evaluate and comment upon the complex provisions of
this proposed rule. Two additional public meetings on
the proposed rule's record keeping provisions, to be
held before the public comment period closes are: (1)
January 17, 10:00 am - 5:30 p.m. at The Wyndham
Washington, 1400 M Street, NW, Washington, DC; and (2)
January 31, 2002, 10:00 a.m. - 5:30 p.m. (CST) at the
Holiday Inn Select, 4440 W. Airport Freeway, Irving, TX.
For further information contact: David Schwarz, Office
of Environmental Information, U.S. EPA, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20460, (202)
260-2710 or Evi Huffer at (202) 260-8791. (SJH)
NBP Completes EMS Auditor's Guidance The
National Biosolids Partnership's (NBP) Management
Committee approved on January 2 its final Environmental
Management System (EMS) Blueprint document - EMS
Auditor's Guidance. This document provides the guidance
for the creation of an independent, third party EMS
verification program. The goal of this Guidance is to
ensure that the requirements and processes of the NBP
EMS Third Party Verification are clearly established and
communicated, and to ensure that the EMS's of
participating biosolids organizations are evaluated in a
fair and consistent manner that corresponds with the
expectations of the NBP. The Auditor's Guidance and the
other EMS Blueprint documents can be viewed in the EMS
Guidance section (http://biosolids.policy.net/emsguide/)
on the NBP web site - http://www.biosolids.org/. The
Guidance summarizes the NBP EMS Third Party Verification
approach and addresses the following objectives: (1)
Introduces EMS auditors to the National Biosolids
Partnership, the NBP EMS Program, and the NBP Third
Party Verification; (2) Communicates the requirements
for achieving NBP EMS Program Verification, including
the specific requirements associated with the 17
elements of the NBP's Elements of an Environmental
Management System for Biosolids (EMS Elements); (3)
Outlines processes and procedures associated with the
NBP EMS Third Party Verification; and (4) Presents the
qualifications and requirements that NBP EMS auditors
must meet. The document emerges from a nine month
concerted effort among a diverse group of members
including WEF, of both an Auditor Guidance Development
and EMS Program Advisory Groups to translate last year's
Third Party Verification Recommendations into concrete
and clear auditor guidance. The document also provides
interpretations of certain key terms currently contained
in the interim final draft of the EMS Elements document.
There was full consensus among the members of both
Groups that this document clearly reflects - and
communicates - the intent, expectations, and
requirements of the NBP's EMS Program, will provide the
basis for consistent and fair independent third party
audits, and will strongly support the NBP's goal of
promoting environmentally sound and publicly accepted
biosolids management practices. (SJH)
Quote of the Week: "The degree to which
scientific disputes have become important to federal
policy has become greater. I think there is a real
thirst for hearing from scientists now because so many
issues deal with science." -- David Goldston, Chief of
Staff, House Science Committee, as reported in The
Hill newspaper, January 2.
This Week in Washington is provided by the Water
Environment Federation, Alexandria, VA. To receive This
Week in Washington by e-mail, contact Lisa Scott, (703)
684-2400 ext. 7741, lscott@wef.org. For
more information on this week's stories, please contact
the WEF Government Affairs staff member whose initials
appear at the end of the item in which you are
interested. TSW -Tim Williams (703) 684-2437, twilliams@wef.org;
JKS - Jim Sullivan, (703) 684-2436, jsullivan@wef.org:
SRT - Sharon Thomas, (703) 684-2423, sthomas@wef.org;
SJH - Sam Hadeed (703) 684-2418, shadeed@wef.org;
EDM - Eugene DeMichele, (703) 684-2438, edmichele@wef.org;
AMWA - Michael Archeneaux, michael@amwa.net.
This Week in Washington is available on-line at www.wef.org/GovtAffairs
|