This page is maintained by
the National Academies Office
of News and Public Information Web group. Craig
Hicks Managing Editor Tom Roberts Deputy Managing
Editor Lauren Morello Online
Producer Jonathan Waldman Web Outreach
Specialist Contact us by e-mail news@nas.edu
| |
|
Current Visa Restrictions
Interfere with U.S. Science and Engineering Contributions to
Important National Needs
Statement from Bruce
Alberts, President, National Academy of Sciences, Wm. A. Wulf,
President, National Academy of Engineering, and Harvey Fineberg,
President, Institute of Medicine
Dec. 13, 2002
To make
our nation safer, it is extremely important that our visa policy not
only keep out foreigners who intend to do us harm, but also
facilitate the acceptance of those who bring us considerable
benefit. The professional visits of foreign scientists and engineers
and the training of highly qualified foreign students are important
for maintaining the vitality and quality of the U.S. research
enterprise. This research, in turn, underlies national security and
the health and welfare of both our economy and society. But recent
efforts by our government to constrain the flow of international
visitors in the name of national security are having serious
unintended consequences for American science, engineering, and
medicine. The evidence we have collected from the U.S. scientific
community reveals that ongoing research collaborations have been
hampered; that outstanding young scientists, engineers, and health
researchers have been prevented from or delayed in entering this
country; that important international conferences have been canceled
or negatively impacted; and that such conferences will be moved out
of the United States in the future if the situation is not
corrected. Prompt action is needed.
Under current rules,
consular officials send many visa applications back to the United
States for sequential security clearances by several agencies,
leading to long delays and backlogs. In addition, consular officials
in some countries are denying visas by telling applicants – even
high-ranking officials from major research institutions – that there
is fear that they may try to remain in the United States. Consular
officers are subject to criminal penalties if they grant a visa to
someone who subsequently commits a terrorist act in the United
States. Unfortunately, there are currently no offsetting incentives
for consular officers to serve the national interest by facilitating
scientific exchanges.
The list of those who have been
prevented from entering the United States includes scholars asked to
speak at major conferences, distinguished professors invited to
teach at our universities, and even foreign associates of our
Academies. It includes research collaborators for U.S. laboratories
whose absence not only halts projects, but also compromises
commitments made in long-standing international cooperative
agreements. It includes scientists from countries such as Iran and
Pakistan whose exclusion from this country blocks our efforts to
build allied educational and scientific institutions in those parts
of the world. Perhaps most seriously, the list also includes large
numbers of outstanding young graduate and postdoctoral students who
contribute in many ways to the U.S. research enterprise and our
economy.
In order to correct these problems as rapidly as
possible, we pledge the help of the U.S. scientific community and
urgently call upon the U.S. government to implement an effective and
timely visa screening procedure for foreign scientists, engineers,
and medical researchers, one that is consistent with the twin goals
of maintaining the health of science and technology in the United
States and protecting our nation's security. We ask the Department
of State and its consular officials to recognize that, in addition
to their paramount responsibility to deny visas to potential
terrorists, the long-term security of the United States depends on
admitting scholars who benefit our nation.
Possible
mechanisms for streamlining the process without compromising
security might include:
· Reinstating a
procedure of pre-security clearance for scientists and engineers
with the proper credentials; · Instituting a
special visa category for established scientists, engineers, and
health researchers; and · Involving the U.S.
scientific and technical community in determining areas of
particular security concern.
The U.S. research
community can assist consular officials by providing appropriate
documentation for those foreign citizens who are engaged in
collaborations with our scientists and engineers.
An
approach that welcomes qualified foreign scientists, engineers,
health professionals, and students serves three general purposes in
support of national goals. We outline these briefly
below.
Harnessing international cooperation for
counterterrorism. The National Academies have been working with
foreign scientists and engineers on several efforts directly related
to combating terrorism. Last September visa restrictions came within
one day of forcing the cancellation of an important meeting in
Washington of our Committee on U.S.-Russian Cooperation on Nuclear
Non-Proliferation. This committee's responsibilities include
assuring that nuclear weapons-grade materials are under control and
out of the hands of terrorists. It required intervention at the
highest levels of the State Department to gain the needed visas.
Similar collaborations are under way in many other venues, and these
require that we welcome qualified foreigners to our nation without
restrictions or delays.
Building stronger allies through
scientific and technological cooperation. It is clearly in our
national interest to help developing countries fight diseases such
as AIDS, improve their agricultural production, establish new
industries, and generally raise their standard of living. There is
no better way to provide that help than to train young people from
such countries to become broadly competent in relevant fields of
science and technology. Yet our new visa restrictions are making
this more difficult. For example, several hundred outstanding young
Pakistanis, carefully selected by their government as potential
leaders of universities there and accepted for graduate training in
U.S. universities, experienced a 90 percent denial rate in applying
for U.S. visas.
Maintaining U.S. global leadership in
science and technology. Throughout our history, this nation has
benefited enormously from an influx of foreign-born scientists and
engineers whose talents and energy have driven many of our advances
in scientific research and technological development. Over half a
century ago, Albert Einstein, Enrico Fermi, and many others from
Western Europe laid the foundations for our global leadership in
modern science. More recently, immigrants from other parts of the
world -- most notably China, India, and Southeast Asia -- have
joined our research institutions and are now the leaders of
universities and technology-based industries. Many others have
returned to take leadership positions in their home countries, and
now are among the best ambassadors that our country has
abroad.
Approximately half of the graduate students currently
enrolled in the physical sciences and engineering at U.S.
universities come from other nations. These foreign students are
essential for much of the federally funded research carried out at
academic laboratories.
Scientific and engineering research
has become a truly global enterprise. International conferences,
collaborative research projects, and the shared use of large
experimental facilities are essential for progress at the frontiers
of these areas. If we allow visa restrictions to stop international
collaborations at our experimental facilities, then these facilities
will cease to attract international support. Moreover, our
scientists and engineers will no longer enjoy reciprocal access to
important facilities abroad. And if we continue to exclude foreign
researchers from conferences held in the United States, then those
meetings may cease to take place in this country in the future,
depriving many American scientists of the opportunity to participate
in them.
In short, the U.S. scientific, engineering, and
health communities cannot hope to maintain their present position of
international leadership if they become isolated from the rest of
the world. We seek the help of the U.S. government in implementing
effective and timely screening systems for issuing visas to
qualified foreign scientists and students who bring great benefit to
our country. We view this as an urgent matter, one that must be
promptly addressed if the United States is to meet both its national
security and economic development goals.
Bruce Alberts
President National Academy of Sciences
Wm. A.
Wulf President National Academy of Engineering
Harvey
Fineberg President Institute of Medicine
| |