ILW.COM - The Immigration
Portal November 27, 2001
GUEST
COMMENTARY: INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS AND US NATIONAL
SECURITY
BY GARY ENDELMAN
DISCLAIMER:Gary Endelman practices immigration
law at BP America Inc. The opinions expressed in this
column are purely personal and do not represent the
views or beliefs of BP Amoco Corporation in any way.
This article is copyrighted by ILW.COM and is reprinted
with permission. You can read otherarticles by Mr.
Endelman, and subscribe to future articles
at www.ilw.com
The Institute of
International Education just published its annual review
on foreign students in the US. What did they find?
While, in sheer numbers, total enrollment continues to
rise, the comparative percentage attracted by America as
opposed to other nations has dramatically declined. This
decline comes at a time of unprecedented questioning at
all levels of America society and government concerning
foreign students and whether they should be allowed in
at all. Throughout the land, FBI agents visit campuses,
question Islamic students, and pressure university
administrations to provide the most personal information
on them. Actions that would have previously been
considered unthinkable, such as racial profiling, are
now accepted in the name of homeland security. Acting
solely though executive order, not even seeking the
imprimatur of Congress, the President has effectively
suspended the great writ of habeas corpus and instituted
secret military tribunals that can operate without any
judicial review right here to accuse, prosecute, judge
and punish these same international students. The
message that goes forth to the world, the same world
that we claim to want on our side in the war against
terrorism, is that we regard their best and brightest
minds as a clear and present threat to our national
security who can come, if at all, only under the most
extreme scrutiny and intense suspicion.
At the start of
the current school term, 425,433 foreign students
enrolled at US institutions of higher education; this is
double the number in British universities, the country
with the next highest foreign student population. While
we remain the place that most international students
want to go, our dominance is less than it used to be. In
1982 39% of students who left their homeland for
learning came here; in 1995, by contrast, our market
share was only 30%. In the past decade other European
and Western societies have initiated impressive
recruitment efforts on a coordinated national scale to
attract international students to their colleges, and it
has paid off handsomely. Since 1994, for example, there
has been a 73% surge in Australia's foreign population
compared to a US increase of only 21%. France just
announced a campaign to lure 500,000 new international
students, and Germany is spending $16 million on its
recruitment effort. There is not to say that we have
anything to worry about right now. While our market
share is down, the US remains the preferred destination
of most foreign students. In fact, with a grand total of
547,867 during the 2000-2001 academic year, the US
international student population saw a 6% spike, the
largest such increase since 1979.
While we remain
the place to go for most international students right
now, the trends are obvious and disturbing. At a time
when the competition for these students is increasing,
our post-September 11th national trauma makes us less
tolerant of their presence, and more inclined to view
them not as an opportunity but a deadly menace. Far from
creating new and innovative ways to bring in more
foreign students, the US government is considering a
moratorium on any new student visas or the
implementation of stringent security checks at every
stage of the application and visa issuing process. Make
it hard for them to come, watch what they do when they
are here, and make sure they don't try to stay - hardly
a program designed to make our visitors feel welcome in
their adopted home.
Should student
visas be more closely monitored? International students
are already given the third, fourth and fifth degrees by
overzealous consular officers. They represent a tiny
fraction of the total number of nonimmigrant visas
issued each year - roughly 7.1 million according to the
State Department data for FY 2000. All F-1 applicants
are processed through the State Department's name check
database known as the Consular Lookout and Support
System (CLASS). Beyond that, the State Department has
adopted a special headquarters clearance system for
students from suspect nations associated with
state-sponsored terrorism or who might have access to
sensitive technologies, particularly dual use technology
that has potential military application. At a recent
Congressional hearing, Mary Ryan, Assistant Secretary of
State for Consular Affairs, testified that the name
check system revealed no adverse information about the
19 terrorists who carried out the September 11th
attacks, including Hani Hanjour, the pilot of the jet
that crashed into the Pentagon, and the only one of the
19 suspects who entered the country was on a student
(M-1) visa. If the FBI learned anything about Mr.
Hanjour, they did not share it with the Department of
State. Finally, State has prudently instituted a 20 day
waiting period before any student visa for an applicant
from a troubled country can be issued so that the
appropriate security check can be conducted. The issue
is not whether America should protect itself but
whether, once the necessary clearances have been
obtained, foreign students can rely upon the protection
of our laws and freedoms to enrich their educational
experience. Undue laxity should not be replaced with
mindless inquisition that only serves to antagonize our
guests without making us one bit safer.
Just another
typical bleeding-heart complaint, you say, from a
left-wing wacko who doesn't know the country is at war?
Hardly. Let us get real about what is at stake here. If
these students need us, we need them a lot more.
International students poured more than $11 billion into
the US economy last year. The primary source of funds
for 67% of these students came from personal and family
sources. More than 3/4 of them get most of their money
from international sources. They pay full tuition that
bankrolls the graduate programs of every major
university, and their presence makes possible the
maintenance and enhancement of faculty staffing levels
in all science, technology and mathematics disciplines.
Graduate education in America could not survive in its
present form without them, and those who run academia
know it. Did you know that the healthiest branch of
American higher education is at the local and community
college level? Why? Perhaps the answer is, in no small
measure, to the fact that, while foreign students are
flocking to all kinds of American schools, the strongest
growth since 1993, an increase of some 50%, has taken
place precisely at these two-year
institutions.
The economy of
the 21st century is based on knowledge and the county
with the best talent will be the most competitive and
the most powerful. If America is to retain its position
as king of the hill, we need to be the leader in
attracting all forms of capital - including human
capital. It is folly to believe that we need foreign
students any less than we need foreign investment or
trade. It is equally dangerous to assume that we can
continue to sustain our leadership in the world without
being able to draw upon the most innovative minds of all
lands. That is where the current assault on civil
liberties comes in. Americans should not oppose this out
of noble sentiment or high minded altruism. We should
not cry out in order to be kind to these poor foreign
students. We should say "no" to those who equate the
preservation of domestic tranquility with ripping up the
Bill of Rights precisely because it will turn off and
keep out the very international students and scholars we
need, perhaps now more than ever before, to invigorate
the American way of life and nurture the economy that
makes it possible. If we, as a people under attack, turn
away from the openness, the tolerance, the welcoming
diversity, the instinct for individual liberty that made
us so attractive to these students and scholars in the
first place, we will not only be throwing away our
natural advantages over the more culturally rigid
societies in Europe and Asia for no good reason, but we
will be doing so without any clear understanding or
informed appreciation of how much we have lost. Remember
the admonition of old: He who disturbeth his own house,
shall inherit the
wind. |