Copyright 2001 eMediaMillWorks, Inc.
(f/k/a Federal
Document Clearing House, Inc.)
Federal Document Clearing House
Congressional Testimony
March 22, 2001, Thursday
SECTION: CAPITOL HILL HEARING TESTIMONY
LENGTH: 3307 words
COMMITTEE:
HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS
SUBCOMMITTEE:
LABOR, HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, AND EDUCATION
HEADLINE: TESTIMONY LABOR HHS APPROPRIATIONS
TESTIMONY-BY: CARL SUTER , DIRECTOR
AFFILIATION: COUNCIL OF STATE ADMINISTRATORS OF
VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION
BODY: Testimony on behalf
of the COUNCIL OF STATE ADMINISTRATORS OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION before the
House Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education
and Related Agencies of the Committee on Appropriations of the United States
House of Representatives on Thursday, March 22, 2001 at 9:30 a.m. As presented
by: Carl Suter Director Vocational Rehabilitation Program Dept./ Human
Services/ORS Springfield, 111. Mr. Chairman, and members of the Committee, I am
the Director of the Vocational Rehabilitation Program for the State of Illinois
and a Member of the Council of State Administrators of Vocational Rehabilitation
(the CSAVR). On behalf of the CSAVR, I appreciate having the opportunity to
appear before this committee today to share with you our deep concerns regarding
the funding of the State Grant Program of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended. First, let me explain who we are so that you will better appreciate why
I am here with you today. The Council of State Administrators of Vocational
Rehabilitation is comprised of the chief administrative officers of the State
Rehabilitation Agencies in the states, the territories, and the District. These
agencies provide services to eligible persons with mental and/or physical
disabilities in order that they can take their place in
competitive employment. You in Congress created the Public Vocational
Rehabilitation Program nearly 80 years ago this year. Indeed, this is truly one
of your success stories in which I hope all of you take pride. While the
Rehabilitation Act is the cornerstone of our Nation's commitment to assisting
eligible people with
disabilities to obtain competitive
employment and to live independent and productive lives, it is severely under
funded. Indeed, nearly 30 % of the States received less than a cost of living
this present fiscal year. While Congress may have thought it was funding each of
the States at least at the cost-of-living rate, this was not the case. I cannot
believe that Congress meant this to happen, but it did! And I might add that
more and more States are being added to that group every year. When one
considers that a Louis Harris and Associates study estimates that two out of
every three adults with a
disability are unemployed, and that
the Rehabilitation Program has the resources to provide services to render
persons with
disabilities employable to only one in twenty
eligible people, this under funding constitutes an unacceptable tragedy for the
millions of people with
disabilities who need services in order
to become employed, yet are unable to receive them. The arguments that it is
better to put people to work and make them taxpayers as opposed to living off
the taxpayers on welfare, in Institutions, or worse, have often been made.
Common sense tells us these arguments are true. Instead, we are told that we are
considered an entitlement or mandatory spending and, therefore, under a
so-called "cap". This may well be. But the problem that is growing needs to be
addressed. As you know, the authorizing law provides that each state is to
receive an allotment based on whatever Congress appropriates if that State can
provide the matching resources. The law also provides that at least a cost of
living be added to the total appropriations each year and is to be considered a
minimum, not a "cap". As you know, the past few years, Congress has authorized
considerable additional resources for Special Education. Now those young men and
women who have been in special education are turning to vocational
rehabilitation for services as adults. This "transition" is demanding increased
resources to serve these individuals. We believe that if we in fact can serve
individuals with
disabilities leaving school, that will deflect
them from having to get on SSI and can help them get into the world of work and
toward self- sufficiency. To illustrate this point, in my home state of Illinois
we have adopted a world class service initiative. Part of this initiative deals
with serving youth in Special Education as they "transition" to life after
school. Rick is a young man of 20 with mental retardation who we began working
with when he was in Special Education in high school. As a result of receiving
Vocational Rehabilitation services, Rick has been able to move from a world of
SSI into a world of competitive employment. Instead of receiving approximately
$550 per month on SSI and working in a sheltered workshop, he is now employed at
a local hospital making almost $9 per hour with benefits. Rick's story is
typical and one we could replicate many times over if we had the additional
funding. With the success that many of our states are having with Temporary
Assistance for Needy Families (
TANF), it is important to
understand that vocational rehabilitation is also a key player in needing to
serve some of this population. Individuals with
disabilities
who have been on the
TANF caseloads are also knocking on our
doors in search of assistance to help them secure education and training that
can lead them to employment. As you may also be aware, many states are now
focused on implementing the Olmstead decision. Vocational rehabilitation will
have a major role in helping individuals with
disabilities get
jobs so as to help them be integrated more fully into society. Through Illinois
Governor Ryan's community reintegration program, we are helping people with
disabilities move from nursing homes into the community. As we
do that, one of the important pillars in a person's life that needs to be
established is employment. Elizabeth is a 50-year-old woman from Robbins,
Illinois who has struggled with mental illness for years and has been living in
a nursing home. Each month, Elizabeth received only $30 of her Social Security
benefits - the rest went directly to the nursing home. Although she had not
worked for over eight years, the Illinois Vocational Rehabilitation program
helped her get the training she needed so she could go to work. Today, Elizabeth
has accomplished two of her goals in life: she has moved out of the nursing home
into independent living and is working in competitive employment. As you are
also aware, Congress placed even greater responsibility upon the State
Vocational Rehabilitation Program, with the passage and promises of the
"Americans with
Disabilities Act" (ADA). The ADA promises to
expand opportunities for all Americans with
disabilities. If
Congress in its wisdom really meant to do just that, does it not also need to
provide the means to accomplish this mission? It is our belief that it is vital
that the State Vocational Rehabilitation Program have the resources available to
assist people with
disabilities to fully realize the promise of
this landmark legislation. Basic State Service Grants are the lifeblood of the
Vocational Rehabilitation Program, financing the provision of vocational
rehabilitation services to eligible individuals with mental and physical
disabilities for placement in competitive employment. Illinois,
as most states, has been able to get sufficient state funding in order to fully
match the Federal appropriation. Together, these funds pen-nit State
Rehabilitation Agencies to provide, or to contract with private organizations
and agencies to provide, individualized, comprehensive services to eligible
persons with mental and/or physical
disabilities, for the
purpose of rendering these individuals employed and independent. Such services
may include evaluation; comprehensive diagnostic services; counseling; physical
restoration; rehabilitation engineering; the provision of various kinds of
training and training supplies, tools and equipment; prosthetic devices;
placement; transportation; post-employment services; and "any other service"
necessary to rehabilitate an individual into employment. For Fiscal Year 1999,
the latest year for which the Federal Government has statistics, the
Rehabilitation Services Administration advises that the $2,247,000,000
appropriated for Basic State Vocational Rehabilitation provided services
designed to lead to gainful employment for over 1.2 million people with
disabilities. Of this number, 230,000 were placed in
competitive employment. Despite this expenditure, there still are not sufficient
funds to serve all those eligible, disabled people who have the potential and
desire to work and who need rehabilitation and training services to obtain
employment and self-sufficiency. In carrying out the Congressional mandate to
give priority of service to the rehabilitation of individuals who are severely
disabled, State Agencies have found that the costs -- in time, effort, and money
for services -- are much greater than the cost of rehabilitating people less
severely disabled. At the same time, it is alarming to note that the purchasing
power of the resources available has remained virtually stagnant since 1980.
With these statistics in mind, the CSAVR strongly urges that the Congress assist
us in facing this challenge by providing Federal appropriations for Basic State
Vocational Rehabilitation Services with a 10% (including the CPI, or
approximately $240 million) increase over the FY2001 appropriation. The CSAVR
estimates that nearly 125,000 more persons will receive services and over 25,000
more will be placed in competitive employment. The justification for higher
funding levels stems from the purpose for which the money is spent--the
prevention of an incalculable waste of human potential, a purpose on which no
price tag can be placed. Over the decades, Vocational Rehabilitation has more
than paid for itself by helping persons with
disabilities
become gainfully employed; by increasing their earning capacity; by freeing
family members to work; and/or by decreasing the amount of welfare payments,
health services, and social services they might need; as well as by assisting
them to become taxpayers. Appropriating additional monies for Vocational
Rehabilitation Services has helped reduce the Federal Deficit. Indeed, the
Congressional Budget Office has stated that "a reduction of funds for
rehabilitation ... would generate increases in other parts of the federal and
state budgets." Funds appropriated for Vocational Rehabilitation are a sound
investment of the Public's money. OTHER PROGRAMS AUTHORIZED BY THE
REHABILITATION ACT The Rehabilitation Act is recognized as the most complete and
well-balanced piece of legislation in the human services field. In addition to
the Basic State Vocational Rehabilitation Services Program, the Act contains
provisions for (1) an innovation and expansion program; (2) a training program;
(3) a research program; (4) a comprehensive services for independent living
program; (5) a supported employment program; and, among others, (6) special
projects and demonstration efforts. The Council strongly supports adequate
funding for all Sections of the Act. I appreciate the opportunity to appear
before this important Subcommittee today and am available to answer any
questions about this Program and our recommendations.
LOAD-DATE: March 23, 2001, Friday