Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company  
The Boston Globe
October 10, 2002, Thursday ,THIRD EDITION
SECTION: GLOBE NORTH; Pg. 1

LENGTH: 1058 words

HEADLINE: GLOBE NORTH 1;
WELFARE RULES FAIL ACTIVISTS' REALITY CHECK BUSH'S LATEST PLAN ADDS WORK HOURS, SHORTENS TRAINING

BYLINE: By Brenda J. Buote, Globe Staff

BODY:
As a single mother, Sabrina Webby spent years struggling to make ends meet, cashing state welfare checks for a chance to make a better life for herself and her young daughter. By chance, she met an advocate for the poor at a Malden shelter who became a friend and mentor, and convinced Webby to go back to school and earn a college degree.

It took nearly six years of struggle, of schlepping her child to study groups at Bunker Hill Community College and getting by on scant public assistance, but today Webby is off welfare and working full time, helping other families end the cycle of poverty.

   She owns a two-family home in Everett and commutes to Boston, where she works as a community organizer for Homes for Families, a nonprofit organization that strives to end family homelessness. As an activist, she has been closely following the debate on Capitol Hill over welfare reform. As a former welfare recipient, she has some sage advice for federal lawmakers: Get real.

"People think that a job is an easy answer, that instead of welfare people should just go to work," said Webby, who is now in her early 30s and has two children. "But there are so many other issues. Child care. Transportation. Your child's health. Your own health. For people who have an education, who have things pretty well together, it's tough. For those who are homeless and trying to work, raise their children, and look for housing, it is nearly impossible."

Webby attributes her own success to the fact that she was able to receive welfare benefits while working part-time and attending classes. As part of this year's reauthorization of a 1996 federal welfare law, President Bush wants Congress to require welfare recipients put in a 40-hour work week, compared with the 20 hours the Commonwealth now requires. Under the president's plan, welfare recipients would have just three months to overcome personal barriers to employment. After that, only 16 hours of job training or education would count toward the full-time work requirement. The president's goal is to have 70 percent of all welfare recipients working full time by 2007.

A laudable goal, perhaps. But is it realistic?

In the suburbs north of Boston, advocates for the poor argue that many of the state's neediest families would be unable to meet the proposed demands.

"I feel this would make already punitive legislation more punitive," said Nancy Schwoyer, executive director of Wellspring House in Gloucester, a community-based organization that strives to address the needs of low-income families. "It's inhuman to expect a head of household who is on welfare to work 40 hours a week, given the stress that this would place on families. Already, there aren't enough day-care slots to meet demand, and often times the jobs that pay enough aren't near public transportation."

Today, only 6 percent of the state's 46,035 adult welfare recipients hold jobs, and 91 percent are exempt from work requirements. Roughly 30 percent of those who are exempt have a documented disability. Many others are caring for children under the ageof 6.

State officials have said it would be impossible for the state to meet the president's proposal without restructuring state law, spending additional state dollars and reordering priorities at the Massachusetts Department of Transitional Assistance, which provides training and services, such as child care, for those clients most prepared for jobs.

Between February 1995 and January 2002, the state's welfare caseload dropped 55 percent, from 102,993 to 46,035 adults. State officials credit the decline to a strong economy, an emphasis on job search and training, and time limits that restrict many welfare recipients in the Commonwealth to 24 months of cash assistance in a five-year period.

State officials have said the high percentage of the caseload that is not required to work reflects the fact that the rolls are down dramatically since 1995, leaving on welfare the neediest and hardest to employ.

Bush's plan would abolish the federal waivers that allowed nearly 20 states, including Massachusetts, to experiment with welfare changes before the federal law was enacted. In 1995, the state requested and was granted a waiver to set up its own rules. Under this year's reauthorization, Bush wants Congress to rescind those waivers, forcing the state to move funds out of transportation, education and training programs and into services for harder-to-place welfare recipients. Federal lawmakers have until Dec. 30 to take action.

"The waiver has allowed Massachusetts to take into consideration the particular resources and ways in which the policies can be implemented in a practical way," said Donna Haig Friedman, director of the Center for Social Policy at the McCormack Institute at UMass-Boston. "If there's a one-size fits all policy implemented across the whole country, particularly if it requires 40 hours of work a week, we already know that will not work - the 20-hour work requirement is difficult for many families to actually carry through on. It's a complete setup for failure in which families and children end up paying the price."

Some local activists said that Bush's plan could force some parents to leave their children in unsafe or unhealthy day care situations in order to meet the demands of a full-time work schedule, particularly given the fact that many entry-level jobs require employees to work second or third shift, when child care is nearly impossible to find.

"Bush's plan is very troubling," said Beth Hogan, executive director of the North Shore Community Action Program, an agency that advocates for the poor and helps about 10,000 people each year through job training programs, among other services. "We'd like to see education and training count toward the work requirement, and a guarantee that welfare recipients can continue to receive subsidies until they can move along a career path and earn a living wage."

With rents up nearly 40 percent in the Greater Boston area since 1995, Hogan noted that many families are paying as much as $1,200 a month for a modest two-bedroom apartment. "Even if you're making $9 an hour, you're still going to be struggling to make ends meet," Hogan said. "Education and training is going to be the linchpin to moving people out of poverty."

LOAD-DATE: October 11, 2002