Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company The Boston
Globe
March 12, 2002, Tuesday ,THIRD EDITION
SECTION: NATIONAL/FOREIGN; Pg. A3
LENGTH: 514 words
HEADLINE:
MARRIAGE IS GOAL IN WELFARE BILL
BYLINE:
By Mary Leonard, Globe Staff
BODY: WASHINGTON - The GOP lawmaker who will guide new welfare
legislation through the House said yesterday that his top priorities are
promoting marriage and requiring work for people who "aren't doing anything" for
their welfare checks.
Representative Wally
Herger of Chico, Calif., chairman of the human resources subcommittee of the
House Ways and Means Committee, told reporters he would try to work with House
Democrats on a bipartisan bill.
But Herger said he was prepared to move his own
version of a bill reauthorizing the 1996 welfare overhaul to the House
floor by May.
A father of nine children, Herger said
he hoped to provide financial incentives for states to create programs to
encourage single mothers to marry the fathers of their children.
"It's tough enough to raise children with two parents, let alone one,"
Herger said.
Saying there were "very negative results"
for children raised in poverty with one parent, he said, "We must work to do
something about it."
Herger called welfare re
author i zation "one of the most important pieces of legislation coming through
the House this year" and said he agreed with President Bush that it was
essential to stiffen work requirements for people now receiving federal cash
assistance.
Herger said he was disturbed by data,
collected most recently by the Department of Health and Human Services in
1998-1999, that show that 57.6 percent of those still on welfare are not
working at a job. Since 1996, welfare caseloads are down nearly 60
percent across the country, the result, at least in part, of work requirements
and time limits on federal cash assistance, both provisions of the
welfare law.
Federal law requires states to have
50 percent of welfare recipients in work activity. States then get credit
for moving more clients to work and have considerable flexibility in what they
will require of those still on the rolls. Herger suggested that some states may
be "gaming the system."
Deborah Harris of the
Massachusetts Law Reform Institute said that many of those who continue to
receive welfare today have substantial barriers to work, including
disabilities, substance or domestic abuse issues, or very young
children.
"Half of those remaining on the caseload in
Massachusetts either have serious, identified disabilities or are caring
for someone with a disability," Harris said.
Ninety-one percent of adults on welfare in Massachusetts are
exempt from all work requirements. The state operates under a 1995
welfare-reform waiver that exempts it from the mandates of the federal
welfare law.
Under the president's
welfare proposal, all federal waivers would be abolished. But Herger
indicated that he would examine how well waivers had worked and might allow some
states to continue operating under them.
Massachusetts
welfare officials say that losing the waiver would require a significant
restructuring of the state program. Between 1995 and January 2002, the state's
caseload dropped from 103,472 to 46,150, a 55 percent decline.
Mary Leonard can be reached at mleonard@globe.com.