Bill Summary & Status for the 107th Congress
NEW
SEARCH | HOME | HELP
H.R.2505
Title: To amend title 18, United States Code, to
prohibit human cloning.
Sponsor: Rep Weldon, Dave [FL-15] (introduced
7/16/2001) Cosponsors: 5
Related
Bills: H.RES.214, H.R.1644
Latest
Major Action: 8/3/2001 Senate preparation for floor. Status: Read the second
time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No.
140. b
Jump to: Titles,
Status,
Committees,
Related
Bill Details, Amendments,
Cosponsors,
Summary
TITLE(S): (italics indicate a title for a
portion of a bill)
- POPULAR TITLE(S):
Cloning of Humans bill (identified by CRS)
- SHORT TITLE(S) AS INTRODUCED:
Human Cloning Prohibition Act of
2001
- SHORT TITLE(S) AS REPORTED TO HOUSE:
Human Cloning Prohibition Act of
2001
- SHORT TITLE(S) AS PASSED HOUSE:
Human Cloning Prohibition Act of
2001
- OFFICIAL TITLE AS INTRODUCED:
To amend title 18, United States Code,
to prohibit human cloning.
STATUS: (color indicates Senate actions)
- 7/16/2001:
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 7/17/2001:
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime.
- 7/19/2001:
- Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
- 7/19/2001:
- Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
- 7/24/2001:
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
- 7/24/2001:
- Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 18 - 11.
- 7/27/2001 2:08pm:
- Mr. Armey asked unanimous consent that the Committee on Judiciary have
until 5:00 p.m. on July 28 to file a report on H.R. 2505.
Agreed to without objection.
- 7/27/2001 4:47pm:
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 107-170.
- 7/27/2001 4:48pm:
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 101.
- 7/30/2001 7:01pm:
- Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 214
Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2505
with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as
ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without
instructions. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in
order.
- 7/31/2001 2:42pm:
- Rule H.
Res. 214 passed House.
- 7/31/2001 2:53pm:
- Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res.
214. (consideration: CR H4916-4945;
text of measure as reported in House: CR H4917)
- 7/31/2001 2:54pm:
- H.AMDT.283
Amendment reported by the House Committee on Judiciary. (consideration: H4917;
text: CR H4917)
Amendments printed in the bill and considered as adopted pursuant to the
provisions of H. Res.
214.
- 7/31/2001 2:55pm:
- H.AMDT.283 On
agreeing to the Judiciary amendment Agreed to without objection.
- 7/31/2001 4:07pm:
- H.AMDT.284
Amendment (A002) offered by Mr. Scott. (consideration: CR H4930;
text: CR H4930)
Amendment requires the General Accounting Office to conduct a study to
assess the need (if any) for amendment of the prohibition on human cloning, as
defined in section 301 of title 18, United States Code, as added by this Act
with such study transmitted to Congress within 4 years of enactment of this
Act.
- 7/31/2001 4:11pm:
- H.AMDT.284 On
agreeing to the Scott amendment (A002) Agreed to by voice vote.
- 7/31/2001 4:12pm:
- H.AMDT.285
Amendment (A003) in the nature of a substitute offered by Mr. Greenwood.
(consideration: CR H4931-4943;
text: CR H4931)
Amendment in the nature of a substitute sought to ban the use of human
somatic cell nuclear transfer technology to initiate a pregnancy but allow the
use of somatic cell nuclear transfer technology to clone molecules, DNA,
cells, or tissues; require each individual who intends to perform human
somatic cell nuclear transfer technology to register with the Secretary of
Health and Human Services; sunset the ban ten years after enactment; require
those who break the law to forfeit equipment, other property, and any monetary
gains; and require a study by the Institute of Medicine on the properties of
embryonic, fetal and adult stem cells.
- 7/31/2001 5:26pm:
- H.AMDT.285
The previous question was ordered on the amendment (A003) and on the bill
pursuant to the rule.
- 7/31/2001 5:49pm:
- H.AMDT.285 On
agreeing to the Greenwood amendment (A003) Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 178 -
249 (Roll
no. 302).
- 7/31/2001 5:49pm:
- Ms. Lofgren moved to recommit with instructions to Judiciary.
- 7/31/2001 6:03pm:
- The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was
ordered without objection.
- 7/31/2001 6:21pm:
- On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 175 - 251
(Roll
no. 303). (text: CR H4943)
- 7/31/2001 6:30pm:
- On passage Passed by recorded vote: 265 - 162 (Roll
no. 304).
- 7/31/2001 6:30pm:
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- 8/1/2001:
- Received in the Senate.
- 8/2/2001:
- Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the
First Time.
- 8/3/2001:
- Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General
Orders. Calendar No. 140.
COMMITTEE(S):
RELATED BILL DETAILS: (additional
related bills may be indentified in Status)
Bill: |
Relationship: |
H.RES.214 |
Rule related to H.R.2505 in House |
H.R.1644 |
Related bill as identified by House
committee |
AMENDMENT(S):
1. H.AMDT.283 to
H.R.2505
Amendments printed in the bill and considered as adopted pursuant to the
provisions of H. Res. 214.
Sponsor: House Judiciary (introduced
7/31/2001) Cosponsors:
(none)
Committees: House Judiciary
Latest Major
Action: 7/31/2001 House amendment agreed to. Status: On agreeing to the
Judiciary amendment Agreed to without objection.
2. H.AMDT.284 to
H.R.2505
Amendment requires the General Accounting Office to conduct a study to assess
the need (if any) for amendment of the prohibition on human cloning, as
defined in section 301 of title 18, United States Code, as added by this Act
with such study transmitted to Congress within 4 years of enactment of this
Act.
Sponsor: Rep Scott, Robert C. [VA-3] (introduced 7/31/2001)
Cosponsors: (none)
Latest Major
Action: 7/31/2001 House amendment agreed to. Status: On agreeing to the
Scott amendment (A002) Agreed to by voice vote.
3. H.AMDT.285 to
H.R.2505
Amendment in the nature of a substitute sought to ban the use of human somatic
cell nuclear transfer technology to initiate a pregnancy but allow the use of
somatic cell nuclear transfer technology to clone molecules, DNA, cells, or
tissues; require each individual who intends to perform human somatic cell
nuclear transfer technology to register with the Secretary of Health and Human
Services; sunset the ban ten years after enactment; require those who break
the law to forfeit equipment, other property, and any monetary gains; and
require a study by the Institute of Medicine on the properties of embryonic,
fetal and adult stem cells.
Sponsor: Rep Greenwood, James C. [PA-8]
(introduced 7/31/2001) Cosponsors:
(none)
Latest Major Action: 7/31/2001 House amendment not agreed
to. Status: On agreeing to the Greenwood amendment (A003) Failed by the Yeas
and Nays: 178 - 249 (Roll no. 302).
COSPONSORS(5), ALPHABETICAL [followed by Cosponsors
withdrawn]: (Sort: by date)
Rep Flake, Jeff - 7/23/2001 [AZ-1] |
Rep Kerns, Brian D. - 7/16/2001 [IN-7] |
Rep Kucinich, Dennis J. - 7/16/2001 [OH-10] |
Rep Stupak, Bart - 7/16/2001 [MI-1] |
Rep Wu, David - 7/17/2001 [OR-1] |
SUMMARY AS OF:
7/31/2001--Passed House,
amended. (There are 2 other
summaries)
Human Cloning Prohibition Act of 2001 - Prohibits any person or entity, in or
affecting interstate commerce, from knowingly: (1) performing or attempting to
perform human cloning; (2) participating in such an attempt; (3) shipping or
receiving an embryo produced by human cloning or any product derived from such
embryo; or (4) importing such an embryo or product.
Sets forth criminal and civil penalties.
Provides that nothing in this Act restricts areas of scientific research not
specifically prohibited above, including research in the use of nuclear transfer
or other cloning techniques to produce molecules, DNA, cells other than human
embryos, tissues, organs, plants, or animals other than humans.
Directs the General Accounting Office to assess the need for amendment of
such prohibition, including through: (1) a discussion of new developments, the
need for somatic cell transfer to produce medical advances, current public
attitudes and prevailing ethical views concerning its use, and potential legal
implications of somatic cell transfer research; and (2) a review of any
technological developments that may require technical changes to such
prohibition.