Skip banner Home   Sources   How Do I?   Site Map   What's New   Help  
Search Terms: human cloning
  FOCUS™    
Edit Search
Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed   Previous Document Document 507 of 750. Next Document

Copyright 2001 The Columbus Dispatch  
Columbus Dispatch (Ohio)

July 17, 2001, Tuesday

SECTION: EDITORIAL & COMMENT, Pg. 8A

LENGTH: 187 words

HEADLINE: MISCONCEPTIONS LEAD TO FEARS OF HUMAN CLONING

BODY:
Cloning whole beings for organ harvesting is fine for science and apocalyptic Christian or Muslim fiction. In real life, however, it is most unlikely.

If an adult needs a new liver, kidney or heart, can that person really wait the 15 or so years needed for a clone to grow to the age where his organs are large enough to support the patient's needs? Clones don't grow any faster than normal people and, if they did, then I doubt that a person would want their rapidly aging organs.

As for genetic engineering, why should we fear it any more in clones than in the in- vitro and in-vivo engineering that we will eventually employ?

In the end, some mediocre reasons exist for cloning a person and a very few good ones. If we can bring birth-defect rates below their occurrence in normal conception -- remember, an estimated 50 percent of conceptions result in spontaneous abortions -- then we should accept it as the very expensive and rather eccentric extension of normal conception that it is.

After all, a clone is not its original and, in the end, a baby is a baby is a baby.

Geoffrey Tolle

Columbus

LOAD-DATE: July 17, 2001




Previous Document Document 507 of 750. Next Document
Terms & Conditions   Privacy   Copyright © 2003 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.