Skip banner Home   Sources   How Do I?   Site Map   What's New   Help  
Search Terms: human cloning
  FOCUS™    
Edit Search
Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed   Previous Document Document 32 of 494. Next Document

Copyright 2002 The Houston Chronicle Publishing Company  
The Houston Chronicle

December 29, 2002, Sunday 4 STAR EDITION

SECTION: A; Pg. 2

LENGTH: 421 words

HEADLINE: Experts, lawmakers blast cloning claim ;
Critics: Backlash may cripple research

SOURCE: Houston Chronicle News Services

BODY:
A religious sect's claim to have cloned a human baby has provoked fierce criticism from scientists and lawmakers who said that public outrage might stifle research aimed not at making humans, but at curing diseases.

The claim also drew condemnation by the Vatican.

Many scientists are skeptical of the claim, announced on Friday by a private company linked to the Raelians, a sect that believes space travelers created the human race by cloning. But other experts, along with members of Congress on both sides of the debate over human cloning, said that true or not, the claim could have immense implications.

"What a sad day for science," said Dr. Robert Lanza, medical director of Advanced Cell Technology of Worcester, Mass., a company that has cloned human embryos to provide cells for research but not to create babies. "What they've claimed to have done is both appalling and scientifically irresponsible, and whether or not it's true, they have done a tremendous disservice to all of us in the scientific community. The backlash could cripple an area of medical research that could cure millions of people, and it would be tragic if this announcement results in a ban on all forms of cloning."

Scientists also warned that human cloning carries a high risk of creating children with genetic defects.

Both houses of Congress have been battling over the issue for more than a year. In July 2001, the House voted 265-162 to ban all forms of human cloning. Rival bills have been introduced in the Senate, one seeking to ban all human cloning and the other seeking to ban cloning for reproduction but not for research.

Sen. Bill Frist, R-Tenn., who was just chosen Senate majority leader and favors a ban on all forms of cloning, called the announcement "disturbing."

Lanza and other researchers said it was important to distinguish between two types of cloning. One, reproductive cloning, is used to duplicate a person; the other, therapeutic cloning, is used only to create cells needed for research.

The Vatican joined leading Muslim clerics and Jewish rabbis Saturday in denouncing the cloning claim as immoral, "brutal" and unnatural.

A Vatican statement Saturday noted that the announcement came with no scientific proof and that it "has already given rise to the skepticism and moral condemnation of a great part of the international scientific community." But "the announcement in itself is an expression of a brutal mentality, devoid of any ethical and human consideration," said the statement.



LOAD-DATE: December 30, 2002




Previous Document Document 32 of 494. Next Document
Terms & Conditions   Privacy   Copyright © 2003 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.