Skip banner Home   Sources   How Do I?   Site Map   What's New   Help  
Search Terms: human cloning
  FOCUS™    
Edit Search
Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed   Previous Document Document 288 of 750. Next Document

Copyright 2001 P.G. Publishing Co.  
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Pennsylvania)

August 17, 2001 Friday SOONER EDITION

SECTION: EDITORIAL, Pg.A-18 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

LENGTH: 183 words

HEADLINE: LIMITING STEM-CELL RESEARCH MAY DIM A GREAT FUTURE

BODY:
Before we rush to support and accept the decision by the U.S. House of Representatives to outlaw all cloning and severely limit stem-cell research ("House Bans Human Cloning," Aug. 1), each of us should fully understand what future options are being closed out.

We should examine not just our system of ethical values, but also the ranking of importance of these values and their application.

Imagine a very real future in which you are a mother whose child is paralyzed from the waist down by a spinal cord injury. Fortunately, the nucleus from one of your child's skin or other cells may be introduced into one of your own unfertilized eggs from which the nucleus has been removed.

Cloning techniques and stem-cell research have already been developed that supply your child with new stem cells, which, because they are an exact genetic match of your child, can replace the injured nerves without danger of rejection. Your child is able to walk, play and breathe again unassisted. This is one possible future. We seem to be headed toward another.

BRIAN G. RAMSEY

Shadyside



LOAD-DATE: August 17, 2001




Previous Document Document 288 of 750. Next Document
Terms & Conditions   Privacy   Copyright © 2003 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.