Copyright 2002 The Washington Post
The
Washington Post
May 30, 2002, Thursday, Final Edition
SECTION: EDITORIAL; Pg. A25
LENGTH: 730 words
HEADLINE:
Personhood in a Petri Dish
BYLINE: Richard Cohen
BODY: Come with me into Cohen's Lab. We are
going to do some cloning. I have a client with Parkinson's disease, and so I
take a cell from his tongue, extract the DNA from it, insert it into a human
egg, zap the egg with electricity, add some chemicals (sorry, the exact formula
is secret), wait about a day, extract the cells my patient needs and inject them
into his brain so -- knock on wood -- he will have Parkinson's no more. It is at
this point, if certain lawmakers have their way, that the cops will burst in,
cuff me -- and throw me in jail for possibly 10 years.
How much of this
is science fiction? Well, not the very first part about extracting the cell from
the tongue and inserting the DNA into an egg. And not, would you believe, the
last part, either. If a bill sponsored by Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) passes,
human cloning of any kind -- even just for medical purposes --
will become illegal. This bill has already passed the House. You might have
noticed while in my lab that at no time was my human egg fertilized. So if you
believe that life begins at conception, you are not getting life with this
process. You might have noticed also that I did not let the process proceed for
more than a day or so. I did not implant the egg into a womb, nor did I grow it
until term in the lab. Even if I had done so, the bioethicist Arthur Caplan
tells me, I probably would not have gotten a child out of the process.
But what you should notice above all is that my goal -- my sole
intention -- is to alleviate human misery. I want to cure Parkinson's or
Alzheimer's. I want to replace defective cells with brand-new ones, and because
the donor and the recipient are one and the same, I don't have to worry about
the body's rejecting the new cells. I don't want to make so-called designer
babies, nor, for that matter, is there any chance at the moment I could. At the
moment, the sad fact is that I cannot even make the cells I want. Someday,
maybe, I can. Someday I -- which is to say "we" -- can have cures for diseases
that now make life so miserable for so many.
The Brownback bill is
supported by President Bush. No surprise there. In general, if you scratch an
anti-cloner you will find someone opposed to abortion. (Although some pretty
implacable abortion foes such as Sen. Orrin Hatch and former president Gerald
Ford oppose the cloning ban.) And, for the most part, if you scratch someone in
favor of experimental cloning (almost no one supports it for human reproduction)
you will find someone supportive of abortion rights. So this debate really is an
extension of our cultural division. It is, at bottom, about sex -- how to
control it, how to punish it.
Brownback and his supporters are entitled
to their beliefs. But they are primarily religious ones -- a determination that
life begins when they believe it does. They feel so strongly about this that, in
the Republican-controlled House, they rejected a substitute bill that would have
permitted cloning for medical purposes only. Why? Because ultimately, they want
to declare the fetus or the electrically zapped egg a person, protected by the
Constitution. To destroy it is murder. Goodbye abortion.
But this bill
is nothing less than an attempt to impose a religious doctrine on the rest of
us. It is not that far removed from the Vatican's attempt to silence Galileo
because he supported the Copernican theory that the earth revolved around the
sun. It is an attempt by legislative fiat to stop science in its tracks: Thou
Shalt Remain Ignorant.
But even the Vatican couldn't keep the earth from
revolving around the sun. And not even Congress can stop medical research
elsewhere in the world. If therapeutic cloning can be done, it will be done --
and the desperate (not to mention the affluent) will get on airplanes for their
treatment. The rest will suffer or die -- all in the name of personhood for a
bunch of cells in a petri dish.
I distantly fear, in some late-night
movie sort of way, mad scientists giggling in the lab, whipping up batches of
Saddam Husseins. But in medical research -- medical research above all -- it is
inconceivable that the government would use its police powers not to impose
standards but to enforce ignorance and, as a consequence, human suffering. I
don't think a cloned cell is a person. But I am sure a Parkinson's sufferer is.
LOAD-DATE: May 30, 2002