Back to National Journal
38 of 41 results     Previous Story | Next Story | Back to Results List

04-14-2001

HEALTH: An Early Test of White House Views

President George Bush's views on cloning and embryo research may be
indicated by his stance on a new medical-research directive issued quietly
in the final days of the Clinton Administration. The new rule-45 CFR Part
46; Protection of Human Research Subjects-has already drawn fire from
anti-abortion Republicans, including Rep. Joseph R. Pitts, R-Pa. The Bush
Administration is now reviewing it.

The Health and Human Services Department's rule, published on Jan. 17, was designed to encourage greater participation by pregnant women in medical studies funded by the federal government. The rule allows a pregnant woman to volunteer for a study without the father's consent. Advocates say this would increase the pool of women available for medical testing of commonplace drugs that pregnant women might use. Many pregnant women are now disqualified from studies because they have had sexually transmitted diseases, are drug-addicted, or do not know the father's identity or whereabouts and therefore cannot get his permission. Anti-abortion lawmakers, however, are suspicious of this regulation because it seems to be giving too much choice to the woman alone about what happens to her fetus.

On the other hand, another part of the new rule would tighten regulations for medical research performed on newborns, aborted fetuses, or fetuses that although delivered, are not "viable," as determined by a doctor. While allowing waivers, the rule says that "viable fetuses ... after delivery" cannot be used for research purposes unless the experiment has the potential to benefit that individual child, and both parents consent-unless one parent is incommunicado. In all experiments on "nonviable fetuses ... after delivery" or on "fetuses of uncertain viability," researchers must not artificially extend the life of the fetus after delivery, nor can researchers have had a role in paying for the abortion.

The measure has elicited some concern from abortion-rights advocates, including Jaydee Hansen, assistant general secretary of the United Methodist General Board of Church and Society. His concern is that the new regulation may put more of the research burden on poor pregnant women. On the anti-abortion side, Richard Doerflinger, who heads the secretariat for pro-life activities at the National Conference of Catholic Bishops, says the new rules omit earlier protections adopted by Congress, including a 1995 law requiring that fetuses about to be aborted receive the same protections from researchers as those given to a legal child.

National Journal
Need A Reprint Of This Article?
National Journal Group offers both print and electronic reprint services, as well as permissions for academic use, photocopying and republication. Click here to order, or call us at 202-266-7230.

38 of 41 results     Previous Story | Next Story | Back to Results List