CGS big logo Overview linkTechnologies linkPolicies linkAnalysis linkPerspectives link

 

 


Home >> Technologies >> Other Human Genetic and Reproductive Technologies >> Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) and Screening
 
home
newsletter
resources
site map
about us

 

 

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) tests early-stage embryos produced through in vitro fertilization (IVF) for the presence of a variety of conditions. One cell is extracted from the embryo in its eight-cell stage and analyzed. Embryos free of conditions that would cause serious disease can be implanted in a woman's uterus and allowed to develop into a child.

screening of zygotes

PGD allows couples at risk of passing on a serious genetic disease to have a child that is fully genetically related to them and that does not carry genes for the disease. It does not involve the manipulation of genes in embryos; rather, it selects among embryos.

To date, PGD has been most widely used to prevent the birth of children with chromosomal diseases such as Down's Syndrome, and with other genetic disorders, including Tay-Sachs disease, cystic fibrosis, sickle cell disease, Huntington's Chorea, and Cooley's anemia.

People who oppose the destruction of human embryos in general are necessarily opposed to PGD; however, for some, PGD is preferable to aborting a fetus affected by a medical condition that has been identified through prenatal screening.

Preimplantation diagnosis and selection is also controversial because it can be considered a eugenic technology. Many disability rights organizations, in particular, have been critical of its uncontrolled use, and point out that the definition of "disease" is to some extent subjective. Most disability rights advocates who criticize PGD and prenatal screening nonetheless support abortion rights. They believe that a woman should be allowed to decide whether or not to have a child at a given time, but not to base this decision on the traits of the particular embryo.

Many people fear that PGD will be used to select a child of a preferred sex. PGD could also be used in attempts to select a future child's cosmetic, behavioral, and other non-disease traits.

However, the genetic laws of independent assortment make it difficult for PGD to be used for any traits that depend on two or more genes. Thus, PGD provides an alternative to germline modification as a way to prevent the births of children with serious genetic diseases, most of which are single-gene disorders, but does not open the door to escalating and species-altering applications.

(Image courtesy of the Association of Reproductive Health Professionals)

Arguments, Pro and Con

Frequently Asked Questions


Related Articles

Resources >> CGS >> Sign-on letter to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine regarding sex selection

Resources >> CGS >> Letter to HFEA on Sex Selection

Resources >> CGS >> Q&A: Preimplantation Diagnosis and Sex Selection

"Update on the Push for Sex Selection," Genetic Crossroads #27 (December 17, 2002)
Newsletter >> Archive >> Issue #27

"Human Cloning Advocate Pushes Fertility Clinics to OK Sex Selection," Genetic Crossroads (#20, October 3, 2001)
Newsletter >> Archive >> Issue #20

Amy Dockser Marcus, "Ensuring Your Baby Will Be Healthy" The Wall Street Journal (July 27, 2002)
Resources >> Items >> "Ensuring Your Baby Will Be Healthy"

Aaron Zitner, "A Boy or Girl, You Pick, " The Los Angeles Times (July 23, 2002)
Resources >> Items >> "A Boy or Girl, You Pick"

Gina Kolata, "Fertility Society Opposes Choosing Embryos Just for Sex Selection," The New York Times (February 16, 2002)
Resources >> Items >> "Fertility Society Opposes Choosing Embryos Just for Sex Selection"

Gina Kolata, "Fertility Ethics Authority Approves Sex Selection," The New York Times (September 28, 2001)
Resources >> Items >> "Fertility Ethics Authority Approves Sex Selection"

Susan Sachs, "Clinics' Pitch to Indian Émigrés: It's a Boy," The New York Times (August 15, 2001 )
Resources >> Items >> "Clinics' Pitch to Indian Émigrés: It's a Boy"


Off-Site Links

Erik Parens and Adrienne Asch, in consultation with the working group on Prenatal Testing for Genetic Disability. The Disability Rights Critique of Prenatal Genetic Testing: Reflections and Recommendations, The Hastings Center Report, September-October 1999.
http://www.thehastingscenter.org/oldsite/pdf/supseptoct_99.pdf

American Society for Reproductive Medicine fact sheet on PGD
http://www.asrm.org/Patients/FactSheets/PGD-Fact.pdf

The Committee on Women, Population, and the Environment (CWPE) is a multi-racial alliance of feminist activists, health practitioners and scholars. They have been actively involved in the critique of the use of PGD for sex selection. The committee has also maintained a commitment to critical engagement with other genetic and reproductive technologies.
http://www.cwpe.org/


More Information

Analysis: Examine the social, cultural, and economic landscape

Perspectives: Explore various communities' concerns regarding human genetic technologies

Policies: Read about existing and potential regulations

Date modified: