The Christopher Reeve
Paralysis Foundation supports the responsible use of nucleus
transplantation for research purposes and in particular to
establish new stem cell lines, given the anticipated
scientific and medical benefits. However, the Foundation
adamantly opposes the use of nucleus transplantation for human
reproductive purposes. The Foundation recognizes the
convergent scientific, medical, moral, and legal issues and
urges meaningful dialogue at the highest levels and an
oversight framework within which such research can be pursued
safely and effectively.
In its June 13, 2001
report, "Stem Cells: Scientific Progress and Future Research
Directions," the National Institutes of Health notes that
immune rejection is a profound challenge in human embryonic
stem cell transplantation. The report concludes that nucleus
transplantation offers a viable way around this challenge
because it can produce stem cells with genetic material
identical to that of the patient. Simply put, cells derived
from one's own tissues are less likely to be rejected. A
report issued by the National Academies in September 2001
reached the same conclusion, and urged research on techniques
to manipulate the genetic makeup of stem cells, including
nucleus transplantation.
Nucleus
transplantation is the transfer of DNA from the nucleus of a
"somatic cell" (skin, heart, nerve or anything or any other
non-egg or sperm cell) into an egg that has had its nucleus
removed. "Cloning," means to copy, whether one is copying a
molecule, a cell or a collection of cells that make up a human
blastocyst.
Nucleus
transplantation for the purpose of producing molecules or cell
lines provides us with unique opportunities to develop
effective treatments for a wide variety of currently incurable
diseases and disorders. It is also a powerful tool of modern
forensic science, vaccine development and drug discovery and
testing.