Remarks by Congressman Mark Kirk
Lexington
Institute
Capitol Hill Electronic Warfare Forum
October 5,
2001
With the
War on Terror, we are going to see how important Electronic Warfare (EW) is in
making sure that our American military wins.
After so
many conflicts and so many victories, I am beginning to wonder why other
countries have not figured out the "EW factor" in making sure that they, like
us, have such an unbelievable ability to protect uniformed men and women who are
flying over the beach and into harm’s way. As the squadron Air Intelligence
Officer for VAQ-209 and as someone who has flown in EA-6B Prowlers, let me just
mention a couple of things that I wish we would have next time we go into
battle. As a new Member of the
House Armed Services Committee, I am getting my "sea legs in Congress" and
beginning to push for more EW upgrades.
I think
probably the most critical thing that we really were missing while flying
against Serbia and Iraq was the ability to update aircrews inbound to their
targets on the changing threat.
The mission
from Aviano Air Base in Italy to Kosovo or from Incirlik Air Base in Turkey into
Iraq took two hours or more. The
situation could change fairly radically given the presence of mobile
Surface-to-Air Missiles (SAMs). In
the Iraqi situation, Saddam's SAMs did not move around much but in Kosovo enemy
SAMs moved constantly. My favorite
opponent was the Serbian SA-6 operator located outside of Ponikve, Serbia. I
called him "Slavko the Destroyer" as he was extremely mobile. He was moving
about every two days and that was making our tactical situation very difficult.
On one
mission, Woody (our best pilot) had been told that the Ponikve SA-6 was far to
his east. It wasn’t. Woody flew
right through the middle of the SA-6 threat ring and ate two four packs of SA-6
missiles. He dodged eight SA-6 missiles in just one engagement. It was a fine piece of flying but I wish
I had been able to alert him on Slavko's updated location -- preventing the
whole engagement. I learned of the
change as Woody was inbound to his target.
Slavo had broadcast a short burst at a new location to calibrate his
equipment. Our theater sensors delivered the new location to me through our MAT
antenna back at the squadron. It
showed Slavko's new position but there was no way to tell Woody once his mission
began. I could not give him the
updated threat picture. I hope that
we can update the Prowler to give threat updates to the crew who are already
inbound to their targets. This
would make us more effective and would help save lives.
I must say
the national EW sensor systems missed a lot, especially outside of Pristina.
There was one battery that the national systems never saw. As you know, the
Prowler’s ability to collect intelligence is limited. But we were the only ones who were able
to sniff out that SAM battery. It
was dangerous right up until an allied AGM-130 television-guided bomb went
through the door of the radar van.
I would hope that as we upgrade the national collection systems and make
sure updates go into the cockpit that we also make sure that things the aircrew
sees will feed back into the theater threat picture. This is a priority and when we do this,
we will have a much higher chance to locate newer low-wattage threat emissions.
On
situational awareness in the cockpit, I flew one EC-130 "Compass Call" mission
and drooled all over their display panels and their ability to dynamically
respond to what was happening. For
those not familiar with the Prowler cockpit, it is the old, late 1970’s flat
monochrome green screen as opposed to the festival of colors that you see on
Compass Call. Compass Call's threat display and sensors give the operator the
ability to dynamically respond to the threat and I know that the Prowler
ICAP-III program will help provide that to tactical aircrews in the future. This, too, is a priority especially if
you are going up against more capable systems like the SA-10 SAM. SA-20s now in production in Russia are
even more capable.
The last
big need is to upgrade the High-speed Anti-Radiation Missile (HARM). The HARM turned out to be a weapon that
was designed especially for the Serbs and somewhat for the Iraqis. The moment HARM was fired, the enemy
"respected it" -- they turned off their radars and gave us a good "soft
kill." We all like "hard kills"
i.e. colorful explosions destroying the target but a "soft kill" i.e., rendering
the enemy ineffective just as you approach him is almost as good. We obviously
we would like the enemy air defense batteries to "eat" a HARM missile but the
whole point of our mission was to get the enemy to turn off their radars as the
strike package aircrews approached the threat envelope. We certainly got that.
Nevertheless, one of the things that you like to have after a mission
-- the "Aviano Electronic Attack Wing" flew 770 missions - is the ability to
tell commanders how many threat radars we killed. Our answer was always, “Don’t know,
probably none.” Each mission
resulted in a soft kill. Upgrading
HARM to zero in on a radar even after it is turned off may give us both soft and
hard kills next time.
For those
looking at the current campaign, I have seen the SAM threat picture for
Afghanistan. It is not very
daunting and we may let our guard down on EW because of that. Only lower-grade SAM systems are there.
But when you look at the SA-10s and SA-20s in countries the War on Terror may
take us to, aircrews face a fearsome threat. We must maintain the ability to master
new enemy air defense systems.
We learned
on September 11th that the intelligence picture we saw -- of a dangerous world
-- was accurate. Unfortunately, we
ignored it. If we are to continue
the War on Terror, allied aircrews will face very robust, advanced
surface-to-air missile systems.
U.S. and allied forces need to be able to handle them. One of my deputies in Kosovo was killed
in the Pentagon. My other
deputy luckily was not. One of the
things we were planning before the hit on the Pentagon was a brief on these new
advanced SAM systems. I think
Members of Congress need to see the capability of these new threats to allied
aircrews and especially their real ability to burn through our current
jamming.
I am very
worried about these new systems. I
know that the Kosovo campaign would have shifted radically had advanced SA-10
SAMs ever shown up in theater. As the squadron's Intelligence Officer, I was
asked one question each morning: where are the SA-10s and have the Russians
delivered them to Serbia or not?
That would have radically changed the situation. For the future, we have got to plan on
facing such fearsome SAM batteries in the next conflict.
Over the
long term, we have to replace the Prowler.
An Analysis of Alternatives is underway at the Pentagon. I have a pretty model of a F-18G
“Growler” on the desk. I am not
pre-judging anything but a successor is needed. The only thing I will pre-judge is that
we have got to upgrade. Just
because other militaries are not investing in EW does not mean that we should
not continue to advance. Among
American aircrews from Aviano to Incirlik, tactical EW support aircraft are
critical “go/no-go” items. In
short -- no Prowler, no
mission.
In
Operation Allied Force, the assumption was aerial tanking aircraft availability
was the key factor limiting allied sorties against Serbia. It turned out not to be. It was
available tactical EW aircraft.
After we lost an initial aircraft in Allied Force, we got a memo which my
squadron framed. On it, LT General
Short -- the aerial commander of Allied Force -- basically said “Thou shalt not
enter my theater of war without thy Prowler attached.” That was a key sign of how valuable
these assets are.
As we look
to the future, information upgrades in the cockpit, better situational
awareness, and better HARM missiles are the priorities. We will need a whole new advanced
generation of EW assets because the United States is clearly ahead and we need
to stay there. EW is one of the key
reasons why we do not lose people or planes. When you talk to British aircrews,
they will tell you they are so happy that American Prowlers were there. They know that American EW aircraft make
the difference between getting hit and not, between losing brave pilots or
bringing them home.
Welcome ·
About Joe
Pitts ·
The 16th
District ·
Key
Initiatives ·
Legislation
·
Constituent
Services
Press &
Speeches · The Federal
Government ·
Links
·
Contact
Information ·
Home