|
Highlights |
Title II Conservation
|
The legislation emphasizes conservation
on working land by increasing funding for the
Environmental Quality Incentives Program and
establishing a new Conservation Security Program, which
pays producers to adopt or maintain practices that
address resources of concern. Land retirement programs
are expanded, placing particular emphasis on wetlands.
Funding is expanded for farmland protection. A new
Grassland Reserve is created to assist landowners in
restoring and conserving grassland. A new provision aims
at ensuring regional equity in conservation
funding. |
Key provisions
|
Provisions |
1996-2001 farm legislation |
2002 Farm Bill |
Conservation compliance
for soil erosion and wetlands. |
Highly erodible land
conservation (conservation
compliance/ sodbuster) |
Highly erodible land
conservation provisions denied certain farm program
benefits to producers not using an approved conservation
system on highly
erodible land in crop production. |
Highly erodible land
conservation provisions are continued. The Secretary
cannot delegate authority to make a compliance
determination to a private person or entity. |
Wetland conservation
(swampbuster) |
Wetland conservation
provisions denied certain farm program benefits to
producers who drained wetland to make it ready for crop
production. |
Wetland conservation
provisions are continued. The Secretary cannot delegate
authority to make a compliance determination to a
private person or entity. |
Top
of page
Provisions |
1996-2001 farm legislation |
2002 Farm Bill |
Land retirement, including CRP, CREP, the
Wetland Pilot Program, and WRP.
|
Comprehensive Conservation
Enhancement Program (CCEP) enables the Secretary to
operate the various conservation programs in a
consistent manner. |
Environmental Conservation
Acreage Reserve Program (ECARP) included the
Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), Wetlands Reserve
Program (WRP), and the Environmental Quality Incentives
Program (EQIP). |
ECARP is renamed
Comprehensive Conservation Enhancement Program (CCEP).
Authority for Conservation Priority Areas is eliminated
here and in the Environmental Quality Improvement
Program (EQIP), but retained in the Conservation Reserve
Program (CRP). |
Conservation Reserve Program (CRP)
offers annual rental payments and cost-share
assistance to farmers to establish long-term
conserving covers (e.g., grass and trees) on eligible
land. Contracts are for a minimum of 10 years and a
maximum of 15 years. |
CRP area was
capped at 36.4 million acres. |
Maximum acreage is increased to 39.2 million
acres. |
Land was eligible for CRP enrollment if it was
cropped in 2 of past 5 years and met 1 or more of the
following criteria: Had an erodibility index (EI)
of 8 or higher; Was considered a cropped wetland;
Was associated with or surrounding noncropped
wetlands; Was devoted to a highly beneficial
environmental practice (e.g., filter strips); Was
subject to scour erosion; Was located in national
or State CRP conservation priority areas. Was
marginal pastureland in riparian areas.
Certain marginal pastureland that was enrolled in the
Water Bank Program is also eligible. |
Eligibility changes: Highly erodible land must
have been cropped in 4 of the 6 years prior to 2002.
Land under expiring contracts is automatically
eligible to be considered for re-enrollment.
Contracts expiring during 2002 can be extended by 1
year. Requires existing covers be retained, if
feasible, when expiring contracts are
re-enrolled.
Requires an equitable balance among
conservation purposes of soil erosion control, water
quality protection, and wildlife habitat. |
Haying and grazing could be permitted on CRP land
during drought emergencies. |
Allows managed haying and grazing (including the
harvest of biomass) and placement of wind turbines, if
consistent with the conservation of soil, water quality,
and wildlife habitat, with commensurate reduction in
payment.
Requires study on economic effects of CRP
enrollment. |
CRP Wetland Enrollment Pilot Program
allows enrollment of farmed
wetland acres in the CRP. |
Pilot program
was established in the 2001 Agricultural Appropriation
Act. Enrollment of wetland and associated buffers was
limited to a total of 500,000 acres in 6 States: Iowa,
Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South
Dakota. No more than 150,000 acres could be enrolled in
any single State.
Wetland acres are to be enrolled through a continuous
sign-up similar to that for other high-priority
conservation practices. Payments are to be commensurate
with those provided to landowners who enroll filter
strips in CRP. |
Continues
Wetland Enrollment Pilot Program, extending it to all
States and increasing the enrollment cap to 1 million
acres (part of overall CRP acreage cap). Enrollment is
limited to 100,000 acres in any 1 State, but could,
within 3 years, be increased to 150,000 acres following
a review of enrollment by the Secretary. |
Individual
contracts were limited to 5 wetland acres plus buffer
acreage, and no more than 40 acres per tract. |
Contracts can
include up to 10 acres of wetland, although not more
than 5 would be eligible for payment. Buffer acreage is
limited to 3 times the wetland acreage. |
CRP
continuous sign-up for high-priority practices
allows enrollment of land in riparian buffers, filter
strips, grass waterways, and other high-priority
practices without competition. Acres enrolled under
continuous sign-up count toward the overall CRP acreage
cap. |
CRP continuous
sign-up (land can be enrolled at any time, not just
during designated sign-up periods) was initiated
administratively in September 1996 under general CRP
program authority. Land suitable for a high-priority
practice could be enrolled without competition and
generally at a higher annual payment rate than land
enrolled in a general CRP sign-up. |
Authority for
program continues.
Producers may enroll entire fields as buffers through
the continuous sign-up when more than 50% of the field
is eligible (through continuous sign-up) and farming is
infeasible on the remainder of the field. Payments on
the remaining acreage are limited to general sign-up
rates. |
Conservation Reserve Enhancement
Program (CREP)
is a joint State-Federal program that targets specific
agriculture-related environmental problems that are
significant at the State or national level. Acres
enrolled under CREP count toward the overall CRP acreage
cap. |
CREP was
initiated administratively under general CRP program
authority. |
Authority for
program continues. |
Wetlands Reserve Program (WRP)
enables the Secretary to purchase long-term or
permanent easements and provide cost sharing to
producers who agree to restore wetland on agricultural
land. Restoring wetlands wildlife habitat is a priority.
|
WRP area was capped at 1.075 million acres.
|
Maximum acreage cap is increased to 2.275 million
acres. The Secretary is required, to the extent
practicable, to enroll 250,000 acres per calendar year.
|
Wetland could
be restored through permanent easements, long-term
easements (30 years or the maximum allowed by State
law), and restoration cost-share agreements without
easements. Requires one-third of acreage to be allocated
to permanent easements, long-term easements, and
restoration agreements. |
Wetlands are
to be restored through permanent easements, 30-year
easements, restoration cost-share agreements, or any
combination of these options. Removes requirement for
one-third of acreage in each type of
agreement. |
Top
of page
Provisions |
1996-2001 farm legislation |
2002 Farm Bill |
Working lands, including EQIP, CSP, and other
programs providing assistance on lands in
production.
|
Environmental
Quality Incentives Program (EQIP)
provides technical assistance, cost-share payments,
and incentive
payments to assist crop and livestock producers with
environmental and conservation improvements on the farm.
|
Funding authorized at $1.3
billion over 7 years. |
Mandates Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC)
funding of: $400 million in fiscal year (FY) 2002,
$700 million in FY 2003, $1.0 billion in FY
2004, $1.2 billion in each of FY 2005 and 2006,
and $1.3 billion in FY 2007.
|
Cost sharing limited to 75%
of practice cost. |
Continues 75% cost sharing,
but allows 90% cost-share rate if producer is a
limited-resource or beginning farmer or rancher. |
At least 50% of program
funding had to be used for environmental concerns
associated with livestock production. |
Funding for livestock
producers is targeted at 60% of annual program
funding. |
Large operators, as defined
by the Secretary, were ineligible for cost-sharing
assistance to construct animal waste management
facilities. |
Removes animal unit cap for cost-share
eligibility.
|
Evaluation of contract offers based on:
location in conservation priority area (CPA);
maximization of environmental benefits per dollar of
program expenditure. |
Evaluation of contract offers based on: use of
cost-effective conservation practices; use of
practices that address national priorities;
optimization of environmental benefits is a purpose of
the program.
CPAs are no longer used. Bidding down is eliminated,
i.e., for applications with comparable environmental
values, the Secretary cannot select one applicant over
another only because of lower cost. |
To participate in the
program, a farmer had to develop a conservation
plan stating intended practices and describing
environmental purposes. |
Retains requirement to prepare a conservation plan
stating intended practices and describing environmental
purposes. Confined livestock feeding operations must
prepare a comprehensive nutrient management
plan. |
Contracts were 5 to 10 years
in length. |
Contract length is 1 to 10
years. |
Producer payments limited to
$10,000 per year or $50,000 for any multi-year contract.
|
No annual payment limitation. The sum of all EQIP
payments to an individual or entity cannot exceed
$450,000 during FY 2002-07. |
EQIP Conservation
Innovation Grants |
No similar provisions. |
EQIP funds can be used to
provide grants to stimulate innovative approaches to
leveraging Federal investment in environmental
enhancement and protection. Grants are to be awarded on
a competitive basis, to government and nongovernment
organizations and persons for innovative projects
involving producers, such as market-based pollution
credit trading, adoption of best management practices,
and carbon sequestration. Federal share of project cost
is capped at 50%. |
EQIP ground and
surface water conservation |
No similar provisions. |
Provides CCC funding, in addition to what is
available for the regular EQIP program, for ground and
surface water conservation, including cost share for
more efficient irrigation systems. Annual funding set
at: $25 million for FY 2002, $45 million for
FY 2003, and $60 million for FY 2004-07.
An additional $50 million in CCC funding (to be made
available as soon as practical) is allocated to water
conservation activities in the Klamath Basin. |
Conservation Security
Program (CSP)
provides payments to producers for adopting or
maintaining a wide range of management, vegetative, and
land-based structural
practices that address 1 or more resources of
concern, such as soil, water, or wildlife habitat. |
No similar provisions. |
Provides for CCC funding.
All agricultural land (cropland and grazing land) is
eligible. Cropland must have been cropped in 4 of
the 6 years prior to 2002. Lands enrolled in the
CRP, WRP, and Grassland Reserve Program are not
eligible. Forestland that is an incidental part of
the agricultural operation may be included. Animal
waste storage or treatment facilities are not eligible.
Producers can participate at 1 of 3 tiers. Higher
tiers require greater conservation effort and
offer greater payments. The lowest cost practices
that meet conservation standards must be used.
Conservation effort: Tier I: Producer must
address at least 1 resource of concern on at least part
of the agricultural operation. Contracts are for 5
years. Tier I contract renewal requires broadening scope
of practices or portion of the agricultural operation
covered.
Tier II: Producer must address at least 1
resource of concern on the entire operation. Contracts
are for 5-10 years and can be renewed.
Tier III: Producer must fully address all
resources of concern on the entire operation. Contracts
are for 5-10 years and can be renewed.
Payments: Payment is a percentage of the
national average land rental for the specific land use,
or another appropriate rate that ensures regional
equity: 5% for tier I, 10% for tier II,
and 15% for tier III.
Producers can also
receive 75% cost sharing for adoption or maintenance of
conservation practices.
The Secretary can
provide enhanced payments for taking additional actions
in a way that ensures regional equity for:
implementing or maintaining practices that exceed
minimum required for tier; addressing local
conservation priorities in addition to resources of
concern; participating in an on-farm conservation,
research, demonstration, or pilot project;
participating in a watershed or regional resource
conservation plan that involves at least 75% of area
producers; or carrying out assessment and
evaluation activities relating to practices in
conservation security plan.
Payment limits: $20,000 annually for
tier I, 25% of that amount for the initial payment based
on a percentage of land rent; $35,000 annually for
tier II, 30% for initial payment; and $45,000
annually for tier III, 30% for initial payment.
|
Wildlife Habitat
Incentives Program (WHIP)
provides cost sharing for people who own or control land
and want to develop and improve wildlife habitat.
Contracts are generally 5-10 years in length. |
Cost sharing of $50 million
for FY 1996-2002 was funded through CRP. |
Mandates CCC funding of: $15 million in FY
2002, $30 million in FY 2003, $60 million in
FY 2004, and $85 million in each FY 2005-07.
Secretary may use up to 15% of funds in any year to
augment the program's regular cost-share payments on
lands enrolled for at least 15 years. |
Conservation of Private
Grazing Lands (CPGL)
authorizes technical and educational assistance for
conservation and enhancement of private grazing
lands. |
Authorized appropriations of $20-$60 million. No
funds were appropriated during FY 1996-2001.
|
Authorizes appropriations of $60 million for each of
FY 2002-07.
Expands program purposes to include encouragement of
sustainable grazing systems such as year-round,
rotational, or managed grazing. |
Agricultural Management
Assistance Program provides assistance to States
found to be underserved by USDA programs. |
Program was created by the
Agricultural Risk Protection Act of 2000. |
Provides an additional $10
million per year in CCC funding FY 2002-07. Producers in
15 designated States are eligible for financial
assistance for a range of conservation and risk
reduction purposes. |
Technical
assistance |
Producers could obtain technical
assistance from providers other than USDA's Natural
Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) for preparation of
conservation compliance plans. |
The Secretary is required to
1) provide technical assistance to eligible producers
either directly or, at the producer's option, through
payment to an approved third party; and 2) develop a
program for approving third-party providers. The
Secretary may also request services of non-Federal
entities or enter into cooperative agreements or
contracts with them to provide technical assistance.
|
Top
of page
Provisions |
1996-2001 farm legislation
|
2002 Farm Bill |
Farmland protection,
including FPP and the Grasslands Reserve
Program. |
Farmland Protection Program (FPP)
provides funds to State, tribal, or local
governments and to nonprofit organizations to help
purchase easements against development of productive
farmland. |
Allocated up
to $35 million from CCC to fund the purchase of
conservation easements on 170,000-340,000 acres.
Approximately $50 million was spent to protect about
107,000 acres. |
Mandates CCC funding of: $50 million in FY
2002, $100 million in FY 2003, $125 million
in FY 2004 and FY 2005, $100 million in FY 2006,
and $97 million in FY 2007. The acreage limit is
removed. |
Land with
prime, unique or other productive soil was eligible. |
Eligible land is expanded to include land with
historical and archaeological resources. Eligible land
now explicitly includes cropland, rangeland, grassland,
pastureland, and forestland that is part of an
agricultural operation.
Eligible entities are expanded to include nonprofit
organizations operated for conservation purposes.
Eligible entities can use charitable contributions
from the landowner of up to 25% of the fair market value
of the conservation easement. |
Grassland Reserve Program (GRP)
is established to assist owners, through long-term
contracts or easements, in restoring grassland and
conserving virgin grassland. |
No similar provisions. |
Provides CCC funding, for 2003-07, of up to $254
million.
Restored, improved, or natural grassland, rangeland,
and pasture, including prairie can be enrolledup to 2
million acres. Tracts must be at least 40 contiguous
acres. Waivers are available for smaller parcels in
cases of exceptional acreage that meets purposes of
program.
Eligible grassland can be enrolled under contracts of
10, 15, 20, or 30 years or under 30-year or permanent
easements (or the maximum allowed by State law). Not
more than 60 percent of funds can be used for 30-year
contracts or 30-year and permanent easements. Not more
than 40 percent are available for 10-, 15-, and 20-year
contracts.
For contracts, annual rental payments equal 75% of
grazing value. Permanent easements are to be purchased
at fair market value, less grazing value, while 30-year
easements are to be purchased at 30% of fair market
value, less grazing value. Cost sharing is up to 75% of
restoration costs on restored grassland, up to 90% on
virgin grassland. |
Top
of page
Provisions |
1996-2001 farm legislation |
2002 Farm Bill |
Watershed Protection,
including RC&D, watershed rehabilitation, and
similar programs. |
Small Watershed
Rehabilitation Program provides funding for
rehabilitation of water resource projects. |
Appropriations authorized in
2000 at $5 million for 2001, and up to $35 million for
2005. |
Provides CCC funding, to remain available until
expended, of: $45 million in FY 2003, $50
million in FY 2004, $55 million in FY 2005,
$60 million in FY 2006, and $65 million in FY 2007.
In addition, the following amounts, to remain
available until expended, are authorized to be
appropriated: $45 million in FY 2003, $55
million in FY 2004, $65 million in FY 2005,
$75 million in FY 2006, and $85 million in FY 2007.
|
Resource Conservation and
Development Program promotes the protection of
natural resources and the improvement of local
economies. |
The Resource Conservation and
Development (RC&D) Program was reauthorized. |
RC&D Program is
permanently authorized. |
Great Lakes Basin Program
for Erosion and Sediment Control |
No similar provisions. |
The Secretary may carry out a
program for soil and sediment control that provides
project demonstration grants, technical assistance, and
information/education programs to improve water quality
in the Great Lakes Basin. Authorizes appropriations of
$5 million annually for 2002-07. |
Grassroots Source Water
Protection Program |
No similar provisions. |
Establishes a national
Grassroots Source Water Protection Program to more
effectively use onsite technical assistance capacity of
State rural water associations that operate wellhead or
groundwater protection programs. Authorizes
appropriations of $5 million annually for FY
2002-07. |
Desert terminal
lakes |
No similar provisions. |
Requires the Secretary to
transfer $200 million in CCC funds to the Bureau of
Reclamation to provide water to at-risk natural desert
terminal lakes. The funds are not to be used to purchase
or lease water rights. |
Conservation Corridor Demonstration
Program |
No similar provisions. |
Requires establishment of a conservation corridor
demonstration program on the east side of the Chesapeake
Bay in Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia. The project is
to demonstrate local conservation and economic
cooperation using existing USDA conservation programs.
State and local partners must provide 50 percent of
funding. Appropriation of such sums as necessary is
authorized. |
Top
of page
Provisions |
1996-2001 farm legislation
|
2002 Farm Bill |
Miscellaneous |
Regional equity |
No similar provisions. |
Before April 1 of each year,
priority for conservation program funding (excluding
CRP, WRP, and CSP) shall be given to approved
applications in any States that have not received total
conservation funding of at least $12 million for the
fiscal year. |
Partnerships and cooperation |
No similar provisions. |
In carrying out any
conservation program, the Secretary may use program
resources to enter into stewardship agreements with
State and local agencies, tribes, and nongovernment
organizations. The Secretary may also designate special
projects, as recommended by the State Conservationist,
to enhance technical and financial assistance provided
to producers to address natural resource issues. |
Privacy of personal
information relating to natural resources conservation
programs |
No similar provisions. |
Information provided to the
Secretary for the purpose of providing technical or
financial assistance to a producer through a natural
resources conservation program cannot be considered
public information and cannot be disclosed to any person
or entity outside USDA, except to the Attorney General
for the purpose of enforcing natural resource
conservation programs. |
| |
|