Copyright 2001 eMediaMillWorks, Inc.
(f/k/a Federal
Document Clearing House, Inc.)
Federal Document Clearing House
Congressional Testimony
July 17, 2001, Tuesday
SECTION: CAPITOL HILL HEARING TESTIMONY
LENGTH: 573 words
COMMITTEE:
SENATE AGRICULTURE, NUTRITION AND FORESTRY
HEADLINE: 2002
FARM BILL
TESTIMONY-BY: ADAM H. PUTNAM R-FL, REPRESENTATIVE
BODY: July 17, 2001
Statement
Representative Adam H. Putnam R-FL
Before the House Agriculture
Committee Hearing to Review the
Farm Bill I wish to
thank the Committee for holding this important hearing to review federal
agricultural policies for American fruit and vegetable growers or "specialty
crop" producers for the upcoming
Farm Bill. As a significant
contributor to our nation's agricultural production and balance of trade, it is
extremely important that the issues affecting fruits and vegetables play a major
role in the development of the
Farm Bill. Non-program crops
including fruits, vegetables, and other horticultural crops represent 24% of
U.S. agriculture's commodity sales. I applaud provisions within the Committee's
draft to respond to agricultural needs of specialty crop producers. These
programs include retention of the Flex Acre prohibition, expansion of the Market
Access Program, increased conservation funding, and emergency pest and disease
exclusion.
It is important to understand that the fruit and vegetable
industry did not call for any direct market assistance payments, instead focused
heavily on expansion of related agricultural programs to assist their needs.
Chief among these was expansion of conservation programs to meet the unique and
growing needs of fruit and vegetable producers. The Committee's draft increased
the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) to $1.2 billion. In order to
assure adequate access to this critical conservation program, a specific portion
of EUIP funds should be set aside specialty crops producers. Furthermore the
program should be adjusted to meet the unique environmental challenges of
specialty crop by including pest and disease management as a conservation
criterion.
The Market Access Program (MAP) was increased by $90 million
to $180 million under the Committee's draft, in a large part, I understand to
respond to the needs of the specialty crop community. However, with roughly only
one third of the present program currently being awarded to specialty crop
producers, it is recommended that the entire $90 million in additional MAP
funding specifically be designated for specialty crops.
The Committee's
draft also addressed the critical need for USDA to have the ability to respond
to emergency outbreaks of pest and disease - and I want to underscore the
importance, and appreciation for, this provision. However, long-term
preventative measures such as funding of $50 million for a Pest Detection and
Surveillance Program to combat pests and disease before they take hold is also
imperative.
Finally, additional resources for agricultural research are
necessary to allow American producers to respond to agricultural challenges and
allow our farmers and ranchers to compete in a world market. Included among
these research priorities should be an emphasis on the development of mechanical
harvesting to allow our fruit and vegetable growers to compete in a world
market. Furthermore, Rural Development funds should be dedicated for the
construction of farm worker housing to meet the crucial need for housing
especially in the fruit and vegetable growing community.
I thank the
Chairman for his efforts to respond to the challenges facing all agricultural
producers including growers of specialty crops, and I look forward to working
with the Committee in the weeks to come to meet those goals.
LOAD-DATE: July 18, 2001