March 20, 2002 Print-Friendly Version
Walden Urges
Farm Bill Conferees to Retain $175 Million in Funding to Resolve
Klamath Basin Water Crisis
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S.
Congressman Greg Walden (R-OR) this morning delivered a letter to
members of the Farm Bill conference committee urging the retention
of $175 million provided in the Senate version of the bill for
resolving the water crisis in the Klamath Basin. The Farm Bill
conference committee is currently meeting to resolve differences
between the House and Senate versions of the bill.
A copy of
Walden’s letter is available upon request.
“Just because
the government made poor decisions doesn’t mean there are not
significant water quality and quantity problems that must be dealt
with in this Basin,” wrote Walden. “That’s why I strongly
support the $175 million in funding that is included in the Farm
Bill by the Senate. But
I want to make sure those funds are spent in a way that will do the
most good for fish, farmers and water fowl, and my amendment
addresses these vital needs.”
Farm Bill
negotiators, representing both House and Senate members of the
conference committee, agreed yesterday to spend $17.l billion on
conservation in the 10-year bill. This figure represents $4.2
billion less than the level set in the Senate for conservation.
“While I am
absolutely committed to providing as much funding as possible to
resolve the crisis in the Basin, because of a math error the Senate
version of the Farm Bill overspent their budget by over $6 billion,
making it very possible that many of the important conservation
programs in the bill, including the Klamath Basin provisions, will
end up receiving less money than the Senate levels,” said
Walden.
Congressman
Walden has introduced a proposal to provide more specificity to the
$175 million in funds targeted for the Klamath Basin than is
provided in the original language authored by Senator Ron
Wyden. Walden’s
amendment to the Farm Bill incorporates the findings of the
February, 2002 National Academy of Sciences Report on the Klamath
River Basin, as well as the 2002 Biological Assessment (BA) by the
Bureau of Reclamation, both of which specifically identify a number
of projects that would improve water quality and water quantity in
the Basin. Among these
are riparian restoration in the Winema and Fremont National Forests,
improved flows and habitat conditions on Klamath River tributaries,
the creation of a hatchery for the endangered sucker fish in Upper
Klamath Lake, a pilot oxygenation study, and mitigation for the loss
of family wells in the Klamath Basin community. These projects are not
identified in the Wyden proposal.
Walden’s
amendment directs specific projects designed to ensure the delivery
of irrigation water for agriculture, such as a provision to provide
for water banking as proposed in the 2002 BA to increase water
availability in drought years.
The Walden proposal
would also provide $20 million to the Resource Conservation
Districts (RCDs) in the Basin, which are led by locally elected
officials and provide services to develop water and soil
conservation programs.
“I refuse to
forget that this is the Farm Bill, and the purpose of what we do in
the Farm Bill is to make sure that we have a vibrant agricultural
economy in the Klamath Basin and throughout this country,” wrote
Walden. “If we take the
steps I’m proposing, we’ll improve fish habitat, we’ll improve water
quality and quantity, and we’ll improve the health of the national
wildlife refuges.”
Walden continued, “By doing all of these things, we will
improve significantly the chances that farmers and ranchers in the
Basin will get the water they need.”
To view a
side-by-side document highlighting differences between the Walden
and Wyden amendments to the 2002 Farm Bill, please click on the
following link: http://walden.house.gov/issues/klamath/onepagerpart2.pdf.
Congressman Walden represents the Second Congressional District
of Oregon, which includes the 20 counties of southern, central and
eastern Oregon. Rep. Walden is a member of the House Energy and Commerce
Committee and the the House Committee on
Resources.
back
|