Skip banner Home   Sources   How Do I?   Site Map   What's New   Help  
Search Terms: farm bill
  FOCUS™    
Edit Search
Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed   Previous Document Document 89 of 420. Next Document

Copyright 2001 The Omaha World-Herald Company  
Omaha World Herald (Nebraska)

December 13, 2001, Thursday SUNRISE EDITION

SECTION: NEWS; Pg. 10a;

LENGTH: 431 words

HEADLINE: Grain, sugar subsidies survive farm-bill fight

BYLINE: By Jake Thompson

SOURCE: WORLD-HERALD BUREAU

DATELINE: WASHINGTON

BODY:
Senate Democrats batted aside attempts to phase out subsidies for sugar and grain Wednesday in their struggle to update federal farm programs before Congress leaves town for the year.

"This farm bill needs to get done," Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, said during daylong Senate floor debate on amendments. Harkin, the chairman of the Senate Agriculture Committee, is shepherding a five-year farm bill in hopes of a final vote as soon as today.

On Wednesday, the Senate defeated a proposal by Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., that sought to double spending on food stamps while reducing crop and cotton subsidies.

Lugar said crop subsidies totaling billions of dollars encourage farmers to overproduce and keep the prices they receive for their grain and cotton at two-decade lows.

He also decried the fact that 8 percent of the nation's farmers receive 47 percent of government subsidies.

Harkin defended his bill as a careful balancing act aimed at helping farmers across the country.

Lugar said senators were being too parochial and had the attitude of "I can be a statesman somewhere else, but not when it comes to sugar or peanuts or tobacco or even corn."

The Senate killed Lugar's proposal 70-30. Harkin and Sens. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and Ben Nelson, D-Neb., voted against Lugar's plan. Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., voted in favor.

Hagel has expressed sympathy for Lugar's argument and has suggested the Senate could work early next year on a farm bill that might extend more help to family farmers.

Harkin also defeated a challenge by Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., seeking to wean growers of sugar beets and sugar cane from federal subsidies that Gregg said cost taxpayers $ 1.9 billion a year.

The measure would have affected about 500 western Nebraska farmers who grow sugar beets, according to Nelson's office. He and Hagel voted against Gregg's amendment, as did Harkin and Grassley. The sugar subsidy phase-out was defeated 71-29.

A debate over the main Republican alternative, providing lower subsidies and more crop insurance, was expected today.

Farm groups are pushing the Senate to finish work on its farm bill this week and to work for a compromise with the House, which passed a different farm bill in October.

They want Congress to send the legislation to President Bush before Christmas.

Even though the existing farm bill doesn't expire until October 2002, farm groups want to capture money set aside earlier this year in the budget. They fear losing the funds next year to the war on terrorism.



LOAD-DATE: December 13, 2001




Previous Document Document 89 of 420. Next Document
Terms & Conditions   Privacy   Copyright © 2003 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.