Copyright 2001 Times Publishing Company St.
Petersburg Times (Florida)
December 26, 2001, Wednesday, 0 South Pinellas
Edition
SECTION: EDITORIAL; EDITORIALS; Pg. 20A
LENGTH: 445 words
HEADLINE: Cutting pork in farm subsidies
BODY: Call it the little Web site that could.
A searchable list of farm subsidies compiled by the Environmental Working Group
has helped to shame some senators into killing a farm bill
that had enjoyed sacred-cow status.
The list provides
fresh examples of outrages for bill opponents, who argue that the subsidies
Congress supposedly earmarks for struggling farms more often pad the pockets of
the wealthiest growers - along with some city slickers who do little if any
crop-tending at all. Among the chief recipients are several Fortune 500
companies, such as International Paper, Chevron and Caterpillar. Also on the
federal dole are lobbyists for major farm groups, a former Miss America, former
Chase Manhattan Bank chairman David Rockefeller and former Washington Post
editor Benjamin C. Bradlee. Hardly your overall-wearing crowd.
Since the database went live in November, those beneficiaries who had
received their federal checks in secret, all the while crying poor, have cried
foul. "To see my subsidies on that site was just like me being seen totally
naked at a school reunion," one victim of the new openness lamented in an
online forum. "Something has to be done about that site, because it is very
embarrassing."
Congress' energy would be better
directed toward changing the policies that make the site's numbers so
shameful.
This year's farm bill was
bloated with subsidies and larded with Congress members' pet projects. It
represented nearly total abandonment of the idea that drove the last farm bill - weaning growers from subsidies. Indeed, EWG showed
that federal payments comprised the bulk of many farmers' income. Worse,
the rotten core of the bill survived challenges that at least would have divided
the money more equitably and reserved a share for growers who use their land for
conservation purposes. Still, despite opposition from the White House, the
subsidies sailed through the House and were headed for easy passage in the
Senate.
Then came www.EWG.org. The list of agricultural
welfare recipients gave senators new ammunition in the debate. Indiana Sen.
Richard Lugar, for example, found that 66 percent of his state's farm subsidies
went to just 10 percent of the eligible farmers there. Now, a vote on the
measure will have to wait until after the holiday recess.
During the break, members of Congress members should use the newly
accessible information to illustrate how skewed our agriculture priorities have
become. Then they should return with the resolve to shape a more sensible and
equitable plan. The EWG database is no Harvest of Shame, but it should help sow
the seeds of reform when Congress reconvenes.