Copyright 2002 The Washington Post
The
Washington Post
January 29, 2002, Tuesday, Final Edition
SECTION: EDITORIAL; Pg. A18
LENGTH: 303 words
HEADLINE:
The 2002
Farm Bill BODY:
George Will dubbed the
farm bill an "assault on
fiscal integrity" and criticized Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle for his
efforts to address the five-year recession in rural America [op-ed, Jan. 13].
But Mr. Will incorrectly stated that farm incomes are expected to hit
record levels this year. The U.S. Department of Agriculture recently projected
net farm income to decline by 20 percent in 2002 (about $ 9 billion) on top of
the 25 percent income drop that has occurred since 1996. Another report by the
U.S. Department of Labor projects farming and ranching to lose more jobs than
any other economic sector in America during the next 10 years (328,000).
Our rural communities are experiencing deterioration of infrastructure,
increased bankruptcies and declining populations. Beyond that, we are seeing
losses of rural businesses, rural school consolidations and a decline in health
care and transportation services. Sen. Daschle has been a champion of family
farmers and ranchers throughout his career. His efforts in the Senate to pass a
farm bill before the holiday recess last fall should be
commended, not condemned.
Mr. Will took a cheap shot at the title of the
new
farm bill, suggesting that the name changed after Sept. 11.
This is another incorrect assumption by Mr. Will. Farm security means food
security for our citizens and reflects the need to maintain the long-term
ability of the United States to produce the safest, most abundant food and fiber
of any nation in the world.
Mr. Will should listen to the advice of
former President Dwight D. Eisenhower, who said almost 50 years ago: "Farming
looks mighty easy when your plow is a pencil, and you're a thousand miles from
the cornfield."
LELAND SWENSON
President
National
Farmers Union
Aurora, Colo.
LOAD-DATE:
January 29, 2002