Copyright 2002 The Washington Post
The
Washington Post
February 03, 2002, Sunday, Final Edition
SECTION: A SECTION; Pg. A06
LENGTH: 483 words
HEADLINE:
N.D. Senator Aims to Tighten Farm Subsidy Program
BYLINE: John Lancaster, Washington Post Staff Writer
BODY: Spurred by tales of millionaire
farmers reaping big profits at taxpayer expense, Sen. Byron L. Dorgan (D-N.D.)
plans to introduce legislation this week that would sharply reduce the amount of
money farmers can receive from federal programs intended to preserve small and
medium-size family farms.
In an interview last week, Dorgan said the
measure would lower the annual limit on crop subsidies to individual farmers
from $ 460,000 to $ 275,000, tighten eligibility rules and curb some of the
legal dodges by which "corporate agrifactories" milk large sums from federal
farm programs.
Dorgan said he would propose the changes as an amendment
to the
farm bill, which would authorize farm programs for the
next decade at a cost of $ 172 billion and is scheduled for debate on the Senate
floor next week. The Senate began debating the measure in December but was
unable to reach agreement before the holiday recess. The House has passed a
version of the
farm bill that doesn't lower subsidy caps. "This
has become a transfer payment from ordinary taxpayers to some of the largest
producers in the country, who need it the least," Dorgan said of farm subsidy
programs. "I am not interested in putting together a
farm bill
that takes scarce resources to allow people to farm the entire county. What we
should do is use the money we have to provide the strongest safety net we can
for family farmers during tough times."
Dorgan's proposal has
considerable bipartisan support, but it has aroused fervent opposition from
groups representing major commodity producers as well as lawmakers from southern
states, where farms tend to be larger than those in the upper Midwest. Sen.
Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.), for example, has warned that lower payment limits
would bankrupt many Arkansas farmers, already suffering the effects of low
prices and rising production costs. Mary Kay Thatcher of the American Farm
Bureau Federation, the nation's largest farm organization, said many of the
largest farms involve extended families and could not stay in business without
federal support. "It's not just a farmer and his spouse," she said. "It's
several brothers and their kids. So that money is often supporting more than one
family."
Moreover, she added, "payment limits really bite the hardest
when commodity prices are lower," as they are now. "It's really hitting farmers
at their worst."
Some farm groups take a different view. The National
Farmers Union, which represents 300,000 family farmers, has declared its support
for Dorgan's amendment. "If you don't have a payment limit, you increase
consolidation within the industry, meaning the government is protecting the risk
regardless of size," said Tom Buis, the group's vice president for government
relations. "If someone wants to get big," he added, "they should do it because
of market signals," not because of subsidies.
LOAD-DATE: February 03, 2002