Search the Databases
About Farm Subsidies
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Senate Approach Would Speed Payments to South Carolina Farmers for Farmland Conservation
Fate of Funding Hangs on Key Farm Bill Negotiations
South Carolina’s considerable – and growing – farmland conservation needs on private lands have gone chronically underfunded for years. That could all change as a handful of Senators and Representatives decide whether or not to adopt the Senate’s $4.3 billion annual investment in farmland conservation programs during final farm bill negotiations this month.
Currently, there is over $22 million in unfunded applications from South Carolina farmers who want to implement conservation practices on their land that would protect farmland and enhance drinking water sources and wildlife habitat.
These programs, which pay farmers to take steps to boost conservation, provide a range of benefits to rural communities while boosting family farm incomes – particularly among smaller struggling family farm operations.
New analysis by EWG shows that the Senate’s approach to boosting funding for farmland conservation programs would immediately get much needed assistance to more farmers in the state than the House bill. In comparison, by waiting until 2007 to ramp up farmland conservation programs, the House bill would fail to meet the growing demand for farmers who want to reduce their farm’s impact on local rivers and streams, enhance wildlife habitat and prevent sprawl from consuming more farmland. And, the longer farmers and communities have to wait to enroll in conservation programs, the more expensive it will be for taxpayers to address conservation problems.
In short, adopting the Senate’s conservation strategy will help more farmers, provide benefits to society and save taxpayers money.
Meeting Environmental Challenges with Agriculture Conservation Programs in South Carolina
Cleaner Rivers and Lakes: In South Carolina, 74.6 percent of surveyed rivers and streams and 8.9 percent of surveyed lakes have been classified as impaired. Agriculture is one of the leading causes of non-point source pollution in South Carolina.
Efforts to increase funding for the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) in the next farm bill would help more South Carolina farmers adopt practices to reduce the level of sedimentation, nitrogen and phosphorus runoff into South Carolina waters. The current backlog of EQIP funding in South Carolina is $14 million. Increased funding for the Conservation Reserve Program, especially for grass and tree buffers near to water bodies, in the next farm bill would also help reduce agricultural pollutants in many South Carolina watersheds. Although soil loss is declining, South Carolina still loses approximately 7.7 million tons of soil per year from cropland. Through the CRP, farmers can retire highly erodible land without incurring economic costs.
Safer Drinking Water: In South Carolina, 4 drinking water systems exceeded EPA's nitrate threshold from 1995 through 2000. Pesticides in water are also a concern, leading the state to install water-monitoring systems in potentially problematic areas. Pesticide use in South Carolina is 12 million pounds per year and nitrate use is 81,000 tons per year. Through USDA technical assistance and EQIP, South Carolina farmers could implement practices to reduce the use of these chemicals and prevent them from contaminating South Carolina's water bodies and source drinking water areas.
Protected Open Space and Working Landscapes: Like many states, South Carolina is quickly losing its best farmland to sprawling development. Every year South Carolina loses an average of 31,000 acres of prime farmland per year to development and suburban sprawl (USDA/NRI). Converting prime farmland to housing developments and parking lots means that it is lost for meeting future food needs as well as for open space. Presently, there is a backlog of farmers wanting to enroll 177 acres into the Farmland Protection Program -- a program that should be adequately funded in the next farm bill to help protect our natural resource base and our open space for future generations.
Enhanced Wildlife Habitat: South Carolina farmland is home to many species of game and non-game wildlife, including deer, turkey, red wolf, bear, fox, squirrel and the endangered Carolina Heelsplitter and shortnose sturgeon. Although South Carolina farmers have enrolled over 218,000 acres in the Conservation Reserve and Wetlands Reserve Programs, lack of funding has created a backlog of farmers who want to enroll additional land in the programs. South Carolina farmers volunteered to enroll 7,000 acres in the WRP last year in permanent protection and another 750 acres under 30 year easements. At least $7.8 million is needed to eliminate this backlog. Many more farmers are volunteering for the Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program to enhance wildlife habitat on their working farmland. Currently, 109 applications from farmers and ranchers totaling $357,000 are unfunded in South Carolina. Proposals to increase funding for these programs in the next farm bill would ensure that all farmers and ranchers who want to retire highly sensitive land for wildlife habitat or adopt new practices to create habitat can do so.
Healthier Food Supply: Many South Carolina producers are moving towards organic production. Since organic food is one of the fastest growing segments in the U.S. food industry, South Carolina could create a healthier food supply and farm economy by increasing organic production. Proposals to include organic transition payments in the next Farm Bill would help those South Carolina farmers who want to switch to organic farming.
Copyright 2003, Environmental Working
Group. All Rights Reserved.
Headquarters 1436 U St.
N.W., Suite 100 | Washington, DC 20009 || info@ewg.org
California Office
1904 Franklin St. Suite 703 | Oakland, CA 94612 || california@ewg.org