Search
About Us  |   Field Projects  |   How You Can Help  |   Publications  |   Government Affairs  |   Press   
Pets
Wildlife
Farm Animals
Marine Mammals
Animals in Research

HUMANElines
Action Alerts
Federal Legislation
Animals in Research
Companion Animals
Cruelty Issues
Farm Animals
Marine Mammals
Wildlife
State Legislation
International Policy
Citizen Lobbyist Center
Wayne Pacelle: The Animal Advocate


Gifts, Bequests and Memorial Donations
Donate Now/Become a Member
Experience Streaming Media
Marketplace
Contact Us
Site Map

Home Page >> Government Affairs >> Federal Legislation >> Cruelty Issues >> Ultimate Fight: Our Battle to Save Anti-Cockfighting Legislation
Ultimate Fight: Our Battle to Save Anti-Cockfighting Legislation


Cockfighting
Although it mainly deals with agricultural policy, the recently passed Farm Bill, a massive $190 billion piece of legislation, has major implications for animals. The U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate had independently passed versions of the bill that included provisions dealing with puppy mills, the bear parts trade, sick or injured livestock known as "downed animals," and animal fighting. But in the end, due largely to the veiled machinations of a conference committee, only one of these provisions survived—the legislation to crack down on cockfighting.

While it was a major disappointment that the other animal-protection provisions were gutted in conference committee—which substituted its judgment for that of the full House and Senate—the final adopted provision against cockfighting marks a huge advance in The HSUS's national campaign to end this barbaric practice. This new law should deal a massive blow to the underground, and surprisingly large and powerful, cockfighting industry. Combined with our efforts in states to ban cockfighting and strengthen existing laws, as well as our efforts to train law enforcement and assist them in cracking down on cockfighting, we are winning the fight against this despicable industry.

The History

In 1976, Congress enacted legislation to criminalize the interstate shipment of birds and dogs for fighting. But the cockfighting lobby—whose adherents legally operated in six states at the time—worked with its congressional allies to craft a major loophole that allowed the shipment of birds to states and countries where cockfighting was still legal. This provision allowed cockfighters to maintain their gamecocks in states where cockfighting was illegal, severely complicating the efforts of law enforcement to make busts.

In 1999, The HSUS began its legislative campaign to close the federal loophole on interstate shipments. The HSUS turned to Senator Wayne Allard (R-CO), then the Senate's only veterinarian, to sponsor the legislation. Just weeks after he introduced the bill, a gunfight over cockfight gambling debts erupted in Colorado, leaving three men dead. This tragic incident underlined a well-known fact among law enforcement officials: Cockfighting involves not just animal cruelty, but a range of other criminal behaviors, including human violence, illegal drugs and guns.

In the House, The HSUS approached a frequent adversary—Representative Collin C. Peterson (D-MN), best known to us as the co-chairman of the Congressional Sportsmen's Caucus—to introduce the companion bill. While The HSUS had tangled with Peterson on many issues, including mink industry subsidies and steel-jawed leghold traps, we had always detected an open-mindedness in him, and we thought he would make a particularly powerful champion of anti-cockfighting legislation. He agreed to sponsor the bill.

Cockfighters mounted a major campaign to thwart our efforts, hiring two former U.S. Senators—J. Bennett Johnston of Louisiana and Steve Symms of Idaho, who received hundreds of thousands of dollars in fees from cockfighting interests—as lobbyists to stymie the legislation. Coordinated with the grassroots efforts of cockfighters, the lobbying campaign slowed the progress of our legislation.

We stepped up our own grassroots lobbying campaign, urging supporters to contact their elected officials. We enlisted professional wrestling star Bill Goldberg to visit Capitol Hill to garner support for the legislation and draw media attention. We also secured endorsements from more than 100 law-enforcement organizations, including the statewide sheriffs' associations from Arkansas to Oregon.

In no time, we had dozens of cosponsors in both chambers. In fact, by early 2000, we had more than 60 cosponsors in the Senate alone, including the chairman of the Agriculture Committee, Richard Lugar (R-IN). But we had one major obstacle, and his name was Trent Lott (R-MS), the Senate Majority Leader. Lott had answered the call from Mississippi's cockfighting contingent, and refused to schedule a vote for the legislation. As a result, it died at the end of the 106th Congress in December 2000.

The Second Attempt

We vowed, however, to pass the legislation in the 107th Congress, which began work in January 2001. Allard and Peterson reintroduced the legislation in their respective chambers, and we were again off and running.

When Senator James Jeffords (I-VT) left the Republican Party and tipped the balance in the Senate toward the Democrats, it was a fortunate circumstance for our legislation. Lott was no longer in control of the Senate agenda, and the new majority leader, Senator Tom Daschle, was an early original cosponsor of the anti-cockfighting legislation.

Because Congress had to pass a Farm Bill, to replace the one set to expire in 2002, we viewed it as a potential vehicle for the anti-cockfighting legislation. Peterson did not like that idea, so we enlisted Representatives Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) and Tom Tancredo (R-CO) to attach amendments to ban the interstate shipment of birds for fighting, to ban exports of fighting animals, and to increase penalties for animal fighting. The amendments passed handily.

The Senate took up its Farm Bill next. The new Agriculture Committee Chairman, Tom Harkin (D-IA), had co-authored the anti-cockfighting bill, so we had a particularly well-positioned champion. He worked with Allard to incorporate the same anti-cockfighting language passed by the House into the Senate version of the Farm Bill.

The Conference Committee

When the House and Senate had passed identical animal-fighting provisions in their respective bills, our work should have been done. The rules governing conference committees stipulate that conferees are only supposed to deal with matters where the House and Senate are in disagreement.

But the House conferees were led by Agriculture Committee Chairman Larry Combest (R-TX) and ranking Democrat Charles Stenholm (TX), who fought hard against the animal-protection measures. On issue after issue, they bested Senate negotiators and gutted pro-animal provisions in the two bills. In the end, the committee retained the bans on interstate shipment of gamecocks and export of fighting animals, but reduced the penalty for animal fighting from a felony to a misdemeanor and stipulated that the measure not take effect for one year.

The Future

The fight is not over, though. We have worked with Reps. Robert Andrews (D-NJ) and Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD) to introduce a new bill, H.R. 5268, to restore felony penalties for animal fighting and prohibit interstate commerce in cockfighting knives and gaffs. We don't take "no" for an answer too readily.

At the same time, we continue our vigorous efforts to combat cockfighting at the state level. Shortly after passage of the Farm Bill, we scored a significant victory in Kansas with passage of a new law to prohibit cockfighting, attending a cockfight, training a gamecock, or allowing a cockfight to take place on one's premises. The law removes Kansas from a list of just six states with no statute specifically addressing cockfighting.

Iowa and Indiana have already strengthened their laws this year, and we are working hard on State Question 687 in Oklahoma, a ballot initiative appearing on the November ballot that would make that state the 48th to ban cockfighting and the 27th to adopt felony-level penalties. And we are supporting a ballot initiative in Arkansas, also appearing on the November ballot, that will make cockfighting a felony there, along with other malicious acts of animal cruelty. We will work to introduce a variety of bills in states in 2003 against cockfighting, and we will step up our efforts in Louisiana and New Mexico to ban the activity there.

We are grateful to Senators Allard and Harkin and to Representatives Blumenauer, Tancredo, and Peterson for their leadership in shepherding the legislation to enactment.

"Individuals who instigate fights between animals or who attend these pathetic spectacles should have no legal sanctuary anywhere in the United States," says Wayne Pacelle, HSUS's senior vice president and chief lobbyist. "We will be satisfied only when the last cockfighting pit is closed."

E-mail this Page Printer Friendly


OK S.B. 835 Cockfighting


Off Site
Oklahoma Coalition Against Cockfighting
An HSUS investigation on cockfighting

Bill Finder
Search for a Federal or State Bill.
Watch the Video
HSUS Undercover: Inside Animal Fighting
Related Information
Animal Fighting Prohibition Enforcement Act
Kansas Legislature Passes Bill Banning Cockfighting
[Privacy Statement] Copyright © 2003 The Humane Society of the United States. All rights reserved.