Search:  
   About   | Producers     | State Associations   | Public Policy     | Newsroom     | Resources    | Events     | Capital Update  
Home > News > News Releases >03-22-01   

March 22, 2001
Contact: Steven Cohen, 202-347-3600; cohens@nppc.org
For Immediate Release

PORK PRODUCERS SAY $10 BILLION IN FARM BILL NEEDED FOR CONSERVATION

Livestock producers will need at least $10 billion to help them comply with pending environmental rules to protect air and water resources, National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) President Barbara Determan told the House Agriculture Committee today.

Determan, a pork producer from Early, Iowa, testified before the Committee with representatives of other livestock groups regarding the future of farm programs. Determan told the Committee that while pork producers could support changes to the FAIR Act, "any changes in commodity programs that effect the price of feed would have a profound, adverse financial impact on our industry."

"Approximately 65 percent of the cost of raising a hog is feed, corn and soybeans being the major components," Determan said. "Overall, U.S. pork producers use 16 percent of the soybeans and 12 percent of the corn raised in America."

Determan said the next farm bill should be about much more than commodity programs and that conservation needed to take center stage.

Determan presented a detailed analysis indicating that livestock producers would need at least $10 billion in assistance in order to meet "costly environmental regulations as a result of state or federal law designed to protect water quality."

"We urge that the Committee support at least $10 billion over the life of a five-year farm bill in mandatory spending for USDA conservation programs to address livestock’s environmental needs, specifically for water and air quality," she said

Determan said that her analysis was based on a 75-25 cost share formula, something that is now used under the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP). She said that any new conservation program

must be available nationally and must be open without restriction to every producer, regardless of size or production system.

"One of the important reasons that EQIP has fallen short of it potential to improve the environment has been its prohibition against large livestock operations receiving waste management structural assistance," Determan said. "Instead of a size limitation, we feel it is much more appropriate and equitable if the livestock community is treated in the same manner as the row crop producers through the use of a payment limitation."

Determan also noted that in 2000, pork exports totaled 556,895 metric tons, worth $1.3 billion. Exports increased 12 percent by volume and 18 percent by value compared to 1999.

She said that NPPC’s trade priorities included the passage of trade promotion authority and increased funding for the Market Access Program (MAP). She added that pork producers believed that the U.S. position in the next trade round on agriculture should include the total elimination in the shortest possible time frame of all tariffs, all export subsidies and all trade-distorting domestic support for pork and pork products.

 

Home | About | Producers | Associations | Public Policy | Newsroom | Resources | Capital Update | Events | Join Email List | Site Map

Washington Public Policy Center | National Office  
122 C Street, N.W., Suite 875
Washington, D.C. 20001
p: 202.347.3600 | f: 202.347.5265
  7733 Douglas Avenue
Urbandale, IA 50322
p: 515.278.8012 | f: 515.278.8011
Copyright © 2003
National Pork Producers Council

Contact Us | Privacy Statement