December 6,
2002
Country of Origin Labeling
Food labels similar
to the "Made in the USA" tags for clothing are coming to grocery stores,
letting consumers know where the meat, fish, peanuts, fruits and
vegetables they buy are grown and processed, reports Associated
Press.
The farm and food
industries are divided over the country-of-origin program created under
the new farm bill that requires the labeling to begin in 2004.
Consumer and farm
groups believe it may give American farmers a competitive edge over
foreign products. But many retailers, processors and even producers say
complying with labeling rules will be costly and time-consuming. They
cite guidelines that will require a complex and expensive system of
tracking products - especially meat made from animals raised in one
country and processed in another. Agriculture Secretary Ann Veneman said
in the spring that the Bush administration did not want the labels. But
they made it into the farm legislation the president signed.
Figures released
last month by the Agriculture Department indicate the food industry may
spend more than $1.9 billion to complete the paperwork needed to comply
with the rules over the next two years before they become mandatory.
Consumer and farm
groups that support the labels are skeptical of the figure.
"I think that that's
a bunch of hooey," said Fred Stokes, president of the Organization for
Competitive Markets. The Nebraska-based farm group says the program
encourages healthy competition between U.S. producers and their trading
partners.
Stokes said
spreading the cost among consumers would add just a few more cents to
their weekly shopping bill.
Retailers, however,
believe the department's estimate is too low.
John Motley of the
Food Marketing Institute, a trade group of retailers and wholesalers,
said retailers, processors and packers will have to spend millions of
dollars more to segregate products from different countries.
They will have to
keep them separated when moving them from the farm, to the processors
and to stores - an expense that the government did not calculate, Motley
said.
The guidelines do
not allow an animal raised in Canada and slaughtered in the United
States to be simply labeled: "Product of the United States." In that
case, the label would have to read "Born in Canada, Processed in the
United States."
He said everyone in
the food chain, from farmer to consumer, would share in the expense. "I
guess if there's a theme here, I guess the theme is to spread the pain,"
Motley said.
While retailers are
united in their opposition, farm groups are not.
The National Pork
Producers Council fears hog farmers will end up spending too much money
on record keeping. But the National Farmers Union and the American Farm
Bureau Federation support the program.
"Producers feel
strongly that if a consumer goes to a store and sees a product from the
United States versus a product from New Zealand or Canada, that the
consumer's going to buy that U.S. product," said Caroline Rydell,
congressional relations director for the Farm Bureau.
For Canada, "it's
nothing but a nontariff trade barrier," said Bob Friesen, president of
the Canadian Federation of Agriculture, a farm group. "We think it's
going to prejudice the processing industry against buying Canadian
product because of compliance constraints."
Canada and the
United States have been trading hogs and cattle extensively to improve
breeding and meat products. Many U.S. hog producers fear the labeling
system will close the door on free trade with Canada, said Kara Flynn,
spokeswoman for the National Pork Producers Council.
On the other side,
the independent cattlemen's group R-CALF United Stockgrowers of America
says the labels will force U.S. trading partners to become more
competitive and should benefit consumers.
"We're concerned
that the opposition appears to be fearful of competition," said Bill
Bullard, the group's chief executive officer.