|
President Bush’s Budget Slashes Farm Conservation
Programs that Promote Clean Water and Prevent Sprawl
President Bush’s Budget Proposal for Fiscal Year 2002 would
eliminate some of the most important environmental programs in the
budget. These voluntary programs administered by the Natural
Resources Conservation Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture
help farmers protect sensitive wetlands, adopt
environmentally-responsible farming practices, and keep land in the
pathway of sprawl from being developed. The Bush budget calls for
zeroing out the Wetlands
Reserve Program, the Farmland
Protection Program, and the Wildlife
Habitat Incentives Program.
In failing to provide funds for these vital programs, the Bush
budget dismisses them as having “completed their mission.” Nothing
could be further from the truth with thousands of farmers and
ranchers lined up waiting to participate in these programs. Rather
than being eliminated, the Sierra Club believes that these programs
should be expanded to help even more farmers who want to do the
right thing for the environment.
Annual direct payments to farmers have skyrocketed from less than
$10 billion in the early 1990s to a record $32 billion in 2000. Over
this period, however, annual conservation spending has been held to
less than $2 billion, about 6 percent of farm program spending.
Farmers, ranchers, and private foresters can and want to take
practical steps to enhance water supplies, wildlife habitat, and
long-term soil productivity. However, according to USDA, roughly
three out of four who seek assistance for most conservation programs
are turned away because of lack of funds.
Specific programs slated for elimination under the Bush plan
include:
Wetlands Reserve Program (WRP)
The Wetlands Reserve Program was created in 1990 and has become
one of the most successful programs for protecting wetlands having
successfully preserved or restored nearly 1 million acres. The WRP
helps farmers take out of production farmland that is otherwise
unsuitable for agricultural use because it is highly prone to
flooding. The land is preserved or restored to provide critical
ecological functions such as storing floodwaters, filtering
sediments that cause pollution, and providing habitat for wildlife.
Removing such marginal lands from production also helps control
prices by providing disincentives for farmers to overproduce.
Today, there are over 3,000 farms and ranches waiting to enroll
another 570,000 acres of wetlands. Just enrolling 250,000 acres
annually would require $275 million per year. Much of this acreage
lies in the Upper Mississippi River Basin – Illinois, Indiana, Iowa,
Ohio, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. The farming practices in these
states are major sources of the fertilizer that winds-up down-river
and has caused a "dead zone" the size of New Jersey in the Gulf of
Mexico where marine life cannot survive. Scientists have found that
restoring lost wetlands – which intercept and filter nutrients from
fertilizer before farmland runoff reaches streams and creeks – is
among the most cost-effective strategies to reduce the size of the
dead zone.
The following table shows the tremendous need in the Midwest for
the WRP Program.
State |
WRP, EWRP, and EWP Acres Enrolled |
WRP and EWP Acres Backlogged |
Average Cost for Easement Paid to Farmer |
Amount that Could be Paid to Farmers for WRP |
Illinois |
36,586 |
20,833 |
$1,000 |
$20.3 million |
Iowa |
91,026 |
61,400 |
$1,500 |
$92.1 |
Minnesota |
25,869 |
25,134 |
$382 |
$9.6 |
Missouri |
79,606 |
32,014 |
$855 |
$27.4 |
North Dakota |
16,479 |
11,000 |
$445 |
$4.9 |
South Dakota |
68,986 |
10,000 |
$546 |
$5.5 |
Wisconsin |
24,377 |
10,000 |
$900 |
$9.0 |
Totals |
342,929 acres |
170,381 acres |
Avg. $1009 per acre* |
$168.8 million |
Source: State WRP Coordinators, Natural Resources
Conservation Service, USDA. *weighted average. EWRP =
Emergency Wetlands Restoration Program EWP = Emergency Watershed
Protection Program Note: Iowa leads in enrollments, followed by
Missouri, South Dakota, and Illinois. Iowa also leads in backlogs,
followed by Missouri, Minnesota, and Illinois. North Dakota is last
in enrollments due to the limits the state places on new enrollees.
State wetland coordinators said these numbers would be higher if
there were more acres available.
More information on the Wetlands
Reserve Program.
Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program (WHIP)
The WHIP Program is a voluntary program that provides
cost-sharing for landowners to apply an array of wildlife practices
to develop habitat that will support upland wildlife, wetland
wildlife, threatened and endangered species, fisheries, and other
species. A total of $50 million was authorized in the 1996 Farm Bill
and these funds were fully exhausted in 1999.
Experts at the Natural Resources Conservation Service estimate
that more than 10,000 farmers would annually seek federal assistance
to protect and restore wildlife habitat under the WHIP program if
funding were available. NRCS estimates that 7.6 million acres need
to be treated to enhance and maintain locally and regionally
significant wildlife habitat. Historically, 15 percent of program
funding has been used to develop wildlife habitat for federally
endangered and threatened species. At an average easement cost of
$1,692 per acre, over $1.3 billion is needed annually.
Farmland Protection Program
According to USDA approximately 2 million acres of farmland are
lost each year to development. The Farmland Protection Program
provides matching federal funds to purchase easements from farmers
to preserve farmland and prevent sprawl. At least $1 billion is
needed annually to protect just 10 percent of this threatened
land.
Between January and March of this year alone, the USDA received
requests for more than $116 million in matching funds from farmers
and ranchers willing to protect their land through the FPP. If fully
funded, this year's requests would have leveraged $186 million
dollars of state and local money and protected more than 770 farms.
Up
to Top
|