_ |
August 3,
2001
Raj Bharwani 569
Words
(202) 225-5101
House Energy Bill Provides Light at the End of the
Tunnel
After eight years without a coherent energy policy, the House voted on
August 1, 2001, for a comprehensive energy plan to increase conservation
and production while protecting the environment. H.R. 4, the
Securing America's Future Energy (SAFE) Act, is the legislative portion of
the President's comprehensive energy policy. It incorporates
legislation from five committees of jurisdiction, and includes provisions
on conservation, environmental regulations, alternative energy sources,
and increasing production. It passed - with my support - by a vote
of 240 to 189.
I voted for the SAFE Act because it is a comprehensive, balanced
approach to energy policy that incorporates efforts to bolster the use of
alternative and renewable forms of energy. It encourages
conservation, improves our energy infrastructure, and develops traditional
sources of energy within the United States. For too long, the U.S.
has lacked a coherent energy policy, making our economy increasingly
vulnerable to the whims of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting
Companies (OPEC). High gas and home heating prices in Wisconsin
earlier this year were evidence of that fact. Furthermore, last
year, foreign imports of oil made up 52% of the nation's supply - close to
twice the percentage of the 1970's. We must reduce this dependence
on foreign oil and gas in order to help the U.S. economy. We can't
be held hostage to countries like Iraq and Iran when it comes to a
resource that is essential for this country to operate. If we don't
pursue our options for oil exploration in the U.S., we could be crippled
by countries that would love to be in a position of control. H.R. 4
represents a solid first step to reduce this dependence.
H.R. 4 includes several provisions that offer help to Wisconsin’s
energy prices. For example, as a step in the right direction, it
addresses the problems associated with the use of the multitude of
“boutique” fuels, which are used across the country. As a result of
the numerous regulations placed on the sale of gasoline, there are a great
variety of blends of gasoline sold across the country. These
"boutique" fuels place a great strain on the production and distribution
of gasoline because these different blends of gasoline often cannot be
used in more than one region. Instead of having different counties
and states using different blends of gasoline, we must work toward lifting
these restrictions and allowing various regions around the country to use
more uniform gasoline blends.
H.R. 4 also calls for a re-evaluation of the regulations governing the
switch from winter-blend to summer-blend gasoline. The present
regulations have contributed to the steep gasoline price spikes seen in
the spring in Wisconsin for the past two years. Additionally, the
energy bill includes $33.5 billion in tax cuts and incentives over ten
years to encourage the harnessing of cleaner sources of energy like
solar, wind, energy created using landfill gas, and other
renewables.
H.R. 4, the SAFE Act, is a good bill for the nation, for Wisconsin, and
for the environment. Our current energy problems are the result of
numerous factors and demand a multi-faceted solution. There is no
simple one-size-fits-all solution to these problems, but this energy bill,
by taking a balanced and comprehensive approach, offers us all the
opportunity to consider a national energy strategy for the first
time.
###

|