Copyright 2002 The Houston Chronicle Publishing Company The Houston Chronicle
April 24, 2002, Wednesday 3 STAR EDITION
SECTION: BUSINESS; Pg. 1
LENGTH:
688 words
HEADLINE: Breakthrough in Senate to
bring energy bill vote
SOURCE: Staff
BYLINE: KAREN MASTERSON, Houston Chronicle
Washington Bureau
DATELINE: WASHINGTON
BODY: WASHINGTON - Senate leaders
Tuesday agreed to finish up a broad energy bill by week's end, adding $ 14
billion in tax breaks to boost everything from oil production to wind power and
more-efficient appliances.
After a six-week partisan
struggle, a breakthrough was achieved when Democrats caved in to the demands of
Sen. Phil Gramm. The Texas Republican had held the energy bill's tax provisions
hostage by threatening to tack on a permanent repeal of the estate tax.
But Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota
chose to avoid adding another hotly contested issue to what has already been a
complex and, at times, highly contentious debate over the nation's energy
strategy. Instead, he defused the problem by promising to debate the estate tax
no later than June 28.
The Senate voted 86-13 to limit
debate on the energy bill to just 30 more hours, with a vote on passage expected
either Thursday night or Friday. Both Gramm and Texas Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison,
a Republican, voted to end debate.
"It's time we bring
this to a conclusion," Senate Republican leader Trent Lott of Mississippi
said.
And Daschle said: "I am hopeful that we can
complete our work and then move on to conference."
For
the first time since the energy bill was introduced earlier this year, the
Senate appears to have the votes to pass it. If that happens, the bill will be
taken up by a House-Senate conference, where significant disagreements will need
to be worked out.
In August, the House passed a very
different energy plan that parallels President Bush's energy strategy. Unlike
the Senate bill, which focuses on energy conservation, the House measure
promotes oil, gas, coal and nuclear energy production.
And House GOP leaders, with help from labor unions, included a
provision allowing oil exploration in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge,
a cornerstone of the president's energy plan. The Senate, by contrast, killed
attempts by Republicans to add a similar provision to its version of the
bill.
Whether lawmakers will be able to work out their
differences remains unclear.
With Gramm's estate tax
repeal set aside, senators unanimously agreed to add a broad package of tax
incentives, split almost evenly between energy conservation and production.
Through the tax code, the bipartisan plan promotes the development and use of
energy from wind, solar and geothermal sources, as well as from plant and animal
waste.
The bill would provide tax breaks of up to $
2,000 a year for energy efficient homes and give up to $ 75 tax credit for
buying energy-efficient water heaters, $ 250 for electric and geothermal heat
pumps and air conditioners, and $ 500 for natural gas heat pumps. And business
owners would be allowed to write off money spent to make buildings more
energy-efficient, up to $ 2.25 per square foot.
On the
production side, the bill includes investment tax credits for clean coal
technology and for oil and gas production, including tax credits of up to $ 3
per barrel for oil produced from shale or tar sands. The Senate tax provisions
are less than half the $ 33 billion included in the House bill, which would
largely benefit oil, coal, natural gas and nuclear energy companies.
This week, the Senate could take up a variety of pending
issues, including attempts to strip provisions that would require more
clean-burning ethanol in gasoline.
Senators may also
revisit the debate over passenger vehicle fuel efficiency. Last month, senators
from big auto manufacturing states killed provisions that would have required
automakers to produce more fuel-efficient cars, SUVs, minivans and light
trucks.
Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Penn., and Thomas Carper,
D-Del., may revisit the issue by offering an amendment that would require
passenger vehicles to reduce oil consumption by 1 million barrels a day, or
about 10 percent, by 2015.
Alaska's Republicans on
Tuesday agreed to lay to rest, at least for now, debate over oil drilling in the
Alaska refuge.
They had vowed to continue pushing the
issue last week, after senators voted 54-46 in favor of preserving the
19-million-acre refuge.