Copyright 2002 eMediaMillWorks, Inc.
(f/k/a Federal
Document Clearing House, Inc.)
Federal Document Clearing House
Congressional Testimony
July 25, 2002 Thursday
SECTION: CAPITOL HILL HEARING TESTIMONY
LENGTH: 1663 words
COMMITTEE:
HOUSE TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
SUBCOMMITTEE: HIGHWAYS AND TRANSIT
HEADLINE: TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM AND COMMUNITIES'
QUALITY OF LIFE
TESTIMONY-BY: BRYNA HELFER, DIRECTOR
AFFILIATION: EASTER SEALS PROJECT ACTION
BODY: Statement of Ms. Bryna Helfer Director Easter
Seals Project ACTION
Committee on House Transportation and
Infrastructure Subcommittee on
Highways and Transit
July 25, 2002
Chairman Petri, Ranking Member Borski, and members
of the Committee. Thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today to
discuss the need for a community approach to meet the needs of riders with
disabilities. I am Bryna Helfer, Director of Easter Seals Project ACTION
(Accessible Community Transportation In Our Nation). Congress originally
commissioned Easter Seals Project ACTION in 1988 as a research and demonstration
project to improve access to public transportation for people with disabilities.
With the passage of the ADA two years later, our goals expanded to help
transportation operators implement the law's transportation provisions. The
project was reauthorized as part of TEA-21 and the authorized
funding level was raised from $
2 million to
$
3 million, which the project has received every fiscal year
since. The project is administered by Easter Seals through a cooperative
agreement with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transportation
Administration. Easter Seals Project ACTION promotes cooperation between the
transportation industry and the disability community to increase mobility for
people with disabilities through research, technical assistance, and outreach.
Congress created, FTA funds, and Easter Seals administers Project ACTION because
we all recognize the importance of transportation in creating a society where
people with disabilities have equal access to education, employment, and
community life. While our communities have made great strides in recent years in
creating accessible transportation options, there is still a long way to go.
According to a population-based survey conducted in 2000 by the Harris Poll and
funded by the National Organization on Disability, approximately 30 percent of
Americans with disabilities have a problem with inadequate transportation,
compared to approximately 10 percent of the general population. People with
disabilities are unemployed at close to seventy percent, and increased access to
transportation can help ameliorate that number. While over eighty percent of the
nation's bus fleet is equipped with lifts, environmental barriers to access
still remain including poorly maintained sidewalk, missing curb cuts, broken
elevators, and untrained or resistant transportation personnel. Paratransit
systems are also often unable to provide transportation in a timely and reliable
manner due to over burdened systems or other systemic problems. Easter Seals
Project ACTION believes that the way to address these remaining issues is to
approach solutions from a community perspective. Easter Seals Project ACTION
sponsored two national dialogues on accessible transportation on March 13 -14,
2002 and June 25, 2002. These meetings brought together national leaders from
the disability and transportation communities to discuss current barriers to
accessible transportation and develop solutions. Many distinguished national
leaders participated in the national dialogue including Secretary of
Transportation Norman Mineta and the late disability rights leader Justin Dart.
We also assisted in organizing a summit jointly sponsored by the Department of
Transportation and the Department of Labor on employment for people with
disabilities and transportation. The summit was held on June 26-27. Participants
in the summit developed a series of recommendations for the two departments to
implement. This very recent experience has helped shape some of the
recommendations and approaches that I will discuss today.
The number one
solution that was brought forward by participants in the national dialogue, the
DOT/DOL Summit and from participants in various Project ACTION trainings and
other activities is the need for greater coordination at the federal, state and
local level. Our experience shows that this is indeed the most effective
approach to meet the needs of people with disabilities. Our technical assistance
team has been working with over 20 communities to implement Mobility Planning
Services (MPS) over the past year. The Mobility Planning Services concept is a
comprehensive approach to accessible transportation. The underlying philosophy
of MPS is that improving mobility for persons with disabilities is the
responsibility of the entire community, and that accessibility will be reached
most effectively when all stakeholders work together. Communities implementing
MPS identify existing gaps and resources related to accessible transportation,
and then develop a comprehensive action plan to create change. The MPS concept
provides the disability community and the transportation industry an opportunity
to bridge the gap between affordable and reliable transportation. The MPS
program is designed to be a continuum of services to build accessible
transportation. The building blocks of MPS are: - Community Assessment of
Accessible Transportation
- Environmental Barrier Analysis and Options
for Remedy
- Paratransit Eligibility Processes
- Disability
Awareness and Sensitivity Training for Bus Operators
- Coalition
Building
- Customer Service Monitoring and Feedback for Fixed Route and
Paratransit Services
- General Consumer Education
-
Individualized Travel Instruction
- Inter-modal Trip Planning
This kind of collaborative approach is a proven, effective way to
address issues affecting access to transportation for people with disabilities.
This coordination is a crucial element, but we also have to make sure
that the unique supports that many people with disabilities need will still be
in place. Programs targeted specifically at meeting the needs of people with
disabilities such as the 5310 program and non-ADA paratransit services are often
under funded and coordination with other disability transportation systems and
the transportation system as a whole is difficult because of the lack of
flexibility that is built into those programs. We need to make sure that these
and other services are encouraged to coordinate their systems and are give the
resources and flexibility to be able to do so.
It is also important that
the various federal agencies that fund transportation systems and research work
together. There are currently programs administered by the Departments of
Transportation, Labor, Education, and Health and Human Services that have a
direct impact on accessible transportation. However, these agencies are often
unaware of the activities happening in their sister agencies. In much the way
that we encourage local communities to implement Mobility Planning Services, it
is important that federal agencies implement a similar process. Several
transportation related recommendations were developed in response to the
President's Executive Order last July that required federal agencies to address
barriers to community integration in federal policies and programs. These
recommendations were a good beginning. However, an ongoing interagency dialogue
on this crosscutting issue is still needed.
According to a 1994-95
survey by the National Center for Health Statistics, almost 5.5 million
Americans report that they never drive because of an "impairment or health
problem." As a result, people with disabilities are disproportionately reliant
on public transportation. Because of this reliance, it is important that federal
programs support an extensive, flexible and reliable public transportation
system for all Americans to meet the needs of people with disabilities.
Accessible, affordable public transportation is a necessary prerequisite for any
community that seeks to live up to the letter and spirit of the Americans with
Disabilities Act. This approach was supported by participants in the national
dialogue who identified integrating accessibility into all aspects of
transportation operations as a primary concern.
People with disabilities
who live in rural areas have an even more pressing need for access to public
transportation. People with disabilities in rural areas are often reliant on
friends, neighbors or sometimes expensive taxi services for any transportation
needs. In rural and suburban areas, people with disabilities are much more
likely to live outside of the 1/4 mile radius that the ADA mandates for ADA
complimentary paratransit service and, therefore, may have many fewer options
than their counterparts in urban areas. Easter Seals Project ACTION has funded
some research into possible approaches to meet the needs of rural residents with
disabilities. The members of the Association of Programs for Rural Independent
Living have also identified access to transportation as one of their primary
concerns, and the U.S. Department of Education has funded that organization to
investigate a rural employment transportation voucher model. The Administration
on Developmental Disabilities has also funded a transportation demonstration
project targeted at people with developmental disabilities. Despite these and
other projects, there is a tremendous need for greater investigation in this
area.
Finally, an important part of reaching our goal of accessible,
reliable and affordable transportation for people with disabilities is Congress'
continued support for Project ACTION. As I noted earlier Project ACTION was
authorized in ISTEA and reauthorized in TEA-21. We look forward to working with
this Committee as you pursue the next generation on transportation legislation
to develop project guidelines, objectives and activities for the next six years
that will take into consideration people with disabilities and their changing
transportation needs.
Thank you again for the opportunity to appear
before you today. Your attention to this important issue is commendable. I am
happy to answer any questions or provide any additional information to the
Committee.
LOAD-DATE: July 26, 2002