|
Year: Issue:
|
Printer Friendly
Format
Volume
102 Number 03 |
January 18, 2002 |
Executive Digest
|
Congress
Information
|
Details
|
Federal Highway Funding May Drop by $9.4 Billion
Officials now estimate that
federal highway funding may drop by some $9.4 billion from the FY
2002 level, or almost 28 percent, based upon new projections of
the Revenue Aligned Budget Authority for FY 2003.
For several months, Department of Transportation officials had
conceded the possibility that the RABA provision -- that had over
three years added a $9 billion bonus to highway funding above the
obligation limits set in TEA-21 -- could turn negative. But no one
had envisioned the magnitude of a $9.4 billion cut.
"A reduction of this size in our highway program at this low
point in our economy could be devastating in terms of job losses,"
said AASHTO Executive Director John Horsley. "I can't imagine that
Congress and the Administration will allow this to occur," he
said.
The dramatic reductions are a result of new estimates issued by
the Treasury Department regarding the revenue collected in the
Highway Trust Fund. First, the Treasury Department concedes that
instead of the $30.368 billion it projected would be collected in
highway tax revenue in 2001, the actual collections were only
$26.9 billion, a shortfall of some $3.468 billion.
Secondly, Treasury projects that Highway Trust Fund receipts
for FY 2003 -- the so-called "look-ahead" factor of RABA -- will
amount to only $27.974 billion., rather than the $29.471 billion
it had forecast in TEA-21. That represents a shortfall of another
$1.49 billion.
The impact, according to AASHTO's Director of Management and
Business Development Jack Basso, former Director of Budget for the
U.S. Department of Transportation, is that the highway obligations
in FY 2003 have to be "adjusted" by some $4.9 billion below the
guaranteed level of TEA-21. When compared to the FY 2002 spending
level of $31.8 billion (which had included $4.5 billion in RABA)
the total impact is a cut of $9.4 billion.
The longer-term impact on the highway program could extend for
a number of years, since the FY 2003 funding numbers would serve
as the baseline for the calculations of the next reauthorization
legislation (AASHTO Journal, January 11).
Efforts are already underway to determine the accuracy of the
Treasury Department's estimates. The House Transportation and
Infrastructure Committee has requested that the General Accounting
Office examine the estimating process, and that review has begun.
Job Losses Projected by ARTBA
An analysis by the American Road and Transportation Builders
Association (ARTBA) concludes that even if funds were restored in
FY 2004, the magnitude of the $9 billion funding drop would result
in the loss of some 295,000 jobs over three years. Hardest hit
would be California, with the loss of more than 26,000 jobs,
followed by Texas, with projected losses of 22,000 jobs and New
York with losses of 15,000 jobs.
ARTBA has also produced a state-by-state breakdown of funding
reductions in FY 2003, should the $9 billion funding cut take
place. California is projected to lose $741 million; Texas, $626
million; New York, $414 million; Pennsylvania, $405 million; and
Florida, $376 million. A copy of the table is attached.
Accuracy of Calculations Questioned
Transportation observers were stunned and skeptical of the
Treasury Department projections that are to be used to calculate
the RABA decline.
Brad Mallory, Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of
Transportation and AASHTO President, said, "Motor fuel tax
receipts in our state, and other states around the country,
continue to be steady. The turn-around in Treasury Department
estimates for the federal Highway Trust Fund needs to be
examined."
Reports from California, Pennsylvania and Illinois all indicate
that motor fuel tax receipts increased during FY 2001, drawing
into question the accuracy of the Treasury Department's estimates.
Preliminary estimates from the Federal Highway Administration
through November show that vehicle miles traveled increased by .8
percent on the national level over the previous year.
John Horsley, AASHTO Executive Director, said, "We are
particularly appreciative of Chairman Don Young (R-FL) and Ranking
Minority Member James Oberstar (D-MN) of the Transportation and
Infrastructure Committee for initiating the GAO review of the
estimating process. It's critically important that those figures
are accurate."
DOT officials indicate that three factors contributed to the
downturn in Highway Trust Fund revenues:
- A roughly 50 percent drop occurred in truck and trailer
sales, which accounts for about $1 billion of the decline;
- An increase of more than 25 percent in the sale of gasohol
occurred between 2000 and 2001. Since gasohol is taxed at only
13 cents per gallon, compared to 18.4 cents per gallon for
gasoline, continued growth in its use would also impact Highway
Trust Fund revenue; and
- Commercial traffic grew in 2001, but not at previous rates.
Diesel fuel is taxed at 24.4 cents per gallon.
While those factors affected the FY 2001 Highway Trust Fund
receipts, they could also figure in the FY 2003 projections being
made by the Treasury Department. Congress Returns to Face Fiscal Issues
Lawmakers return to begin
the second session of the 107th Congress next Wednesday, with the
President's budget proposals, a proposed economic-stimulus package
and hearings about the bankruptcy of Enron first up on their
agenda.
In a series of recent appearances in the Midwest, President
Bush has begun to emphasize his domestic agenda, which will be
formally presented in the State of the Union address on January
29th, and in his budget proposal to be sent to Congress on
February 4. Bush is reiterating his support of the tax-cut package
enacted last year, which Democrats are attacking as a factor in
the dramatic shift of the federal budget status from
trillion-dollar surpluses to potential deficits. He said on
January 14 he would push to make the tax cuts, slated to expire in
10 years, permanent. But his strongest rhetoric has been devoted
to insisting that a repeal of the tax cuts would take place "over
my dead body."
While Democrats have been reluctant so far to call for an
actual repeal of the tax cuts, Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA) has
urged a delay in the tax cuts slated to take effect in 2004 and
2006, as well as retaining the current estate tax. Kennedy said
that times had changed dramatically since the tax cuts were
approved last year, and that the nation is unable to meet its
obligations to Social Security and Medicare -- as well as other
domestic priorities -- if the tax cuts are retained.
Meanwhile, President Bush also is stepping up pressure for
enactment of energy legislation, telling workers at the Port of
New Orleans that dependence on foreign oil is a threat to the
nation's economy. He also stressed the need for enhanced trade
authority, emphasizing that international trade generates jobs in
every sector, from agriculture to manufacturing.
Enactment of energy legislation in the Senate is likely to be
complicated by the attention being focused on the bankruptcy of
the giant energy company Enron. Congressional hearings are being
scheduled by five different committees, and the deliberations of
the administation's Energy Task Force, which have heretofore been
private, are also being scrutinized.
Transportation Issues
Transportation observers believe that one of the first issues
likely to draw Congressional attention this year will be the
potential economic effects of a $9 billion cut in federal highway
funding, which many fear may be contained in the administration's
budget. The reduction would result from adjusting highway funding
in accordance with the Revenue Aligned Budget Authority provision
of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21).
For the past three years, higher income to the Highway Trust Fund
has triggered a total of some $9 billion in extra highway
obligations. For the first time, however, it appears that reduced
revenues will force a cut below the authorized TEA-21 levels (see
related article).
States are particularly concerned about the impacts of such a
cut on transportation programs, at a time when state coffers are
also being hard-hit by the economic recession. The National
Governors Association has estimated that states are facing a
combined financial shortfall of at least $40 billion, and possibly
as much as $50 billion. Shortfalls are being reported in 36
states, according to the NGA.
Aside from the level of highway funding in FY 2003, another
possible issue is whether Congress will act under the Budget
Enforcement Act to retain the "firewalls" it contains that
guarantee highway revenues cannot be used for other purposes. The
expiration of the domestic budget caps this year give Congress the
opportunity to revisit that law, and transportation interests fear
that the hard-won firewall provisions might prove a target for
budgeteers who have long opposed them.
Yet another transportation issue that could have significant
financial impacts on the states is the future of Amtrak. The
Amtrak Reform Council faces a February 7 deadline to deliver
Congress a plan for the dissolution of the passenger-rail system.
Transportation interests are concerned that such action could
leave states holding the bag for the continuation of heavily used
commuter-rail services. (See related article).
Also in the mix will be transportation security funding. At the
insistence of the Bush Administration, appropriators held off
adding additional emergency security funding above the $40 billion
approved shortly after September 11. But no one doubts that the
issue will recur as Congress considers funds to continue the war
against terrorism as well as to harden the nation's security
defenses. AASHTO's Task Force on Transportation Security is
working to help identify the scope of needed
transportation-security measures nationwide.
Mineta:
Airline Security Deadlines will be Met
In a keynote address to the
81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board in
Washington, U.S. Transportation Secretary Norman Y. Mineta
outlined the exhaustive process that will bring U.S. DOT's new
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) into being - and said
deadlines Congress established are being met.
"We consider the law's tight deadlines as promises made to the
American people, and we will do everything humanly possible to
keep these promises," Mineta said. He also outlined a new program
in which the new TSA will borrow senior private-sector executives
as security advisors at the meeting, which was attended by more
than 8,000 delegates.
"We are building an airline security system staffed by
dedicated and competent federal aviation security agents, led by
highly experienced senior security and law-enforcement
professionals," he said. "The system will be robust and redundant,
and we will be relentless in our search for improvements. It is
better today than yesterday, and it will better still tomorrow."
Security Steps Outlined
Mineta - who declined to talk about some steps because
discussing them might compromise security - nonetheless noted that
the congressional mandate to screen all checked passenger bags
will be met, through the deployment of all machines available for
that use and, where they are not available, by use of other
allowable methods. More bags will also be sniffed by dogs trained
to detect explosives, "wiped" for explosives residues or manually
checked, and passengers should expect more personal screenings for
weapons, Mineta said.
In addition to President Bush's appointment of John Magaw of
the U.S. Secret Service to head the TSA, Mineta said a new
loaned-executive program will bring top staff from such firms as
Fluor, A.T. Kearney, Disney, Solectron, Marriott, Intel, and FedEx
into U.S. DOT to help establish the new agency, which will take in
some 30,000 employees and cover 429 airports.
"These senior advisors will work side-by-side with members of
our leadership team, for an average of six to nine months," Mineta
said.
He also asked members of the Transportation Research Board to
rise to the nation's post-September 11 challenges "with advanced
technology to meet our national needs. Once again, I know we can
count on you to answer the call," Mineta said.
Questions Remain
As U.S. DOT rolled out its airline-security responses to the
January 18 deadline set in law, some observers raised questions
about the seamlessness of the latest steps. The New York Times
quoted former Federal Aviation Security chief Billie H. Vincent as
saying even a multilayered system is not expected to be 100
percent effective. However, Vincent also noted that some measures
now planned will fall short and some deadlines will likely be
missed. Further, the steps embarked on Friday would not block
suicide bombers, the Times reported, noting that fact has been
observed by Mineta himself. Peters Outlines FHWA Priorities
The Federal Highway
Administration's top priorities will be safety and security,
environmental streamlining and stewardship, and congestion and
bottleneck mitigation, according to Administrator Mary Peters.
Peters provided her remarks during the Road Gang's annual
awards luncheon on Thursday. Along with outlining the top
priorities of the Administration, Peters provided insights on the
reauthorization of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st
Century (TEA-21) and the funding situation for FY 2003.
Through a series of meetings, the top staff of FHWA developed a
set of core themes and priorities that will guide the primary
activities of the organization, Peters said. The three
organizational areas are:
- Safety and Security - FHWA will look to improve the analysis
of crash data, and there will be increased communications
efforts with regard to highway safety counter measures coupled
with a specific focus on work zone safety. Regarding security,
Peters said that a new position was created to report to her the
agency activities related to improving the security of the
highway system. FHWA will also work with states and localities
on identifying vulnerabilities, preventing future terrorist
attacks, and developing contingency plans should an attack
occur. Peters pledged to work closely with AASHTO's Security
Task Force on these activities.
- Environmental Streamlining and Stewardship - Peters said
that FHWA will focus on protecting valuable natural resources
while looking for ways to make the environmental approval
process less onerous. She said that the agency will make
improvements through administrative actions, and will work with
Congress this year and next on making reforms to Section 4(f)
and select portions of NEPA. Peters noted that "we have to be
realistic on time schedules," and said that possibilities to
improve the process should be evaluated on a project by project
basis, not on a macro level. She added the Secretary of
Transportation Norman Mineta will soon make a decision on
whether to move forward with the proposed planning and
environmental rules or not.
- Congestion and Bottleneck Mitigation - Peters remarked that
congestion is a serious problem. She said that while adding
capacity is an important part of the solution, it is not the
only solution, and new technologies and transit play a vital
role.
Peters added that more flexibility should be provided to allow
states and localities to make choices, and also called for
improved oversight of projects.
Reauthorization - Evolution, Not Revolution
Peters also provided some general thoughts on the
reauthorization of TEA-21. Calling TEA-21 and ISTEA a "solid
base," Peters said that reauthorization will likely be an
"evolution, not revolution." Among the likely themes to be
addressed in reauthorization are continued involvement of cities
and state DOTs in the planning process; stable and predictable
funding; firewalls; minimum guarantees; and enhanced flexibility
for states and localities, thereby allowing "decisions to be made
closer to the people."
Peters added that the administration's framework for
reauthorization will be included in the president's FY 2004
budget, which will be released next February.
Peters also addressed the FY 2003 funding situation,
particularly "negative RABA." She said that the budget situation
is putting tremendous pressure on programs. Acknowledging that
there will be negative RABA, Peters said that a proper perspective
is needed by looking over the life of TEA-21. To date RABA has
provided $9 billion in additional funding. "There are ways to deal
with the RABA situation," she added. FHWA Clears HBRRP Funds for Bridge
Preventive Maintenance
In a memorandum released
January 11, Federal Highway Administration officials announced
that Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program (HBRRP
) funds can be obligated for preventive maintenance on federal-aid
highway bridges.
The determination, made with concurrence of FHWA's Office of
Chief Counsel, will add flexibility to state transportation
departments' use of federal funds. However, FHWA official King Gee
noted in his memo that "I want to emphasize that routine
maintenance remains the responsibility of the State and is not
eligible for HBRRP or other Federal-aid highway funding."
Activities deemed routine, and therefore ineligible for such
funding, would include bridge cleaning, concrete repairs, repair
and lubrication of bearings, sign maintenance, and removal of
vegetation such as roots or the cutting of grass, FHWA stated.
According to Gee's memo, "Under the legislation establishing
the HBRRP, Congress intended the funds to be used to replace or
rehabilitate deficient highway bridges so they would no longer be
deficient. We implemented the program in accordance with this
concept. However, in 1995, Congress added subsection (d) to 23
U.S. C. 116:
(d) PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE - A preventive
maintenance activity shall be eligible for Federal assistance
under this title if the State demonstrates to the satisfaction
of the Secretary that the activity is a cost-effective means of
extending the useful life of a Federal-aid highway.'"
Gee continued, "We issued guidance on this provision on March
21, 1996 ("Preventive Maintenance Revision to 23 U.S. C. 116,"
reference copy attached). Under this guidance, Federal-aid highway
funds could be used for projects to extend the service life of
existing pavements, bridges, and essential highway appurtenances.
Although bridges were cited in the 1996 guidance, HBRRP funds have
not been used for this purpose. Now, based on the 23 U.S.C. 101
definitions of "highway," which includes bridges, and "Federal-aid
highway," we agree with the Office of Chief Counsel's conclusion
that funds under the HBRRP may be obligated on all Federal-aid
highway bridges (other than bridges on roads classified as local
roads or rural minor collectors), regardless of their sufficiency
rating or deficiency status, consistent with the congressional
intent of Section 309 of the 1995
Act."
New Wetlands Regulations Announced
The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers this week announced new rules for issuing "general
permits," while reiterating the administration's commitment to the
goal of "no net loss" of wetlands.
Described by Corps officials as a compromise, the new
regulations eliminate references to "compensatory mitigation" to
give the Corps greater flexibility in mitigating wetland losses
according to the aquatic needs of the area. John Studt, regulatory
chief for the Corps, told the Washington Post, "When we
don't review projects with minimal effects on the environment, we
have more time to focus on projects that really do have an
impact." According to the Post, the Corps must consider
some 80,000 permits per year.
Among the changes from the regulations advanced by the Clinton
Administration are the following:
- Individual permits must be obtained for projects affecting
more than 300 feet of "year-round" streams;
- Compliance with state and local water quality practices will
suffice to meet water quality requirements under the permitting
process;
- Waivers of the one-for-one mitigation of adverse impacts
requirement are allowed at the discretion of the Corps, although
one-for-one "is often the most environmentally appropriate form
of mitigation."
Details on the revised regulations are included in the January
15 Federal Register. Tougher Security Urged for Drivers
Licensing
The American Association of
Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA) have called for greater
uniformity and security in the issuance of drivers' licenses
nationwide.
At an AAMVA press conference on Monday, Deputy Secretary for
Safety Administration of the Pennsylvania DOT Betty Serian, chair
of the association's ID Security Task Force, said "Our drivers'
license has become the most requested form of identification.
Because the American people depend on this one card, AAMVA has a
responsibility and obligation to do whatever it can to enhance the
security of this document to improve public safety and national
security."
Serian added, "Unscrupulous individuals shop for the easiest
and fastest way to get a license. They find the loopholes and they
put you and me at risk. And without changes to our current
business practices, we cannot be assured that everyone presenting
a driver's license isn't who they say they are."
AAMVA has called for increased uniformity across the states in
the issuance of drivers' licenses, and more uniform practices for
issuing licenses to non-U.S. citizens. Among its recommended
strategies are:
- Improving and standardizing initial drivers' license and ID
card processes;
- Standardizing the definition of residency;
- Establishing uniform procedures for non-U.S. citizens
seeking licenses;
- Implementing processes to produce a uniform, secure and
interoperable drivers' license/ID card to uniquely identify an
individual;
- Establishing methods for the prevention and detection of
fraud and for auditing of licensing processes;
- Ensuring greater enforcement priority and penalties;
- Seeking federal support of the objectives; and
- Establishing public awareness and support.
Maryland Lawmakers Worry About Unexpected Wilson Bridge
Costs
Key legislators in Maryland
told the Washington Post this week they are startled by the
size of the single bid for superstructure work on new sections of
the Woodrow Wilson Bridge over the Potomac River - suggesting work
will be at best delayed and at worst halted if some non-state
funding source is not identified.
Officials at the Maryland Department of Transportation, which
has responsibility for building that portion of the new bridge as
a joint project with the State of Virginia and the Federal Highway
Administration, were surprised recently when only one bid for the
work came in, and came in $372 million over budget, the Post
reported. In its current cash-strapped condition, Maryland
lawmakers said, the state can't afford to eat the difference, and
re-bidding the job will add at least five months to the
construction schedule at one of the region's worst traffic
bottlenecks.
A panel of transportation experts is reviewing the bid in an
attempt to determine why it came in so high. Its findings are
expected by mid-February.
"This is the first time I've ever said to myself, 'This bridge
is in jeopardy,'" Del. Peter Franchot, D-Montgomery County,
chairman of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on
Transportation, told the Post. Though Congress has capped its
financial involvement in the project at $1.5 billion - leaving the
states to absorb the remaining cost of the rebuilding the bridge -
officials in Virginia and Maryland have assumed a total cost of
$2.4 billion for the overall project. State and federal engineers
had predicted the twin spans would cost $487 million; instead, the
sole bid on that portion of the project came in at $859.9 million.
Franchot said he doesn't expect the federal government to make
up the difference, "and I know we're not going to pay it ...
unless something radical happens, that bridge is not going to be
built," he said.
Current work on the bridge's foundations will continue.
Maryland Transportation Secretary John D. Porcari told the
Appropriations Subcommittee that the state will not accept the
lone bid. Carlson to Chair TRB Executive Panel; TRB Delivers Awards
E. Dean Carlson, the Kansas
Department of Transportation Secretary who recently concluded a
year as President of AASHTO, was named Chairman of the
Transportation Research Board's Executive Committee for the year
2002, it was announced at the TRB Annual Meeting.
TRB also made awards to several transportation specialists,
including awards for distinguished service and several awards to
the authors of research papers in various categories.
Carlson has served as KDOT Secretary since January of 1995,
following his retirement in 1994 as the Executive Director of the
Federal Highway Administration, which is the highest career
position in the agency. He served 36 years with FHWA in a variety
of management positions; he also has been active in formal TRB
activities for years, including service on the Executive Committee
and holding its vice-chairmanship last year. Carlson was also
honored at the Road Gang's annual meeting on January 17th. He
received the group's Lester P. Lamm Memorial Award for 2001.
Lillian C. Borrone, who retired as Assistant Executive Director
of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey in 2000, received
TRB's W.N. Carey Jr. Distinguished Service Award recognizing
individuals who have given outstanding leadership and service to
transportation research, and to the board, while Joseph M.
Sussman, the J R East professor of Civil and Environmental
Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, was
honored with TRB's Roy W. Crum Award for Distinguished Service for
his research on railroads, ITS and other large integrated systems.
TRB also inaugurated its new Sharon D. Banks Award for
Innovative Leadership in Transportation with honors to Naomi W.
Lede, senior research scientist at the Texas Transportation
Institute. The award recognizes sustained leadership
accomplishments and innovations that exemplify the "caring nature
and depth of character" of the award's namesake, the former
general manager of AC Transit in Oakland California who chaired
the TRB Executive Committee in 1998. Lede has been deeply involved
in mentoring and training programs that bring minority junior- and
senior-high-school students into transportation work, and to urge
them to excellence in science and mathematics.
A. George
Ostensen Will Head FHWA's Safety Core Business Unit
AASHTO's Project Finance Institute Announces First Two
Courses
AASHTO announced this week
it will hold a pair of two-day seminars - in Washington and Los
Angeles - to inaugurate its Project Finance Institute, formed to
help state and local officials or others considering new financing
tools for transportation infrastructure use them well.
Each of the two workshops will admit 30 participants. The first
session will be March 13-15 on the University of Southern
California's main campus in Los Angeles. The same course material
will be offered in Washington , D.C., May 13-15. The courses will
be taught by a combination of fulltime USC faculty and
distinguished industry practitioners.
The sessions will include a combination of lectures and case
studies, with an emphasis on team practicums in which participants
will have an opportunity to propose solutions to real-life
transportation finance issues. Admission will generally be on a
first-come, first-served basis, with tuition of $1,595 for the
2-1/2 day program.
AASHTO's Project Finance Institute is a partnering arrangement
with USC for finance-oriented professional development for senior
policymakers and program managers. The program is partially
financed by a cooperative agreement between USC and the U.S.
Department of Transportation.
Policy issues and financial practices to be explored will
include:
- Developing comprehensive plans of finance for major
transportation investments;
- Determining when and under what terms partnerships with
private-sector entities may be appropriate;
- Understanding the role of the capital markets as a funding
source; and
- Employing non-traditional project finance and development
techniques.
For further information, please contact Tammy Sindall in the
Office of Business Development, AASHTO, 444 N. Capitol St. N.W.
Suite 249, Washington, DC 20001. She can be reached at (202)
624-3531 and at tsindall@aashto.org FHWA Seeking Federal Highway Lands
Division Engineer, Director of Asset Management
The Federal Lands Highway
Administration of the U.S. DOT's Federal Highway Administration
has an opening for Division Engineer (ES-801) at its office in
Sterling, Virginia.
The salary range is $125,972 - $137,901 per year including
locality pay. Federal Lands Highway provides engineering for
planning, design and rehabilitation of highways and bridges on, or
giving access to, federally owned lands.
Affected roads include forest highways, public lands highways,
park roads and parkways, refuge roads, and Indian reservation
roads. The Federal Lands Highway Division Engineer provides
executive direction over the activities within the division to
effectively promote, implement and administer the total FLH
Program within the multi-state geographical area of the division
office.
FHWA also has an opening for Director of its Office of Asset
Management (ES-301) at its Infrastructure Core Business Unit in
Washington, DC. The salary range is $125,972 - $138,200 per year
including includes locality pay. The Office of Asset Management
provides national leadership in the systematic management of
highway infrastructure assets. Its director provides executive
program direction and strategic planning in assisting states to
systematically develop, implement, evaluate, and upgrade highway
and related transportation assets.
For more information about either of these openings contact
Susan Wheelock at (202) 366-2596 or at http://www.transportation.org/publications/journal.nsf/SearchSite/exres.hahr@fhwa.dot.gov.
Los Angeles
Seeks General Manager for its Department of Transportation
The city of Los Angeles,
California seeks a General Manager for its Department of
Transportation, which serves the nation's second-most populous
city with 3.7 million residents.
The Los Angeles DOT develops and implements programs to meet
the ground transportation needs of the traveling public, including
traffic management, transit systems, and the regulation of
taxicabs. It has a proposed annual FY 2001-2002 budget of $110.2
million with 1,950 staff.
The General Manager plans, organizes, coordinates and
administers all departmental functions and activities. Applicants
for the position must hold a relevant bachelor's degree (BA or BS)
though a master's is preferred, and demonstrate at least five
years of significant, high-level management experience in a
mid-sized to large public agency or private-sector firm which
deals with complex transportation issues, operations and programs.
Annual salary $149,167 to $223,708; EEO/ADA; female, minority and
disabled candidates are encouraged to apply.
Send resumes by February 15, 2002 to Maximus, Attn: Norman
Roberts or Marsha Noble, 10474 Santa Monica Blvd #208, Los
Angeles, CA 90025. The fax number is (310) 475-8007 and e-mail is
mailto:searchla@maximux.com.
AASHTO
Appointment
President Brad Mallory has
announced an appointment to an AASHTO Committee:
Bruce Warner, Oregon, named as Chair of the Standing Committee
on Highway Traffic Safety, replacing Terry Mulcahy who is
retiring.
| |