|
Year: Issue:
|
Printer Friendly
Format
Volume
101 Number 16 |
April 20, 2001 |
Executive Digest
|
Congress
Information
States
AASHTO
|
Details
|
Budget Resolution Awaits Congress Upon Return
Congress returns next week
with to resolve differences between the respective House and
Senate versions of the FY 2002 budget blueprints. Secretary of
Transportation Norman Mineta will testify on April 25 before a
House subcommittee and on April 26 before a Senate subcommittee on
the Department's budget proposal.
Congressional staff have
been pouring over the FY 2002 budget proposal submitted by
President George W. Bush on April 9 during the two-week recess,
and lawmakers will be focusing on finding a compromise between the
House and Senate versions, especially regarding the size of a tax
cut. The House of Representatives approved a budget resolution
that closely mirrors the Administration's proposal, including
allowance of a $1.6 trillion tax cut and keeping the rate of
increased spending at close to 4 percent. The Senate's budget
proposal trims the tax cut by almost a quarter to $1.2 trillion,
and would provide an additional 8 percent in spending over last
year's level.
Conferees on the FY 2002 budget proposal will
meet soon to attempt to iron out the differences. Many analysts
predict that conferees will split the difference between the
proposals by providing a $1.45 billion tax cut and spending
increases of 6 percent.
Overall, the budget resolution is
not binding, but establishes a blueprint with spending ceilings.
Once approved, it will be up to appropriators to divvy up the
money for the different federal programs.
Mineta to
Testify
Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta will
testify before the House Transportation Appropriations
Subcommittee on Wednesday, April 25, and before the Senate
Transportation Appropriations Subcommittee the next day. During
the hearing, Mineta will likely provide specific details on the
Administration's transportation proposal (
AASHTO Journal, April 13).
Mineta may be
questioned by subcommittee members on changes the Administration
proposed to certain transportation programs. In particular, the
DOT's FY 2002 budget proposes a number of changes to funding
distribution practices for transit programs, including:
- distributing bus funds from a discretionary grant to a
formula, based on population and density factors;
- changing the traditional 80/20 percent split for federal
and state contributions for new start projects to 50/50;
and
- creating a formula for the distribution of funding under
the Job Access and Reverse Commute program based upon a
state's share of low income residents.
Bush's First 100 Days
Transportation has fared
well in President George W. Bush's first 100 days in office, but
significant challenges with energy supply and demand await in the
near future.
Transportation advocates have seen positive
signs from the Bush administration's first 100 days, including a
budget proposal that fully funds the highway, aviation and transit
programs at their authorized levels. The overall funding levels
were not reportedly in the initial budget, however, with the
Office of Management and Budget intending to rein in spending.
Heavy pressure from industry and other advocates helped to
eventually boost funding to record levels in the FY 2002 budget
proposal.
Bush followed through on his promise to select a
Democrat for his cabinet, appointing Norman Mineta as his
Secretary of Transportation. A former chair of the House
Infrastructure and Public Works Committee, Mineta's appointment
was met with unanimous approval by Congress. Upon taking his
position as secretary, Mineta cited transportation safety and
easing congestion, especially at airports, as the top priorities
of the administration.
Bush immediately took steps to hold
up a number of regulations from the previous Administration for
further review, including the proposed rulemakings of the Federal
Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration to
implement the environmental streamlining provisions of TEA-21 and
NEPA requirements. There has been no official indication from the
Administration on the status of those rulemakings to
date.
Looking ahead, the Administration will likely face a
big challenge in addressing recent indications that energy
supplies will be extremely tight, with demand soaring. Similar to
last year, gasoline prices are starting to climb, with some areas
in the Midwest paying over $2 a gallon. A special task force
headed by Vice President Dick Cheney is at work developing
recommendations for release in May, which will reportedly focus on
ways to increase domestic supplies, along with some
recommendations to curb demand.
At the same time, all
signs point to even more aviation congestion this year. The
Administration and Congress will be under pressure to provide
immediate relief to air travelers. The issue has loomed large in
Mineta's appearances before Congress, and the Administration is
supporting efforts to allow airlines anti-trust protection to meet
to discuss short-term remedies. Comment Period Extended on Persons with
Limited English Guidance
The U.S. Department of
Transportation has extended the comment period for guidance it
issued in January, 2001 regarding services to persons with limited
English proficiency. The comment period is extended from March 23
to May 29, 2001.
The Department of Transportation issued
the guidance in the January 22, 2001 Federal Register.
While DOT is now seeking comments, the guidance was made effective
on the day the notice was published in the Register. The
DOT guidance implements an executive order issued by then
President Bill Clinton on August 11, 2000, that directed federal
agencies to develop guidance on how recipients of federal funding
should assess and address the needs of limited English proficient
(LEP) persons.
Overall, the guidance clarifies the
responsibilities of DOT funding recipients in ensuring that LEP
persons have sufficient access to transportation programs and
activities, based on Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. It states
that "recipients must take reasonable steps to ensure that such
persons have meaningful access to the programs, services and
information those recipients provide, free of charge." The
guidance serves as a "legal framework" to assist recipients in
conducting an assessment of their current services.
Included in the guidance are specific elements identified
by DOT of an effective language assistance program, such
as:
- A thorough assessment of the language assistance needs of
the population and communities served by the
recipient;
- Written language assistance plans;
- Effective methods to notify LEP persons of their rights to
assistance and its availability free of charge; and
- Continual monitoring of assistance programs and staff
training.
Among the factors that recipients should
consider in order to determine if they are taking reasonable steps
to ensure access are:
- the number and proportion of persons affected if language
barriers are not removed;
- the frequency with which LEP persons are affected by the
program or activity, along with the importance of the
activity;
- the overall resources available to the recipient; and
- the level of services being provided to English proficient
persons, and whether LEP persons are being excluded from the
same services.
The Department of Transportation
outlines three primary ways of providing language services,
including oral language interpretation, the translation of written
materials, and the use of alternative communication methods and
devices. The last method includes the possibility of using symbol
signs, standard symbol signs, diagrams, color-coded warning,
illustrations, graphics and pictures.
Prior to the May 29,
2001 deadline for comments, AASHTO will examine the guidance to
assess the implications for state transportation programs,
projects and services, and will provide comments to the U.S.
Department of Transportation. Individual states may want to
provide comments to U.S. DOT, and AASHTO requests that copies of
state comments be forwarded to AASHTO.
The notice can be
found on the DOT web site at http://dms.dot.gov/search/ and typing in 8696 as
the docket number.
EPA to Proceed with Dredging Rule
The Environmental Protection
Agency and Army Corps of Engineers announced this week that they
will proceed with a controversial wetlands regulation defining
dredged materials.
The regulation was one of many placed on
hold by the incoming Bush Administration to allow agency heads to
review last-minute rulemakings by the prior administration. The
regulation was originally published on January 17, and
Administration officials said on Monday that they will release the
final rule without change.
EPA Administrator Christine Todd
Whitman issued a statement saying, "The protection of America's
vanishing wetlands is a vital step toward ensuring cleaner water
for everyone." The regulation was issued in response to a federal
court decision last year regarding the "Tulloch rule." The court
maintained that the federal agencies had overstepped their
authority in regulating the ditching of certain wetlands. That
rule required a Clean Water Act dredging permit on the grounds
that incidental fallback from dredging activities constituted a
discharge to U.S. waters.
The new regulation specifically
defines incidental fallback as being material that is redeposited
to the area from which it was taken. Permitting agencies are
authorized to make case-by-case determinations on whether permits
are required. The regulation may impact transportation agencies
that have responsibility for maintenance of drainage ditches and
other dredging activity.
The new regulation is likely to be
the subject of renewed litigation. A suit has already been filed
by the National Association of Home Builders based upon the
publication of the rule on January
17.
FHWA
Addressing Environmental Disputes
Seeking to implement
provisions of TEA-21, the Federal Highway Administration is
circulating a discussion draft of procedures for resolving
environmental disputes among agencies at the state and federal
level.
The draft posted on the FHWA web site addresses
Section 1309(c) of TEA-21 which requires that if timely action on
environmental permits or reviews is not achieved, the Secretary of
Transportation must act to resolve the disputes and close the
record.
The proposal states that "Environmentally
responsible transportation improvements, delivered on time and
within budget, is a vision that all to often eludes the Department
and its various partners. Public demands for transportation
solutions today, not ten years from now, are understandable given
the magnitude and pervasiveness of America' transportation
problems. Equally understandable is the public's desire for
environmental protection and enhancement. Sometimes these two
goals appear to be at odds and conflict results. When this
conflict takes the form of disputes among transportation and
environmental agencies at the state and federal levels, projects
can be delayed considerably."
To address such issues the
discussion paper proposes a four-part conflict management and
dispute resolution system that includes:
- guidance for agencies in resolving disputes as they arise
in the project development processes using both unassisted and
assisted problem-solving;
- training courses to help agency staff understand the
dispute resolution guidance and to develop more effective
problem-solving and collaboration skills;
- access to qualified third-party neutrals who can provide
professional assistance in resolving disputes; and
- procedures for elevating disputes to the Secretary of the
Department under Section 1309(c) of TEA-21.
The
process is intended to apply to federal agencies and state
agencies with federally designated authority, during environmental
reviews of highways and transit projects that are federally
funded. This includes the NEPA process and Section 404 permits, as
well as endangered species reviews.
Bill Addresses Rural Air Strips
While environmentalists see
them as an intrusion into nature, pilots see them as life-saving
emergency landing strips, prompting Congress to enter into the
battle over the closing of airstrips in wilderness
areas.
Senator Michael D. Crapo (R-ID) has introduced
legislation (S. 681) requiring the Departments of Interior and
Agriculture to consult with state aviation departments and the
Federal Aviation Administration before attempting to close rural
airstrips on federal land. It would also require 90 days public
notice in the Federal Register before an airstrip could be
closed.
A one-year prohibition was attached to an
appropriations measure last year, but legislators want to make the
requirement permanent. The bill is backed by the Airline Owners
and Pilots Association, which maintains that the strips are
critical emergency landing areas for firefighters and endangered
aircraft. The bill reportedly has the support of the chairmen of
the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Don Young (R-AK)
and the Resources Committee, James Hansen
(R-UT).
Mass Transit Ridership Continues to Grow
According to a report
released on Monday by the American Public Transportation
Association (APTA), the increase in transit use has grown for the
fifth straight year.
The APTA report said transit riders
took 9.4 billion trips last year, an increase of 3.5 percent.
Transportation modes that are showing the largest ridership
increase for 2000 were: heavy rail (subways) at 7.6 percent;
demand response or paratransit at 5.9 percent; light rail at 5.3
percent; and commuter rail at 5.2 percent.
Locations where
transit use increased were across the board -- coast to coast and
with differing populations. The Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority showed the largest ridership increase on
heavy rail at 60.6 percent, and ridership increased by 40.6
percent on Denver's Regional Transportation District light rail.
The overall increase in light rail use was heavily influenced by
new lines and extensions in Salt Lake City, in preparation for the
2002 Olympic Winter Games. The Altamont Commuter Express system in
the San Jose area continued to lead commuter rail increases with a
66.1 percent.
Bus ridership increased 1.5 percent for
systems of all sizes. Among large cities, the Washington Metro
Area Transit Authority grew the most, at 8.44 percent. Smaller bus
systems in Albany, NY, Bakersfield, CA, Bloomington, IN, and
Bowling Green, KY posted significant increases in ridership.
APTA attributes the continued growth in public
transportation ridership to the economy, expansion of service,
higher investment levels by federal, state, and local foundations,
and enhanced customer services that meet travelers' needs.
"Easy-to-use quality public transportation provides access,
freedom, and mobility to help people do what is important to
them," APTA President Bill Millar
said.
16
Transportation Projects Highlight Environmental Successes
Outstanding examples of
"Environmental Successes in Transportation Project Development"
have been summarized in a new report issued by AASHTO this
week.
"The old stereotype of state transportation
departments brushing aside environmental concerns in the name of
transportation is simply no longer the case," the report states.
The report is a product of the National Cooperative Highway
Research Program and was published by AASHTO. It cites projects in
states from Florida to California, selected from a total of 45
case studies submitted for review by 18 states, Metropolitan
Planning Organizations, local transportation agencies and transit
agencies. It was unveiled at the joint meeting of the AASHTO
Standing Committee on Environment and Standing Committee on
Planning at their meeting last week in New Orleans.
AASHTO
Executive Director John Horsley said, "State transportation
departments today are listening to our customers; and nowhere is
that more evident than in the state DOTs' commitment to develop
transportation projects in a way that also enhances the
environment. That is what the public expects and what we must
deliver. I'm proud to see recognition of these outstanding
examples, appropriately in conjunction with our nation's
celebration of Earth Day."
The report focuses on a variety
of ways in which transportation project development has advanced
including: process management, improved scoping, visualization
techniques, technology application, context-sensitive design, and
conflict avoidance and dispute resolution.
Case studies
range from New York State DOT's "New Ethic" Environmental
Initiative, to the South Carolina Sandy Island Mitigation in which
an entire, pristine ecosystem was protected from commercial
development, providing a habitat for endangered species as a
wetland bank while lowering the cost of project by project
mitigation. Other transportation projects included are from
California, Connecticut, Florida, Maryland, Minnesota, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Washington, and Wisconsin.
"These are all
'good news' stories that deserve to be told," Horsley said. Copies
of the report are available from AASHTO headquarters by calling
(202) 624-5800. It can also be accessed via the AASHTO web site at
transportation.org.
Transportation Secretary Mineta
Announces 2001 Environmental Excellence Awards
U.S. Secretary of
Transportation Norman Mineta on Tuesday announced the 13
recipients of the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) 2001
Environmental Excellence Awards.
The biennial FHWA awards
recognize outstanding partnering and projects that promote
environmental excellence in the 50 states, Puerto Rico, and the
District of Columbia. "These public-private efforts are good
examples of environmental stewardship and successful partnering,"
said Vincent Schimmoller, FHWA deputy executive director. "They
inspire us to act responsibly, protecting and enhancing the
environment without compromising mobility or causing financial
hardship."
Projects that received Environmental Excellence
Awards are in California, Florida, Minnesota, New Jersey, New
York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Puerto
Rico. Honorable mentions include Arizona, Iowa, New Jersey, New
York, and Texas. FHWA received 145 nominations from 31 states,
Puerto Rico, and D.C.
Schimmoller and Cynthia Burbank, FHWA
Planning and Environment program manager, will present the awards
on April 20 at an Earth Day ceremony in Washington, D.C.
A
full list of award-winners and their projects can be accessed at
www.fhwa.gov under the Press Room link.
McCaleb
Gets the Nod for Indian Affairs Position
President Bush on Tuesday
announced that he will nominate Oklahoma Department of
Transportation Secretary Neal McCaleb to head the Bureau of Indian
Affairs (BIA).
"I am honored the president would consider
me for this position of great importance for all tribes," McCaleb
said in the Oklahoman. Interior Secretary Gale Norton said
of McCaleb, "His compassion for Indian issues, decisive management
skills, and ability to facilitate dialogue will help to improve
this program and the relationship of the department with Indian
tribes around the country."
The Assistant Secretary for
Indian Affairs is responsible for providing services to the 561
federally recognized tribes of American Indians and natives of
Alaska.
State officials are expressing interest in filling
McCaleb's position as transportation secretary. The
Oklahoman reported Herschal Crow, state Transportation
Commission chairman, and Delmas Ford, former state transportation
secretary under Governor David Walters, are eyeing the position.
John Cox, Governor Frank Keating's press secretary, said the
governor's staff will begin looking for a replacement if McCaleb
is confirmed for the BIA position.
West Virginia Continues Gas Tax Rate
The West Virginia
legislature has voted to continue the state's 20.5 cent per gallon
gasoline tax rate until August 2007.
The gas tax was
temporarily increased by five cents in 1993 specifically to match
increased federal highway funding. It was scheduled to revert to
15.5 cents on August 1, 2001.
At the request of Governor
Bob Wise and Transportation Secretary Fred Van Kirk the
legislature voted to retain the gasoline tax rate, but also to
remove the restriction that the funds be used only for matching
federal dollars. The five-cent portion of the tax generates
approximately $55 million annually.
AASHTO Planning and Environment
Committees Hold Joint Meeting
The AASHTO Standing
Committee on Planning and Standing Committee on the Environment
held a joint meeting on April 8-11 in New Orleans, Louisiana.
Issues of mutual concern were discussed, and the committees
approved resolutions to be considered by the AASHTO Board of
Directors during the May 17-21 AASHTO Spring Meeting in
Wichita.
The joint meeting included plenary and breakout
sessions that dealt with issues such as environmental
streamlining, environmental stewardship, environmental research,
FHWA/FTA planning and NEPA proposed regulations, air quality, and
TEA-21 reauthorization. Approximately 190 people attended the
four-day meeting, including state DOT planning and environmental
staff, Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit
Administration officials, private sector representatives, and EPA
and other federal environmental resource agency
personnel.
Dr. Kam Movassaghi, secretary of the Louisiana
Department of Transportation and Development, welcomed the
participants as the host state. Larry Perret, assistant secretary
for Planning and Programming, moderated a session highlighting
Louisiana activities, including the New Orleans Rail Gateway
Project, the I-49 Connector, and the Louisiana Intermodal
Transportation Plan Update.
AASHTO Executive Director John
Horsley addressed the meeting participants and discussed the
importance of collaboration between the AASHTO Planning and
Environment Committees because of the linkage between the two
committees on a number of major environmental issues.
Leroy
Irwin, environmental director for the Florida DOT, discussed his
agency's work over the past year to implement a more efficient and
timely transportation decision-making process in conjunction with
federal and state environmental agencies. He described the process
to develop Florida's "Efficient Transportation Decision Making
(ETDM) While Protecting Florida's Environment" program. He said
that he and his staff have met with environmental groups around
the State to talk about ways to develop transportation projects
while enhancing the environment. Additional information about
Florida's new approach is available on the Florida DOT web site at
www.dot.state.fl.us/emo.
During its business session on
Tuesday, the AASHTO Standing Committee on Planning passed a
resolution urging that U.S. DOT not take action to advance a
general update to the rules on Planning and NEPA until after
TEA-21 reauthorization. The resolution recommends that U.S. DOT
formally close the Planning and NEPA dockets that were opened last
May without taking any action. These dockets dealt with Notices of
Proposed Rulemaking on planning and NEPA provisions to implement
TEA-21. The AASHTO Board of Directors will consider this
resolution on May 20 in Wichita.
The Standing Committee on
the Environment approved two resolutions at its business session.
The first one urges U.S. DOT to demonstrate its commitment to the
streamlining mandate of TEA-21 by giving immediate attention to
AASHTO's short-term recommendations for improvement of the Section
4(f) process. These recommendations were included on pages 29-34
of AASHTO's response to U.S. DOT docket 99-5989 regarding Proposed
Regulations for NEPA and Related Procedures for 4(f). The
resolution calls upon U.S. DOT to develop regulatory and statutory
proposals for a single consolidated process that would eliminate
overlap of Section 106 and Section 4(f) requirements for historic
properties impacted by federal aid transportation proposals. The
resolution also urges Congress to modify Titles 23 and 49 to
eliminate overlap with the requirements of the National Historic
Preservation Act, including the consideration to remove historic
properties from Section 4(f), and to establish a single
consolidated process for protecting historic
properties.
The second resolution approved by the Standing
Committee on the Environment expresses AASHTO's support for
flexibility to pursue programmatic and/or outcome based approaches
to streamlining by allowing each state to develop the method by
which they can most effectively achieve the goals set forth by
Congress. Further, it encourages federal agencies to provide
specific recommendations and pursue changes in statute,
regulations and guidance that will result in overall program
simplification protecting and enhancing the
environment.
The resolution also expresses support for
carrying out the spirit of the NEPA rule while eliminating
wasteful project-based paperwork and approvals. Further, it calls
upon U.S. DOT to report annually, in consultation with appropriate
natural and cultural resource agencies, to Congress on the status
of streamlining efforts and best practices for environmental
streamlining. The AASHTO Board of Directors will consider both of
these resolutions approved by the Standing Committee on the
Environment at its May 20 meeting.
The meeting concluded
with a discussion of AASHTO's TEA-21 reauthorization activities.
AASHTO Vice President Brad Mallory, chair of AASHTO's
reauthorization effort, moderated the session, which included
reports on highway and transit needs, the effects of
transportation investment and finance, program delivery, and
interjurisdictional issues.
Virginia DOT Smart Road Featured on
AASHTO Web Site
This week's featured story
on the AASHTO web site, www.transportation.org, is about the
Virginia Department of Transportation's (VDOT) Smart
Road.
The Smart Road is a cooperative venture among VDOT,
Virginia Tech's Transportation Institute, and the Federal Highway
Administration to simulate various driving conditions to improve
highway safety.
AASHTO Appointments
President Dean Carlson has
announced the following appointments to AASHTO
committees:
John Craig, Nebraska Department of Roads,
appointed as vice chair of the Asset Management Task Force for a
two-year term;
Albert Goke, Montana DOT, appointed to the
Standing Committee on Highway Traffic Safety as a governor's
highway safety representative for a four-year term;
Gary
Hoffman, Pennsylvania DOT, appointed as vice chair of the Highway
Subcommittee on Maintenance for a two-year term to replace Ray
Bass of Alabama, whose term has expired;
William Moore,
Tennessee DOT, reappointed as chair of the Highway Subcommittee on
Traffic Engineering for a second two-year term;
Richard
Quesenberry, Military Traffic Management Command, appointed to the
Standing Committee on Highway Traffic Safety as a Federal
Associate Member for a four-year term;
Rod Roberson, New
Jersey DOT, appointed to the Standing Committee on Highway Traffic
Safety for a four-year term, representing Region I;
Jim
Slifer, Illinois DOT, appointed as chair of the U.S. Route
Numbering Committee for a two-year term to replace Leon Kenison of
New Hampshire, who has retired;
David Sprynczynatyk, North
Dakota DOT, appointed as chair of the Highway Subcommittee on
Maintenance for a two-year term, to replace Tom Norton of
Colorado, whose term has expired;
Paul Wells, New York
State DOT, appointed to the Standing Committee on Highway Traffic
Safety for a four-year term, representing Region I; and
Terecia Wilson, South Carolina DOT, appointed to the
Standing Committee on Highway Traffic Safety for a four-year term,
representing Region II.
2001 International Bridge Conference
Slated for June
AASHTO is cosponsoring the
2001 International Bridge Conference, scheduled for June 4-6 at
the Hilton Pittsburgh and Towers. The theme of this year's
conference is "Preserving Legacies and Designing Landmarks" with
New York as the featured state.
The conference will focus
on the practice of bridge engineering. New York State
Transportation Commissioner Joseph Boardman will deliver the
keynote address. Other featured speakers include: Sherwin-Williams
CEO Christopher Conner; Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas
CEO Tom O'Neill; and Peter Kiewit Sons' CEO Ken Stinson.
The International Bridge Conference was initiated in 1984
to further the advancement of the engineering profession through
the professional improvement of its members and service to the
community. For more information, contact Jim Cooper from the
Federal Highway Administration at (202)
493-3023.
| |