|
Year: Issue:
|
Printer Friendly
Format
Volume
101 Number 22 |
June 1, 2001 |
Executive Digest
|
Congress
Information
|
Details
|
Senate to Convene with a New Majority
Senators will return to a
new regime next week, in which Democrats hold the majority,
requiring a reorganization of everything from committee chairs to
the power-sharing agreement reached by leaders in January. Senator
Jim Jeffords, now an Independent from Vermont, will likely chair
the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.
The
departure of Jeffords from the Republican party has produced what
the Congressional Quarterly Daily Monitor called a "seismic shift"
in the Senate, with impacts ranging from the replacement of Trent
Lott (R-MS) with Tom Daschle (D-SD) as Majority leader, to the
shuffle of majority and minority committee office
spaces.
Most observers maintain that the slim one-vote
Democratic majority in the Senate will still require a bipartisan
approach to legislation, or a "tri-partisan" approach as Senator
Daschle suggested this week. But they also agree that the change
will have a significant impact on the Senate's agenda, and the way
in which Bush legislative proposals are received, including energy
and environmental legislation.
Aside from new chairmen
across the board, there are unlikely to be major changes to
committee membership, although Democrats appear likely to assume
the one-member majority on each panel that the Republicans had
previously enjoyed. Still, the so called "power-sharing" agreement
reached between the two parties earlier this year is now
considered null and void, and subject to
renegotiation.
Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV), who will regain
his former position as Chairman of the Appropriations Committee,
said this week that he will abide by the FY 2002 budget resolution
and the $661.3 billion discretionary spending ceiling which it
contains. However, he reportedly does intend to revisit the
Subcommittee allocations (known as the 302(b)s) to reflect
Democratic priorities.
Jeffords to Move From Health to
Environment
Jeffords' shift to Independent status
reportedly came with an agreement by Democrats that Senator Harry
Reid (D-NV) will surrender his opportunity to chair the
Environment and Public Works Committee, to allow Jeffords to take
that seat. Jeffords had been the Chairman of the Health,
Education, Labor and Pensions, which will now go to Senator Edward
Kennedy (D-MA).
In assuming the chair of the transportation
authorizing committee, Jeffords will be following in the footsteps
of Senator and former Chairman Robert Stafford (R-VT), who
Jeffords was elected to replace in 1988 after Stafford's
retirement. Jeffords has been a strong supporter of wind and
solare energy projects, and as a history buff is keenly interested
in historic preservation. He worked to ensure that the National
Historic Covered Bridge Preservation Act was included in the
TEA-21 legislation in 1998. Jeffords is a graduate of Harvard Law
School, and served in the state legislature and as state attorney
general before being elected to the House of Representatives in
1974, where he served six terms. FAA Releases Report on Environmental
Reviews of Airport Projects
While the federal
environmental review process for new runway projects average over
three years, a number of other factors, including public
opposition, contribute to the 10-year average time it takes to
build new runways, according to a report issued by the Federal
Aviation Administration last week.
The report contains
current activities by the FAA and future recommendations to
streamline the environmental review process. It was mandated under
Section 310 of the Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the
21st Century (AIR-21), which directed the Secretary of
Transportation to study the federal environmental requirements
related to the planning and approval of airport improvement
projects. FAA Administrator Jane Garvey unveiled the report before
a hearing of the House Subcommittee on Aviation on May
24.
Garvey noted that 31 airports in the country account
for 70 percent of passenger travel, and that 25 of these airports
account for 86 percent of severe air traffic delays nationwide. At
these 31 airports, 18 new runways are in the planning stage
between now and 2010. Nine projects have received environmental
approval, while environmental impact statements (EISs) are
currently underway for five other projects.
In his opening
remarks Subcommittee Chairman John Mica (R-FL) said "we have not
built enough runway capacity to keep pace with air travel demand.
We are all frustrated by the amount of time it takes to build a
new runway. It is just too long."
Although supportive of
finding ways to improve the environmental review process, Mica and
other members cautioned that environmental protections should not
be compromised. Rep. Jim Oberstar (D-MN), Ranking Member of the
full Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, said that while
he would support reforms to speed up the environmental process, "I
will not support streamlining that is merely a thinly-disguised
cover for limiting environmental protections or due
process."
Report Recommendations According to the
FAA report, an average of three and a half years is needed to
complete environmental impact statements (EIS) for new runways,
which accounts for one-third of the 10-year average time it takes
to complete the planning process for a runway project. The FAA
notes, however, that eliminating the EIS process would not
necessarily equate to a three year reduction in the planning
process, since there are numerous additional tasks that must be
completed.
Several additional federal, state and local
permits outside the FAA's purview must also be undertaken. For
example, the FAA must account for approximately 40 separate
federal laws and regulations in addition to NEPA, along with
numerous state environmental requirements. Completing these
reviews can be difficult given the differing missions of federal
and state regulatory agencies and limited staffing to conduct
reviews.
Even more daunting is local opposition to
projects. The report states "the underlying environmental
impediment to airport expansion is not the environmental review
process. It is the opposition on environmental grounds to airport
expansion." Concerns over additional noise from expanded runway
capacity are the primary cause of public opposition, the FAA
states.
Regardless, the FAA reports that steps can be taken
to improve the environmental review process. "While the
environmental review process may not be as long as some people may
perceive, it is a substantial component of the airport planning
process and merits consideration and adoption of streamlining
initiatives," the report states.
During her testimony and
in the report Garvey outlined some initiative currently underway
in FAA to enhance and streamline FAA's environmental performance.
They include:
- Establishing "EIS teams" for each new EIS required for
runway projects at major hubs. The FAA is also working to
strengthen these teams by adding more FAA members, asking
airport proprietors to contribute members, and adding EIS
consultants to the teams;
- Reallocating FAA resources to better staff EIS teams, and
finding ways to develop reimbursable funding arrangements for
airport proprietors to pay for additional FAA staff experts;
- Maximizing consultant resources to perform more EIS tasks;
- Streamlining the environmental review process by using more
categorical exclusions and shortening and streamlining EISs, as
well as Environmental Assessments/Findings of No Significant
Impact (EA/FONSI). The FAA's current proposal to expand the
categorical exclusion list is in its final stages, and the
streamlining effort for EISs and EA/FONSIs will begin this
summer in consultation with the Council on Environmental
Quality. The FAA also outlines specific ways to reform its EIS
practices;
- Improving interagency cooperation and coordination on
environmental reviews for airport projects and on the issuance
of environmental permits. The FAA plans to better engage other
agencies a the very beginning of an EIS, including the formation
of a Memorandum of Understanding between participating agencies
to outline roles and working relationships; and
- Compiling and issuing a guide to best practices for EIS
management and preparation.
The report includes a number
of "next steps" the FAA hopes to undertake to further improve the
environmental approval process. They include looking into
broadening the eligibility of airport revenue for the purposes of
environmental mitigation; airport funding of FAA EIS team
resources; and requesting legislative action to eliminate the
current requirement for a Governor's air and water quality
certification, given that such protections are covered under
federal statues. Bill Prohibits Use of Mobile Phone While Driving
Legislation has been
introduced in the House and Senate that would penalize states that
do not adopt laws restricting the use of mobile phones while
driving.
Sen. Jon Corzine (D-NJ) introduced S. 927, titled
the "Mobile Safety Act of 2001," on May 22, while a counterpart
version (H.R. 1837) was introduced in the House by Rep. Gary
Ackerman on May 15. Both bills direct the Secretary of
Transportation to withhold federal-aid funding from states that
fail to enact and enforce a law that prohibits individuals from
using a mobile telephone while operating a motor
vehicle.
Specifically, states in noncompliance would have 5
percent of their program withheld beginning in FY 2004, which
would increase to 10 percent beginning in FY 2005 and thereafter.
The legislation does allow for the use of phones if hands-free
devices are used or in cases of emergencies.
"While
legislating this behavior will not end all cell phone related
accidents, at least it's something" Ackerman said in a statement.
"If it saves one life or prevents one serious accident, the
measure is worth it. We don't want to take away drivers' cell
phones--just make them safe. We're confident of Congressional
passage and we call upon President Bush to support the
ban." Bill
Introduced to Study Reduction of Gasoline Blends
In response to increasing
gasoline prices, particularly in the Midwest, legislation has been
introduced in the House of Representatives that calls on the
Environmental Protection Agency to study reducing the number of
different gasoline blends available across the
country.
Reps. Mark Green (R-WI) and Paul Ryan (R-WI)
introduced the legislation on May 24, and it has 11 co-sponsors.
The bill (H.R. 2017) directs the EPA to look into whether the
creation of more uniformity among gasoline blends could help ease
supply problems and bring down prices. Green and Ryan indicate
that by reducing the number of different blends across the
country, supply crunches could be reduced.
The recent spike
in gasoline prices has been due in part to limited supplies of
reformulated gasoline, particularly in the Midwest. Green and Ryan
state that over 40 different blends of gasoline are used
nationwide, with nearly half of those distributed throughout the
Midwest. Refiners have claimed that producing boutique fuels for
different areas have constrained the supply of gasoline and have
subsequently driven up prices.
The two are hoping to secure
immediate consideration of the legislation. Under the bill, the
EPA study would have to be completed within four months. The study
must not only address the issue of fuel-type consolidation, but
also more specific issues such as meeting air quality standards
and using ethanol in any proposed Midwestern regional
blend. Freight
Trends Pose Major Transportation Challenges
A major escalation of trade,
both foreign and domestic, over the next two decades will pose
major challenges to all modes of transportation, and to the state
transportation departments responsible for maintaining the
nation's mobility, according to a series of speakers who briefed
the AASHTO Board of Directors May 21.
In a series of
presentations, freight experts and CEOs of state transportation
agencies outlined the steps they are taking to prepare for the
coming onslaught of trade through the development of intermodal
facilities, inland freight distribution centers, border crossing
improvements and other investments.
Freight Revolution
Already Underway "We are ten years into the greatest
social-economic revolution in history," declared luncheon speaker
Michael Gallis, a consultant specializing in integrated regional
land use and transportation strategies. Gallis outlined the
implications of that proposition for transportation decision
makers.
Using a series of visuals overlaying
transportation infrastructure and flows of freight traffic on
jurisdictional boundaries within states and regions, Gallis
elaborated on the difficulties of developing a "model of
multimodal transportation as a single integrated system."
"Do we have," Gallis asked the conference attendees, "a
system to the transportation system?" He contrasted the
difficulties encountered in the U.S. in trying to undertake major
transportation infrastructure projects with China's current
project to construct a 50,000 mile rail line to connect China with
Europe.
Based on his work in areas such as Connecticut,
Rhode Island and Detroit, Gallis illustrated the necessity of
understanding freight transportation demands and opportunities in
a global setting. He urged those involved with transportation to
understand their efforts in a broader and very different setting
than in the past. "We really are in a new century," said Gallis,
"but much of what we do is driven by what we have
done."
Key Link to Economic Development Henry
Hungerbeeler, Director of the Missouri Department of
Transportation, noted that transportation accounts for 11 percent
of the nation's gross national product, and consumes 19 percent of
the average household budget. He also noted that every dollar
invested in transportation produces between $2-$4 in benefits.
Substantial transportation investment programs have been initiated
in Illinois and Kansas, but were unsuccessful in the recent
legislative session in Missouri. He noted that the state has the
potential "to be an international transportation hub," but that
the transportation budget must be increased to address economic
development needs.
Citing one example of efficiency
improvements that can expedite freight movements, Hungerbeeler
said that delays of up to two weeks can be avoided through the use
of pre-inspected, pre-certified trains that can pass through the
Mexican border without delays.
Systems Approach Needed
for Freight Lance Grenzeback of Cambridge Systematics warned
that the nation is running out of transportation capacity, and as
a result productivity is deteriorating. In past decades improved
information systems and good transportation facilities have
enabled firms to drive down the costs of inventory, allowing huge
productivity gains through just-in-time delivery. He forecast
dramatic increases in freight tonnage by the year 2020, including
a 100 percent increase in the West, 89 percent in the Central and
South regions, and a 79 percent increase in the Northeast. "Do our
truck and rail systems have the capacity to handle this growing
volume?" he asked, adding 25 years ago the answer was yes, but
today the answer is unclear.
Grenzeback cited options to
address the needs including, among others:
- Strengthening the mandates of TEA-21 to address freight
issues;
- Providing strong federal leadership in identifying national
trends;
- Encouraging industry efforts to establish freight data
interchange standards;
- Making it easier for states to work together on regional
freight projects;
- Making rail infrastructure eligible for federal grants and
credits;
- Expanding the TEA-21 Borders and Corridors program;
- Adding a freight operations element to the National Dialogue
on Operations;
- Funding state and MPO freight specialists;
- Better integrating the public sector process for planning
and delivering freight improvements
- Establish a freight terminal and connectors program; and
- Expanding eligibility for freight infrastructure and
operations projects.
National Approach Needed to
Freight Issue Kam Movassaghi, Secretary of the Louisiana
Department of Transportation, noted that in 1998 freight traffic
totaled 9.8 billion tons, valued at $9.1 trillion. Forecasts
indicate that domestic freight traffic will increase by 87 percent
and international freight traffic will increase by 113 percent by
the year 2020. Trucking will dominate, with 68 percent of tonnage,
and 63 percent of ton-miles. Rail will transport 20 percent of
tonnage and 35 percent of ton miles. He stressed the need for
public awareness of the importance of trade, noting that "freight
issues have to be addressed nationally or regionally or we will
never solve the problems."
Movassaghi highlighted the
findings of the Latin America Trade and Transportation Study which
was designed to determine trade opportunities and identify
transportation investments needed to support trade growth. He
noted that by 2020 the tonnage of water trade is projected to
double, and land trade will quadruple between the U.S. and Latin
America.
He concluded that the highway system cannot handle
forecasted truck volumes, and that inland waterway and railroad
systems must be better used for long-haul freight and short-haul
bulk freight. He added that state and local elected officials and
the public must be educated on the importance of freight transport
to the economy. He also called for multi-state cooperation on
improving freight corridors, including waterways, rail lines and
highways.
Kansas City Inland Port Capitalizes on
NAFTA Noting that most Midwest traders are exporters, Doug
Luciani, Vice President of Transportation Energy and Environment
for the Greater Kansas City Chamber of Commerce, described trade
as posing a "competition not between cities, but between
countries." A recent "Mid-Continent TradeWay" feasibility study
identified Kansas City as an excellent location for an
international trade processing center. The Chamber has joined with
other groups in a SmartPort advocacy project to help develop
international trade processing in Kansas
City.
Redevelopment of the 1,500 acre former Air Force base
into the Richards-Gebaur International Freight Gateway Project has
provided a location to centralize seven major intermodal
facilities, providing "an opportunity to do intermodalism the
right way," he said.. Luciani added that his message to state
transportation officials was that "you can do this almost
anywhere." Further information on the Kansas City project can be
obtained at smartport@smartks.com.
States
Outline Freight Issues According to Mike Beherens, of the
Texas Department of Transportation, 17 percent of the current
truck traffic in Texas has been generated as a result of the North
American Free Trade Agreement. Some 50 percent of that additional
traffic is concentrated on two routes, he added. As a result of
expected trade growth over the next 20 years, the state has
embarked upon a $100 million study to examine possible new routes,
including such options as rail lines, exclusive truck lanes and
intermodal connectivity.
Beherens described current delays
in border crossings for trucks, noting that eight-mile backups
occur on I-35 leading into Mexico. New border crossing facilities
are being planned, but additional border infrastructure
improvements will be needed, he said.
Dwight Bower of the
Idaho Department of Transportation described the work of the
CANAMEX Corridor Coalition, noting that a five-state commission
has conducted hearings all along the corridor to develop a plan
for the high priority corridor designated in 1995 under the
National Highway System legislation. He noted that 1,500 new lane
miles, mostly in urban areas, will need to be constructed by 2030,
including such facilities as regional distribution centers,
telecommunications infrastructure and ITS installation. He said
that the plan will include bold initiatives such as a Smart
Freight Corridor and a Smart Tourist Corridor. With a cost of some
$6 billion, public and private partnerships will be needed to
build the corridor, as well as state commitments and international
cooperation.
Brent Felker of Caltrans described the state's
$5.3 billion program, employing 11,000 staff and 5,000
consultants. He said that the program will increase to $7 billion
next year. Stressing the need for energy conservation, he said
that the state's utility crisis provides a lesson to be learned
for transportation, that planning future infrastructure is
extremely important.
Despite energy woes, Felker said the
state's economy is still strong, with trucking having increased 71
percent since the enactment of NAFTA. He noted that $2 billion of
improvements are needed at border crossings. With container
traffic at the state's ports expected to triple over the next 20
years, Felker said that the state has a number of port initiatives
such as the Alameda Corridor East program, an expansion of the 26
mile freight corridor completed south of Los Angeles last year. He
also described the Global Gateways Development Program that will
include corridor improvements, surface improvements and
distribution centers to accommodate increased
trade. Transportation Ties to Agriculture, Recreation Examined
In light of the importance
of transportation to tourism, industry advocates are prepared to
support boosting federal funding in the coming reauthorization of
highways and transit, according to Derrick Crandall, President of
the American Recreation Council.
The role of transportation
in the economic sectors of tourism and agriculture were topics of
several briefings to the AASHTO Board of Directors at their
meeting in Wichita, Kansas, May 21.
Recreation Coalition
Eyes Reauthorization Crandall told the board that the nation's
$600 billion annual tourism industry provides 7.8 million jobs,
and ranks as one of the top three industries in every state. The
linkage between transportation and tourism was enhanced with the
creation of federal programs such as Transportation Enhancements,
Scenic Byways and Rails to Trails, he said. With the
reauthorization of federal highway and transit programs coming up
in 2003, Crandall sad that industry will shift its focus from the
advocacy of specific programs to support of overall increases to
the program as a whole. Crandall described a number of possible
options for cooperation, saying that the reauthorization will
provide opportunities to build partnerships and expand outreach,
as well as finding creative ways to boost funding beyond that
provided by the Highway Trust Fund.
Focusing on
transportation and tourism in Vermont, Brian Searles, Secretary of
the Vermont Agency of Transportation, said that the state's
biggest challenge is to resolve the clash between providing
appropriate development of transportation infrastructure and
retaining natural beauty. Tourism is an international business for
the state, responsible for $4 billion annually. He noted that the
transportation department had entered into a formal agreement of
cooperation with the department of tourism, and shares staff.
Because 80 percent of tourists travel by car, he said that the
state has eliminated roadside billboards, controlled development
at interchanges, and applied flexibility in bridge
design.
Agriculture Trends to Impact Transportation
Like its manufacturing counterpart, the agriculture industry is
also turning to just-in-time delivery of products, according to
Jon Meyer, of the North American Transportation & Logistics
division of the Excel Corporation. Meyer noted that 67 percent of
his firm's meat production is exported, and the need for immediacy
of deliver will steer the industry more to trucking shipments as
opposed to rail.
The motor carrier industry, he suggested,
is approaching a "Perfect Storm" beleaguered by rising fuel costs,
rising insurance costs, declining used truck values, declining
number of drivers and a downturn in the economy. He noted that 10
to 15 percent of the price of goods is determined by
transportation costs.
Discussing how state DOT's can
assist the industry, Meyer noted that safety, infrastructure
investment and adequate facilities are key interests, along with
uniform enforcement of regulations. He called for increased truck
weights, noting that heavier trucks would result in fewer trucks
on the highways, reducing congestion.
David Galt, Director
of the Montana Department of Transportation, stated that in light
of the increasing demands for freight transportation, it is
important that Congress continue the funding levels of TEA-21. He
described a state study conducted to evaluate the economic impact
of 80,000 pound trucks, and noted that Montana does change
trucking feels based upon configuration. With an annual export of
167 thousand bushels of wheat form Montana, Galt said that the
state is heavily reliant upon both rail and trucking
transportation. American Airlines Closer to Strike Countdown
Coming closer to a strike,
the board of the flight attendants union at American Airlines on
May 30 rejected binding arbitration.
A spokesperson for the
Association of Professional Flight Attendants said the board
unanimously rejected the offer made by federal mediators after the
breakdown last week of the latest round of talks over salary and
benefits.
Analysts predict that a settlement is still more
likely than a strike, but the union vote raised the possibility of
a walkout. More than 2,400 daily flights could be grounded at the
world's largest airline just as vacation travelers head out during
the busy Fourth of July holiday period.
With arbitration
rejected, the National Mediation Board said its next step will be
to declare a 30-day "cooling off" period before the union can go
on strike. Members have already authorized a job action. Union
officials said they expected the countdown period to start as soon
as Thursday.
American Airlines, a unit of Fort Worth,
Texas-based AMR Corp, released a statement that expressed its
disappointment, but was also prepared to meet at any time and
place to continue talks.
The airline said it had offered
the best overall flight attendant contract package in the
industry, including a 21.6 percent pay scale increase over six
years, a 3-percent signing bonus and profit sharing. However,
union President John Ward has said differences remain in core
economic issues of minimum pay, salary and health and life
insurance, with a gap of about $200 million between the union and
the company. NHTSA Reports Major Gains in Seat Belt Use in States with New
Primary Belt Laws
Seat belt use jumped in 2000
for three states that enacted primary belt use laws during the
year, according to newly released state statistics compiled by the
U.S. Department of Transportation's National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA).
States reporting the highest
estimated increase in shoulder belt use since 1999 were Alabama
(from 57.9 percent to 70.6 percent), New Jersey (from 63.3 percent
to 74.2 percent), and Michigan (from 70.1 percent to 83.5
percent).
"We are extremely gratified to see these
significant gains in seat belt use," said U.S. Transportation
Secretary Norman Y. Mineta. "Every day lives are being saved
through primary seat belt laws, and most recently through
legislation that became law last year in Alabama, New Jersey and
Michigan."
Seat belt use rates at or above the DOT's
desired performance goal of 85 percent belt use for 2000 were
reported by California (88.9 percent), Puerto Rico (87 percent),
New Mexico (86.6 percent), and Maryland (85 percent). The District
of Columbia, Hawaii, Michigan, North Carolina, Oregon and
Washington all reported use rates greater than 80 percent. The
lowest use rate reported was 47.7 percent in North
Dakota.
The latest state-by-state estimates of seat belt
use were derived from surveys conducted by state agencies in
accord with uniform NHTSA survey methods. Forty-eight states, the
District of Columbia and Puerto Rico reported to NHTSA on their
seat belt use rates for 2000. The newly released NHTSA statistics
are contained in a research note on the agency's web site at www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/ncsa/. Transportation Operation Issues
Studied
Public Technology Inc.
(PTI), a Washington DC-based non-profit organization and the
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) are conducting a study on
how transportation issues, operations and programs are managed by
local governments.
After completion and analysis, the
information will help FHWA assess the effectiveness and
applicability of national transportation programs at the local
level.
Concentrating on the areas of traffic control and
operations, ITS and other surveillance methods, and snow and ice
removal, the study will measure transportation operations and
management methods. To participate in the survey, visit http://www.pti.org/. Highway Subcommittee on Bridges and
Structures Meets
Implementation of the new
Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) bridge design
specifications, training and software were among the topics
covered in a four day meeting of the AASHTO Subcommittee on
Bridges and Structures held in Seattle on May 20-24.
With
400 registered attendees, all the member departments were
represented. Continuing their expedited on-site review process,
the subcommittee balloted many changes to a series of bridge
specifications at the meeting rather than using mail ballots after
the meeting.
Many timely and technically advanced
presentations were made, including a special lecture on seismic
retrofit of bridges in California. David Pope of Wyoming, the
subcommittee chair, was presented with a plaque by AASHTO for his
outstanding service over the last four
years. Nober,
Bertram to Join U.S. DOT
Roger Nober, General Counsel
for the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, and
Christopher Bertram, Senior Professional Staff Member for the
House Subcommittee on Highways and Transit, are leaving to join
the U.S. Department of Transportation.
Nober and Bertram
served as key staff members under then Chairman Bud Shuster (R-PA)
during the development and passage of TEA-21. During their tenure
they played major roles in gaining consensus on the bill and
subsequently protecting the funding guarantees included in
TEA-21.
Nober has joined the Office of the Secretary as
Senior Advisor to Deputy Secretary Michael Jackson. In his new
role, Nober will oversee a wide range of policy issues including
aviation, surface transportation, and future authorization
legislation.
Bertram has joined the Federal Aviation
Administration as Assistant Administrator for Budget and Financial
Management. There he will oversee the financial and accounting
activities of the agency, and will lead the effort in implementing
the FAA's new cost accounting
system.
| |