|
|
|
Prepared for the |
|
American Highway Users Alliance |
|
Seminar on |
|
Policies and Politics of User Fees |
|
|
|
A. E.
Pisarski | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A secure nation with a secure transportation
system |
|
Serving “high value” people and “high value”
goods |
|
Pursuing the “democratization of
mobility” |
|
|
|
We cannot meet these challenges with a backlog of
transportation investments undone |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
In the 2001 C&P report, FHWA reported
a backlog as of 2000 of: |
|
$271 billion of investment needed in
highways |
|
$55 billion in highway bridges |
|
AASHTO’s work shows the backlog will have
grown much higher by 2004 |
|
The backlog represent immense
opportunities lost, lives not saved, other benefits
foregone. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sustain an asset worth $1.5 Trillion. |
|
a 16% rate of return on investment |
|
Provided 15% of national productivity growth in the
last half of 20th century. |
|
38,000 jobs/billion$ |
|
Stimulates private investment |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Difficult period – Economy, Conflicts,
etc. |
|
Multiple transportation legislative
issues |
|
Aviation |
|
Amtrak |
|
Rail freight |
|
Maritime |
|
Possible temporizing
actions |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Not close to increase in last cycle (40%) |
|
Needs put at much greater than funding (maintain
18%-improve 65%) backlog $275-325b) |
|
Fed Gas tax at 18.4¢ doesn’t = 3¢ in
1956 |
|
Fed share of capital under 40 % |
|
Some opportunities regarding revenues |
|
Study new fuel effects |
|
Greater emphasis on “Innovative
Finance.” |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
“INNOVATIVE FINANCE |
|
AIN’T
MONEY” | |
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation Finance
Corporation |
|
Accelerated Spending |
|
New Money? |
|
Toll Roads |
|
HOV/HOT lanes - Premium service lanes |
|
Pricing |
|
Non fuel-based
funding | |
|
|
|
PROS |
|
Build sooner |
|
Private role |
|
User options |
|
Better service |
|
CONS |
|
Paying twice? |
|
Collection |
|
Dedication/Diversion |
|
Setting the
price |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Yes, I took Economics 101! |
|
This ain’t a marketplace! |
|
What is the goal? |
|
Who is in charge of the
price? |
|
The private sector? Amen – others – ? |
|
Public-private partnerships look very
public |
|
What are the signals for new
capacity? |
|
Are the pricers a new member of the
“Constituency for
Congestion”? | |
|
|
|
|
|
That sets the upper limit on fuel
fees. |
|
Without dedication there is no upper limit on
federal gas tax (see Europe). |
|
Feds very efficient tax collector |
|
Continued diversion ends support for new
fees. |
|
Let the gas tax
dwindle? | |
|
|
|
The “Post-Gas Tax Era” is not yet |
|
We must prepare for it but defend what we
have |
|
$1.8 billion per penny still has the power to
attracts sharks |
|
| |
|
|
|
Alan E. Pisarski |
|
|
|
PISARSKI@ALANPISARSKI.C0M |
|
703 941-4257 | |
|
|
|
SOME TIME DURING T-3 |
|
The nation will reach: |
|
300 Million Pop |
|
3 Trillion Vehicle Miles of Travel |
|
A MILLION VMT PER SQUARE MI.! |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
A common marketplace of 300 million over 3 million
square miles (3.7 with Alaska/Hawaii) |
|
A common labor market of 140 million jobs over the
same area |
|
A common language and culture |
|
2/3 of our households are home-owners |
|
Access to All World Markets |
|
A transportation system that ties it all
together |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CONTEXT |
|
Difficult times |
|
Other transportation issues |
|
Needs still exceed resources |
|
Delay? |
|
FINANCE |
|
Not close to 40% |
|
Require Study |
|
Some revenue options |
|
Emphasis on “Innovative
finance” | |
|
|
|
|
OPTION |
|
Travel Growth |
|
2.5¢ Gasohol to HTF |
|
5.3 ¢ Gasohol Increase |
|
reduce HTF reserves |
|
Regain HTF interest |
|
Indexing fuel rates |
|
ALL |
|
1¢ increase |
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUE/6 YEARS |
|
$17.6b |
|
$4.1b |
|
$8b |
|
$4.4b |
|
$2.6b |
|
$15.2b |
|
$51.9B |
|
$9.4b |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Our legacy from the last generation is wearing
thin |
|
|
|
What will we do to prepare for the next generation
? |
|
|
|
1980-1990 22 million new drivers added 40 seconds
to work travel time: 22.5 min. |
|
|
|
1990-2000 13 million new drivers and added 3
minutes: 25.5 min. |
|
| |