Legislative Update
March 10, 2002
Download in printable PDF format.
Bush Budget Request Honors the TEA-21
Funding Guarantees
On February 4, the Bush Administration released its Fiscal
Year 2003 budget proposal, which would fund the federal
transit program at $7.2 billion, the amount guaranteed in the
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21). The
Administration budget request acknowledges transit's high
ridership levels, as well as its role in reducing traffic
congestion. The budget proposes to fund two new programs: the
New Freedoms Initiative ($ 100 million for grants for
alternative methods to promote access to transportation, and
$45 million for a pilot program to promote innovative
transportation solutions for persons with disabilities); and
$6 million to support DOT efforts to coordinate delivery of
transportation services with environmental protections and
enhancements. As it did last year, the President's budget
proposes to reduce the federal matching share for new starts
projects to 50% beginning in FY 2004. The chart below shows
program funding levels.
Program |
FY 2002 Appropriation
(Millions)
|
FY
2003 Administration Budget Request (Millions) |
Change from FY 2002 Appropriations to
FY 2003 Budget Request |
Dollars (Millions) |
Percent |
Capital Investment |
2,841.0 |
3,036.0 |
195.0 |
6.9 % |
New Starts |
1,136.4 |
1,214.4 |
78.0 |
6.9 % |
Fixed Guideway Modernization |
1,136.4 |
1,214.4 |
78.0 |
6.9 % |
Bus and Bus Facilities |
(a) 568.2 |
607.2 |
246.8 |
6.9 % |
Formula Funds |
3,592.0 |
3,839.0 |
246.8 |
6.9 % |
Urbanized Area |
3,216.0 |
3,308.0 |
92.0 |
2.9 % |
Rural |
224.6 |
231.0 |
6.4 |
2.9 % |
Elderly and Disabled Persons |
84.6 |
87.0 |
2.4 |
2.9 % |
Clean Fuels |
(a) 50.0 |
50.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 % |
Winter Olympic/Paralympic Games |
5.0 |
--- |
- 5.0 |
-100.0 % |
Alaska Railroad |
4.8 |
4.8 |
0.0 |
0.0 % |
Over-the-Road Accessibility |
7.0 |
7.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 % |
Environmental Enhancement |
--- |
6.0 |
6.0 |
New |
New Freedom Initiative |
--- |
145.0 |
145.0 |
New |
Job Access and Reverse Commute |
125.0 |
150.0 |
25.0 |
20.0 % |
Planning and Research |
116.0 |
122.0 |
6.0 |
5.2 % |
University Transportation Centers |
6.0 |
6.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 % |
FTA Administration |
67.0 |
76.6 |
9.6 |
14.3 % |
Total |
6,747.0 |
7,229.6 |
482.6 |
7.2 % |
(a) Does not show $50 million Clean Fuels Formula Program
funds as transferred to Bus and Bus Facilities Capital
Investment Program in the FY 2002 Appropriations Law in order
to maintain comparability with FY 2003
Administration
Budget Request.
Negative RABA Hurts Highway Program
Funding, But Recovery Efforts Underway
The budget proposes an $8.6 billion reduction about 27
percent in highway funding for FY 2003. This decrease is based
on the Treasury's estimated decreases in Highway Trust Fund
revenues. The Revenue Aligned Budget Authority (RABA)
provision in TEA-21 requires highway funding to be adjusted
each year to reflect the most recent estimates of revenue
collections. In the last few years RABA has produced
substantial increases in highway funding levels in FY 2002,
RABA adjustments increased highway funding by $4.5 billion
above the TEA-21 baseline. For FY 2003, RABA adjustments would
produce a reduction of $4.4 billion below the authorized
baseline level. During recent congressional hearings on the
issue, there has been much discussion about how to minimize
the wide funding swings produced by RABA in the upcoming
reauthorization of TEA-21.
On February 7, just days after the release of the
President's budget, the Highway Funding Restoration Act (H. R.
3694 / S. 1917) was introduced. House Transportation &
Infrastructure Committee Chairman Don Young (R-AK) and Senate
Environment & Public Works Committee Chairman Jim Jeffords
(I-VT) introduced identical legislation in both the House and
Senate to restore highway funding to at least $27.7 billion in
FY 2003. Currently, there are 280 cosponsors in the House and
58 in the Senate. State and local officials expressed their
strong support for the legislation at a February 28 Highways
and Transit Subcommittee hearing, calling it critical to
economic recovery in the states. In a February 25 letter to
the White House, APTA and seven other partners supported a
restoration of such funds.
Congressional Recess
The U. S. House and Senate will recess for two weeks,
beginning March 22. While your Representatives and Senators
are in their districts, we urge you to invite them to visit
your business or transit property. The recess ends on April 8
when Congress returns to Washington.
New Legislation
Senator Baucus Addresses Gasohol
Taxes
Introduced by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus
(D-MT) on March 1, S. 1979, the Energy Tax Incentives Act of
2002, covers a wide range of energy and fuel issues. Included
in the bill are provisions to transfer 2.5 cents of the
gasohol tax, which currently goes to deficit reduction, into
the Highway Trust Fund.
Streamlining Legislation from
Transportation & Infrastructure Committee
T& I Committee staff have drafted a bill, to be called
the Expediting Project Delivery to Improve Transportation and
the Environment Act, also known as the ExPDITE Act, that would
streamline highway and transit project delivery. The draft
bill is being circulated for comment prior to introduction in
the House of Representatives. Many of the concepts in the bill
have been recommended by industry groups including APTA and
DOT agencies. The transit and highway provisions include:
-
Provisions that guide a project through the NEPA process,
including designation of DOT as the lead agency for highway
and transit projects; other interested agencies would be
designated as participating agencies and would be responsive
to the lead agency.
-
DOT would be required to keep projects on a schedule with
standards and milestones for agency comments, comment
periods with deadlines which agencies must meet, and
Congressional notification when deadlines are not met.
-
Section 4( f): This historic and parkland preservation
provision predates NEPA and most environmental laws and
would be amended to spell out specific protection standards.
-
DOT would survey and report to Congress on interagency
cooperation on highway and transit projects.
-
The Secretary would develop a comprehensive program to
stimulate program management and oversight.
-
Drug and Alcohol Testing: Transit providers covered by
more than one testing program would be subject to the
testing program of only one DOT agency.
-
Grants Processing: Would allow transit grant recipients
under the Rural Formula program or the Elderly and Disabled
program, who receive grants under the Discretionary Bus and
Bus Facilities program or the
Job Access and Reverse
Commute program, to administer those grants under the
standards of their regular formula program.
-
Bus Procurements: A pilot program would be established
allowing transit agencies to purchase large transit buses
using the General Services Administration's purchasing
schedule.
Rail Issues: TRAIN 21 and Amtrak
Representative Clement Circulates Dear
Colleague Letter on TRAIN 21
Congressman Bob Clement (D-TN), Ranking Member on the House
Railroads Subcommittee, has written to all members of the U.
S. House of Representatives requesting their endorsement and
cosponsorship of H. R. 2654, the Transit Rail Accommodation
Improvement & Needs Act for the 21st Century. Congressman
Clement indicates that this legislation "presents a common
sense process to resolve a growing number of disputes between
freight railroads and mass transportation authorities". APTA
strongly supports this legislation, and an APTA letter of
endorsement was attached to Representative Clement's
letter.
Railroads Subcommittee Hears From Amtrak
Reform Council
On February 14, the House Railroads Subcommittee held a
hearing to examine the Amtrak Reform Council (ARC)
recommedations for the restructuring of Amtrak. The ARC
restructuring plan, released on February 7,
focuses on
three components: a new business model for Amtrak, the option
to introduce competition, and a proposal to gain secure
funding sources. The report also discusses the ideas of a
passenger rail trust fund and infrastructure financing through
federal tax-credit bonds.
Following the hearing, both Transportation &
Infrastructure Chairman Don Young (R-AK) and Railroads
Subcommittee Chairman Jack Quinn (R-NY) shared their thoughts
on the matter. Young, who testified before the Subcommittee,
criticized Amtrak for complacency since the 1997 Amtrak Reform
and Accountability Act, which set out expectations for the
agency's eventual self-sufficiency. He praised the ARC for its
work and analysis. Quinn, however, adopted a different tone,
noting that "as lawmakers, (we) must clearly define our
expectations of passenger rail service in this country." Quinn
called for a thorough examination of the issue of passenger
rail, adding that "if Congress continues to turn a blind eye
to Amtrak, we face the prospect of disintegration of passenger
rail service."
McCain Legislation Would Restructure
Amtrak
On February 15, Senator John McCain (R-AZ), the Ranking
Member of the Senate Commerce Committee, introduced S. 1958,
the Rail Passenger Service Improvement Act. Following are some
of the key provisions of this complex and comprehensive bill:
-
Amtrak would be split into three for-profit businesses:
Amtrak operations, Amtrak maintenance, and Intercity Rail
Operations.
-
Each subsidiary would be privatized within four years.
States would have the flexibility to use funds from the
Highway Trust Fund and Mass Transit Account for intercity
rail.
-
Funds would be authorized to improve the Northeast
Corridor. Safety and security needs can be 100% federally
funded, but other improvements would need a minimum 20%
match from states. Amtrak would have to surrender its long
term lease of the Northeast Corridor as a requirement of
receiving any federal funding.
-
A new board (the Amtrak Control Board) would be appointed
by the President to direct Amtrak's operational
restructuring, to approve budgets, and oversee
privitization. This would be in addition to the current
Amtrak Board, which would continue to exist.
-
U. S. DOT would award franchise rights to provide
passenger rail service. The passenger operator would need to
demonstrate that it has negotiated the necessary access
agreements or is actively engaged in good faith
negotiations. Further, the operator would need to
demonstrate that the award of a passenger rail franchise
would not downgrade the service of a freight operator or its
ability to serve its customors. (This contrasts with current
law, which puts the burden of proof on the freight
operator).
-
To administer this program the bill would create an
Office of Rail Passenger Development with FRA. Until now
such issues have been under the Surface Transportation
Board, and prior to that the ICC.
Hollings to Introduce Alternative Amtrak
Bill
On March 6, Senate Commerce Chairman Ernest F. Hollings
(D-SC) introduced S. 1991, a bill to finance Amtrak for the
next five years. According to an aide, the bill is the first
of a two-step process, first deciding on the shape of a
passenger rail system and then deciding how to fund it. The
bill would authorize $4.6 billion in annual funding and would
retain Amtrak as the operator of all national passenger
service. His proposal would make the Northeast Corridor a
separate financial unit under Amtrak and direct all of its
operating profits to be reinvested in the corridor and not go
to subsidize outside routes. It would fund billions of dollars
in postponed maintenance and capital needs on the corridor.
Long-distance routes would receive a separate, $580 million
annual budget. Below are some of the key provisions of
anticipated legislation:
-
The Northeast Corridor would get $1.31 billion annually,
all for capital projects including expected growth. The bill
expects that ticket revenues would cover operating expenses.
-
$1.55 billion annually would go to the development of
other high-speed corridors across the country.
-
Long-distance trains would receive $580 million annually,
with $360 million designated specifically for operating
expenses.
-
$270 million would go toward state-supported routes and
short-distance routes.
-
$1.3 billion would be authorized for rail security,
including life-safety upgrades in the rail tunnels in
Baltimore and New York, and preliminary design work for
tunnels to replace the 125-year-old ones leading into
Baltimore from its south..
-
Expansion of the Railroad Rehabilitation and Financing
Program, providing $35 billion in loans and loan guarantees.
Amtrak Submits Legislative & Grant
Proposal for FY 2003
Amtrak has asked Congress for $1.2 billion in FY 2002,
double the budget proposed by the Bush Administration. Amtrak
has stated that this will "preserve options and avoid further
long-term harm to the system while policy-makers consider the
future of the passenger rail system." Amtrak identified a
number of issues it would like to consider in the
reauthorization process including a long-term source of
funding; high-speed corridor development; excess Railroad
Retirement; wholesale purchase of electric power; passenger
train priority enforcement; tax exemption for Amtrak-leased
lines; and removal of litigation from state to federal court.
Also proposed for this year's legislative agenda is Amtrak
common stock, and rail security legislation.
Amtrak Leadership Changes
On Friday, February 22 the Amtrak Board unanimously elected
John Robert Smith to be the new Chairman of Amtrak. Michael
Dukakis, who had been serving as Acting Chairman since the
departure from the Board of former Wisconsin Governor Tommy
Thompson, will continue to serve as Vice Chairman. John Robert
Smith has served on the Amtrak Board since June 1998, and is
the mayor of Meridian, Mississippi. On March 7, Amtrak
President and CEO George Warrington announced he will soon
resign to become Executive Director of NJ Transit after
serving at Amtrak for four years.
For further information about any issues in the APTA
Washington Report, please contact Genesee C. Adkins at (202)
496-4810 or at gadkins@apta.com.
Contacting Members of Congress
Mail deliveries to Congress are still subject to
delay. E-mail is an effective way to make sure your
message to Congress is received in a timely fashion.
To e-mail Members of Congress
-
Go to http://www.apta.com/
-
Click on "Government Affairs"
-
Then click on "Congressional Information"
-
Then click on "Members of Congress." Follow the
directions for e-mail and fax addresses of Members of
Congress. You can also send an e-mail message directly
from the
site. |