I Write on Behalf of the American Public
Transportation Association (APTA) to Express Our Concern About
Recent Efforts to Reduce the Federal Match on Transit New
Start Projects
July 2, 2001
The Honorable Daniel K. Akaka
141 Hart Senate Office
Building
United States Senate
Washington, DC
20510-1103
Dear Senator Akaka:
I write on behalf of the 1400 member organizations of the
American Public Transportation Association (APTA) to express
our concern about recent efforts to reduce the federal match
on transit new start projects.
The House Appropriations Committee included language on
this issue in the committee report (H. Rept. 107-108)
accompanying the FY 2002 Department of Transportation and
Related Agencies Appropriations bill (H.R. 2299). Report
language states that: "although the maximum federal
contribution remains at 80 percent, …… the Committee is very
supportive of requiring local sponsors to increase their
contributions to projects so that the federal share is no
greater than 60 percent." It goes on to state that the
Committee "intends to base its future budget decisions on
whether or not communities have raised their financial
commitment to cover at least forty percent of a project’s
total capital costs."
In addition, the Administration’s FY 2002 budget request
includes a recommendation to reduce the federal match for
transit new starts from the current 80% to 50%, beginning in
FY 2004.
APTA strongly disagrees with efforts to establish a federal
match for transit capital projects that is lower than the
match for highway capital projects. Simply put, local
decisions should be based on local needs and concerns, not on
the basis of which program offers the highest federal share.
Federal policy should promote balanced transportation
decision-making; a differential federal share is contrary to
such balance. The decision to use one transportation solution
or another should be based on which project best meets the
needs of the community, and not on which is eligible for the
highest federal share.
The House Committee report asserts that the reduction in
the match for transit projects is necessary because the
"demand has too quickly outstripped available resources" and
that reducing the match would allow Congress to fund more
projects by better leveraging increased local funding. While
we agree that there is great demand for new start projects in
communities across the nation, we note that the Transportation
Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA 21) authorizes
an additional $430 million in FY 2002, which is not
appropriated in the House-passed bill, for new start funding.
Nationally, transit use has increased by 21% over the last
five years, faster than the growth of vehicle miles traveled
(VMT) or air travel. Rising energy costs and traffic
congestion in metropolitan areas has further fueled the demand
for more and better public transit service. We strongly
believe that transit can and should be an important part of
our national transportation system. We respectfully ask that
you encourage more, not less, investment in our public
transportation infrastructure and that you reject efforts to
reduce the federal share on new start transit projects.
If you have questions on this or other public
transportation issues, please call on me or contact Rob Healy
(202-496-4811, rhealy@apta.com) or Tom
Yedinak (202-496-4865, tyedinak@apta.com) of my
Government Affairs Staff. Thank you for consideration of
APTA’s views.
Sincerely yours,
William W. Millar
President
WWM/ked