National Trust for Historic Preservation - Click here to return to the Home Page

Join the National
Trust
Donate to the
National Trust
Preservation Week
National Preservation
Awards
Volunteer
Opportunities
Corporate Partners
State and Local
Partnerships
Issues and Initiatives
Advocate Better
Policies
Legislative Action
Center
Preservation Advocate
News
Join the National Trust
Help from the National Trust
The National Trust in Your State
Contact the National Trust
National Trust Home Page

 


Advocate Better Policies

Preservation Advocate News
June 26, 2001, Vol. 7, Issue 5

horizontal line

IN THIS ISSUE:

Feature Stories:

Legislative Updates:

Announcements:

FEATURE STORIES:

CONGRESS PASSES FY''02 BUDGET RESOLUTION AND PRESIDENT SIGNS RECORD TAX CUT INTO LAW; "HISTORIC HOMEOWNERSHIP ASSISTANCE ACT" INTRODUCED IN SENATE

Congress passed a budget resolution (H.Con. Res. 83) prior to the Memorial Day recess that increases discretionary spending by 4.2% for fiscal year 2002 and President Bush signed the largest tax cut in 20 years ($1.35 trillion over 11 years) on June 7. However, despite the best efforts of preservationists, the historic homeownership tax credit was not included in the final tax bill signed by the President.

Senator John Breaux (D-LA) introduced the "Historic Homeownership Assistance Act" (S. 920) in the Senate on May 21. Senators Lincoln Chafee (R-RI), Bob Graham (D-FL), James Jeffords (I-VT), Tim Johnson (D-SD), Carl Levin (D-MI), Robert Torricelli, (D-NJ), Zell Miller (D-GA) and Max Cleland (D-GA) have co-sponsored the bill to date. Breaux has also circulated a "Dear Colleague" letter in the Senate to gain support for the bill.

Another Round of Tax Cuts?

Now that the Bush tax cut is in place, attention has turned to the next opportunity to win approval of a broad array of tax reductions and other incentives that were not included in the first major tax bill. However, the defection of Sen. James Jeffords (I-VT) from the Republican party and the resulting change in leadership and control of the Senate to the Democrats will have an effect on the consideration of any future tax cuts this year. Before the change in control of the Senate, the speculation was that a minimum wage bill would be the likely vehicle for passing tax items outside the President's plan, such as the historic homeownership tax credit. Business and corporate lobbying interests played up the idea that the minimum wage bill was going to be the legislative vehicle for a second round of tax cuts. However, the ascendancy of the Democrats to the majority and the continuing flack over an organizational resolution in the Senate threaten to derail any serious negotiations over a second tax package, which would likely require 60 votes to ensure it against a potential filibuster. In addition, Congressional lawmakers are also beginning to publicly question the validity of the budget surplus projections in the wake of the passage of the first tax cut, which provided the impetus for even considering a second round of tax cuts. While there is ample evidence to think that a second round of tax cuts may be a possibility, the goal for preservation advocates, in the interim, is to gain as many sponsors of the "Historic Homeownership Assistance Act" (H.R. 1172/S. 920) as possible.

Action Needed

Advocates should urge their Members of Congress to co-sponsor the "Historic Homeownership Assistance Act" (H.R. 1172/S. 920). Visit the National Trust's Congressional Advocacy Center to view our alert on the homeownership tax credit and see if your Member of Congress is a cosponsor of either the House or Senate bill. Our goal is to reach 218 sponsors in the House and 51 in the Senate. If your Member is not a cosponsor, we urge you to write or call your representative or Senators (use the US Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121) and ask for his or her support for the bill. You can also use our Congressional Advocacy Center from the National Trust's home page to compose letters of support for the historic homeownership tax credit to send directly to your Members of Congress via e-mail by simply typing your zip code into the "Take Action" box.


Back to the top of this page

"SAVE AMERICA'S TREASURES" PROGRAM (SAT) FUNDING RESTORED IN ADMINISTRATION'S BUDGET AMENDMENT TO CONGRESS

President Bush submitted an amendment to his FY'02 to Congress on May 7 requesting $30 million for the "Save America's Treasures" (SAT) program from the Historic Preservation Fund (HPF). The Administration's budget amendment revises its total request for the HPF to $67.055 million in FY'02. The Bush budget that was delivered to Congress on April 9 had zeroed out SAT funding and left the future of the program in limbo. Preservationists were pleased to hear of this policy reversal and rejoiced at the prospect that SAT program may finally be garnering the respect it deserves in order to continue receiving annual funding. Since its inception in 1999, the SAT program has identified almost $3 billion of unmet need in funding for historic preservation projects.

The Bush budget amendment also included new language that requires "all projects to be funded shall be approved by the Secretary of the Interior in consultation with the President's Committee on the Arts and Humanities prior to the commitment of grant funds." The President's Committee on the Arts and Humanities was created by executive order in 1982. Individual projects would still be eligible to receive only one grant under the program.

House Passes FY'02 Interior Bill

The House passed the FY'02 Interior Appropriations Bill (H.R. 2217, H. Rept. 107-103) by a vote of 376-32 on June 21. The House bill includes $77 million for the Historic Preservation Fund, with $30 million for the "Save America's Treasures" program and $5 million for the National Trust to create a one-time "Historic Sites Fund" to address emergency maintenance and repairs at the Trust's 20 historic sites. However, the States and tribal preservation programs received $39 million and $3 million, respectively -- considerably less than their FY'01 funding. The States were cut $7.495 million and the tribes lost $2.56 million from last year. Overall, the HPF was reduced by $17.139 million from FY'01.

The Senate is expected to mark up of the Interior Bill after the July 4th congressional recess. Continued pressure and advocacy will be needed to ensure that Senate appropriators retain funding for the Save America's Treasures Program and the National Trust's Historic Sites Fund, as well as restore cuts in funding levels for the States and tribes passed by the House. Stay tuned for breaking developments and alerts on appropriations in the coming weeks.

Back to the top of this page

LEGISLATIVE NEWS

Rahall Amendment on National Monuments Passes House
Rep. Nick Rahall (D-WV) sponsored an amendment to the FY'02 Interior Appropriations bill which prohibits the expenditure of funds -- for any pre-leasing or leasing activities under either the Mineral Leasing Act and the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act -- in national monuments created by various Presidents since passage of the Antiquities Act in 1906. The Rahall amendment was a victory for advocates of both natural resource conservation and cultural resource protection in national monuments. The Rahall amendment passed the House on June 21 by a vote of 242 to 173.

Back to the top of this page

 

National Monument Fairness Act of 2001 (H.R. 2114)
Rep. Mike Simpson (R-ID) introduced H.R. 2114 on June 7 that would gut the Antiquities Act of 1906. The bill's fatal flaw is a provision that "sunsets" all new national monuments over 50,000 acres within two years of designation unless Congress approves the designation, leaving such lands subject to development threats. The Act has given the President the unique authority to protect public lands from imminent and irreparable harm and has been used judiciously since 1906. Case in point: all but three Presidents have made use of the Antiquities Act to protect the special qualities of our federal lands from potential harm. Since the passage of the Antiquities Act of 1906, over one hundred national monuments have been designated. The National Trust opposes any efforts to weaken the Antiquities Act, as well as any efforts to undercut protections afforded America's newest national monuments and any future monument declarations.

Back to the top of this page

Post Office Community Partnership Act of 2001 (H.R. 1861, S. 897)
Senator Max Baucus (D-MT) and Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) introduced legislation on May 16 that would require the U.S. Postal Service to extend procedures regarding the closing or consolidation of a post office to the relocation or construction of a post office. In addition to outlining a 60-day notification requirement for community contact procedures, the bill also requires the Postal Service to comply with any applicable zoning, planning, or land use laws (including design guidelines, building codes, and all other provisions of law) in considering post office closings, consolidations and relocations. Preservationists have been battling to keep post offices located in their downtown areas for years to help preserve community character and prevent urban sprawl. Senators Wayne Allard (R-CO), James Jeffords (R-VT), Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Carl Levin (D-MI) joined Senator Baucus as cosponsors of S. 897. S. 897 has been referred to the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs and H.R. 1861 was referred to the Committee on Government Reform.

Back to the top of this page


Historically Women's Public Colleges or Universities Historic Building Restoration and Preservation Act (H.R. 1623)
Introduced by Rep. Charles Pickering (R-MS), H.R. 1623 would authorize $16 million annually for five years from the HPF for matching grants to preserve and restore historic buildings and structures located on the campuses of the nation's historically women's public colleges. The bill would earmark $2 million each to the following eight women's colleges in FY'02 : Mississippi University for Women in Columbus, Mississippi; Georgia College and State University in Milledgeville, Georgia; University of North Carolina in Greensboro, North Carolina; Winthrop University in Rock Hill, South Carolina; University of Montevallo in Montevallo, Alabama; Texas Woman's University in Denton, Texas; University of Science and Arts of Oklahoma in Chickasha, Oklahoma; and Wesleyan College in Macon, Georgia. The bill requires historically women's colleges to a minimum 50 percent match of federal funding which can include in-kind contributions. The bill was introduced on April 26 and referred to the House Committee on Resources and the Subcommittee on National Parks, Recreation and Public Lands on May 3.

Back to the top of this page


Historically Black Colleges and Universities Reauthorization (H.R. 1606)
Introduced by Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-SC), H.R. 1606 would amend the "Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996" to authorize significantly more funding for the preservation of historic structures located on the campuses of the nation's 103 historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs). The Omnibus Parks bill initially authorized HBCUs funding at $29 million, which expired at the end of fiscal year 2001. The Clyburn bill would authorize $530 million for HBCUs and require only a 30% match. H.R. 1606 was introduced on April 26 and referred to the House Committee on Resources. It was subsequently referred to the House Subcommittee on National Parks, Recreation and Public Lands on May 2.

Back to the top of this page


Brownfields (S. 350)
Brownfields legislation (S. 350) passed the Senate by a vote of 99-0 on April 25. Many brownfield sites contain older and historic commercial structures that would be eligible for cleanup and assessment funding under the Senate-passed bill. A draft version of a House brownfields bill is being circulated by Rep. Paul Gillmor (R-OH) which is purportedly more restrictive of the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) ability to intervene in state-supervised brownfields cleanups than S. 350. At issue is the notion of "finality" -- the point at which parties who develop brownfield sites are free from future liability. Gillmor, the chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Environment and Hazardous Materials, believes that S. 350, as passed by the Senate, falls short of adequately restricting EPA's authority and wants to see a stronger guarantee of "finality". Gillmor has a strong ally in the National Governors Association, which issued a statement saying that "S. 350 gives way too much discretion to EPA." NGA wants more specific conditions under which EPA can override a state cleanup certification -- otherwise "brownfields will continue to go undeveloped." Gillmor's draft bill attempts to provide an "assurance of finality" to state cleanup authorities, developers and investors that the federal government will only intervene in a cleanup under very limited circumstances, such as when contamination has migrated or will migrate across a state line. Gillmor's draft bill would authorize $1 billion over 5 years ($200 million annually - the same level as the Senate bill) but would reserve $50 million annually for "petroleum-related cleanups". The Gillmor draft bill would also make "more seriously contaminated sites" eligible for brownfields program money and would streamline the federal permit process for brownfield cleanups. Gillmor's Subcommittee on Environment and Hazardous Materials has scheduled a hearing on S. 350 and the House draft bill on June 27.

Back to the top of this page


"Rebuilding America's Infrastructure" (H.R. 1564).
Introduced by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), H.R. 1564 would authorize $50 billion annually for mortgage loans at 0% interest so that State and local governments can invest in certain infrastructure projects, including rehabilitation. The bill's lending guidelines would require at least 20% of all loans made to states, local governments and Indian reservations be invested in public school infrastructure and facilities or other public educational facilities. Although the bill, does not define clearly "public school infrastructure" (for example, new construction vs. rehab work), the National Trust is monitoring the bill as a potential funding source for rehabilitation of older and historic neighborhood schools. H.R. 1564 does cite State departments of education data identifying at least $300 billion in unmet school infrastructure needs. H.R. 1564 was introduced on April 24 and referred to the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, the Committee on Budget and the Financial Services Committee. The bill was subsequently referred to the subcommittees on Aviation, Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation, Railroads, and Water Resources and the Environment on April 25.

Back to the top of this page


"Constitutional Land Acquisition Act" (H.R. 1592)
Introduced by Rep. Mac Thornberry (R-TX), H.R. 1592 would amend Title I of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 to protect the rights of an owner of non-Federal real property located within boundaries of a Federal unit as a consequence of the acquisition of lands for that unit, or adjacent to Federal lands acquired with amounts made available under the '65 Act. The bill would amend the Act to include "property acquisition requirements" that must be met in order to complete a Federal acquisition, including the consent of the owner and specific approval by an Act of Congress. The property rights restrictions placed on LWCF acquisitions would be significant under H.R. 1592 and could pose a problem for the federal government in setting aside public lands for natural conservation, historic and cultural resource protection purposes. H.R. 1592 was introduced on April 25 and referred to the House Committee on Resources.

Back to the top of this page

ANNOUNCEMENTS AND SHORT TAKES

Mainella Named Director of National Park Service

Fran Mainella was named Director of the National Park Service by President Bush on June 4. Mainella previously served as the Director of the Division of Recreation and Parks for the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and has over 30 years of experience in the field of parks and recreation. Mainella's previous public service experience includes being president of the National Association of State Park Directors and the National Recreation and Park Association, as well as secretary of Florida A & M University's Landscape Design and Management Program's Advisory Council. Mainella also served as the Outdoor Recreational State Liaison Officer for the state of Florida and was responsible for administering Land and Water Conservation Fund grants. She is a current member of the Florida Tourism Commission and the statewide Eco-Tourism/Heritage Tourism Committee.

As Director of Florida's state parks, Mainella administered and oversaw the management of 153 state parks consisting of more than 500,000 acres. Her supervision of eight bureaus, two offices, and over 1000 employees led to many accomplishments for the Florida Park Service. In 1999, at the National Recreation and Park Association Annual Congress meeting in Nashville, Tennessee, the National Sporting Goods Association awarded the prestigious "State Parks Gold Medal" to Florida's state park system, recognizing it as the best state park system in all 50 states.
Mainella's confirmation hearing before the Senate Energy Committee will take place on June 27.


National Trust Advisors' Meeting Washington a Major Success

The National Trust's Board of Advisors held their biannual meeting in Washington, D.C. May 19-21, which culminated with a special day of lobbying on Capitol Hill on May 22 to help advocate for the Trust's public policy agenda with their individual Members of Congress. By all accounts the meetings and lobbying efforts were a major success. Advisors went to Capitol Hill and lobbied for passage of the historic homeownership tax credit, a $5 million historic sites fund for the National Trust's 20 historic sites, full funding ($150 million) for the Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) and the national preservation program, and post office legislation. Kudos to Gordon Kerr and Stacey Mahaney in Public Policy and Margaret Welsh of the Trust's Resource Center for a terrific job in organizing the myriad of activities that the Advisors enjoyed.

Transportation Enhancements News

Reauthorization of ISTEA and TEA-21 won't begin in earnest until early in 2003 (it's the 108th Congress that will reauthorize TEA-21), but the Administration and most of the transportation advocacy groups are already preparing their wish lists and developing strategies to achieve them. In the meantime, below are the latest developments on the transportation and historic preservation front.

  • The National Trust has an updated version of a now classic book on the transportation enhancements program. Building on the Past, Travelling to the Future: A Preservationists Guide to the Federal Transportation Enhancements Program, Second Edition has arrived from the printer and is being widely distributed. We want historic preservation projects to win a larger share of transportation enhancements funds, which amount to over $600 million per year and, in most states, the historic preservation share of the program is too low. The updated version of this book is packed with practical information about ways to plan successful projects and contains many inspirational project examples. Contact Stacey Mahaney in the Public Policy Department at (202) 588-6255 to obtain your copy of the book or write to policy@nthp.org.

  • The National Trust is about to embark on a major study for the Federal Transit Administration on historic preservation's contributions to transit centers and transit-oriented development. Transit ridership is growing, and interest in transit solutions to traffic congestion has never been greater.

  • In September, the National Trust and the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, the professional association of state transportation agencies, will hold the first historic preservation and transportation conference. Next year, the Trust's Rural Heritage Program will be hosting its third national Saving Historic Roads conference. The Trust's regional offices, our statewide partners, the Law and Public Policy departments, and rural heritage are all increasingly involved helping local communities all over the country deal with state transportation agencies as they work to protect and enhance their historic resources. For further information about these activities or general transportation enhancements program questions, contact Dan Costello in the Public Policy Department at (202) 588-6167 or write to mailto:dan_costello@nthp.org.

Back to the top of this page

 

Preservation Advocate News is published by the National Trust's Department of Public Policy and distributed via e-mail to its grass roots advocacy network. For further information contact: National Trust for Historic Preservation, Department of Public Policy, 1785 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20036, 202-588-6254 (phone), 202-588-6038 (fax), policy@nthp.org (e-mail). To sign up directly for e-mail delivery, visit the National Trust's Congressional Advocacy Center at http://capwiz.com/nthp/home.

Richard Moe, President
Kathryn Higgins, Vice President for Public Policy
Gordon Kerr, Director of Federal Relations
Staff Writers: Carl Wolf, Dan Costello

 

Why Preserve | Get Involved | Historic Places | Community Building | Historic Travel | Books and Gifts | Search | Site Map | Home
© 2003 National Trust for Historic Preservation. All rights reserved.  Terms of Use | Privacy Statement