 |
"We need to ask, much more critically, about each piece
of highway construction or expansion: What will it really
achieve? Could we use the money better—for transit…or for
subsidizing housing so that moderate-income folks don’t feel
forced to move to less expensive, far-out
suburbs?" —Neal R. Peirce, Washington Post Writers
Group |
"The work-bound traveler of 1950, even 1900, had more
transportation options than does the ultramodern,
cell-phone-equipped millennial commuter of today." —Jim
Motavalli, author of Breaking Gridlock
As traffic and smog continue to degrade quality of life for
millions of Americans, visionary communities are turning to
alternative transportation choices, such as modern commuter trains,
clean bus lines, vanpools, bike paths and safe sidewalks to improve
quality of life. By focusing on moving people rather than autos,
these communities are pulling commuters out of traffic jams by
giving them more choices in how they get to work.
Unfortunately, many of our public officials continue to support
an unbalanced approach to transportation planning. Expensive and
inefficient transportation projects that offer only a short-term
solution receive the lion's share of taxpayer funding. These
projects gobble up our farmland and natural open spaces, increase
smog, promote poorly planned, sprawling developments, and often
increase the traffic problems they are supposed to fix.
This map samples some of the best and worst transportation
projects in America. From simple community-based initiatives to
large-scale projects with billion-dollar budgets, it is a glimpse of
what is happening with transportation planning in America. It shows
the many different approaches we can take to solve our
transportation challenges and the vastly different directions our
planning can take us.
Transportation Choices Improve
Quality of Life
Runaway, haphazard development—which brings more roads, more
traffic and more pollution—is not inevitable. One of the best ways
to curb sprawl is through wise transportation planning and
investments. By balancing funding between highways and public
transportation choices, such as rail, buses, bike paths and
sidewalks, we can:
Reduce air and water pollution
Reduce traffic congestion and gridlock
Promote energy conservation and resource efficiency
Protect open space, farmland and fish and wildlife habitat
Help downtown businesses thrive
Enhance the quality, distinctiveness, vitality and livability of
our communities
Americans Want Better
Transportation Choices
Spending money on public transportation is a good investment that
responds to public demand. Americans are increasingly turning to
public transportation. The public wants a clean environment and more
public transportation choices—it is up to federal, state and local
governments to provide these options.
Since 1995, transit ridership has grown by 21 percent.
More than 14 million people use public transportation on a
typical weekday.
In 1999, transit ridership topped more than 9 billion trips, the
highest level in nearly 40 years.
Source: http://www.apta.com/
According to a National Association of Realtors poll conducted by
Public Opinion Strategies in September 2001, most commuters are
willing to try transportation alternatives if they are convenient,
safe and accessible.
Transportation Alternatives Americans Want:
65% Car pool, ride sharing, or van
pool 62% Rail or train 57% Combination of
public bus, rail and train 52% Public bus Source: National Association of Realtors Poll,
09/2001 |
More Highways Are Not the
Answer to Congestion
Recent studies show that building or widening highways invites
more traffic, a phenomenon called “induced traffic.” Shortly after
the new lanes or road is opened, public transit or carpool riders
switch to driving. Motorists decide to take longer and more frequent
trips or switch routes to take advantage of the new capacity on the
roadway.
As the new/expanded roadway stimulates more development away from
core cities and suburbs, motorists move farther from work and
shopping. Often, induced traffic eats up 50 to 100 percent of the
roadway’s new capacity. After a few years, the “new” roadway has
once again reached full capacity, and created extra traffic on the
local streets at both ends of the trip.

Over-Dependence on Highways Harms
Communities
Short-sighted transportation planning and investments that rely
on highway construction to the neglect of other transportation
choices traps people in their cars and pollutes the environment.
Over-dependence on highways hurts communities by:
Polluting our air and water
Increasing congestion and gridlock
Wasting gas and energy
Eating up open space, farmland and habitat
Increasing commute times and distances
Lowering the local tax base
Shifting businesses from downtown
Limiting commuter choices
Leaving behind those who can’t or don’t drive (students,
seniors, people without cars)
Reducing options and safety of pedestrians and bikers
Sprawl and lack of transportation choices force people to own and
drive cars in order to reach most destinations. The average American
driver spends 443 hours per year—the equivalent of 55 eight-hour
work days—behind the wheel.
Source: 1997 USDOT Report, "Our Nation’s Travel
Infrastructure needs arising from sprawling development cost
American households an average of $630 per year. Transportation is
the second biggest household cost for American families, more than
food, education or healthcare.
Source: http://www.transact.org/report.asp?id=36
Residents of sprawling communities drive three to four times more
than those living in efficient, well-planned areas and can waste up
to three to four times more energy from driving than people who live
in better-planned, efficient cities that offer more transportation
choices.
Source: http://www.environmentaldefense.org/
While roadways for autos continue to be expanded, there has not
been a corresponding increase in safe and convenient pedestrian
walkways, making it more difficult and dangerous for people to walk.
Between 1986 and 1995, approximately 6,000 pedestrians were killed
each year in the U.S. by automobiles. For every pedestrian killed by
a car, another 15 were injured.
"Wide roads have been built without sidewalks or frequent
crosswalks, and high-speed traffic makes these roadways particularly
deadly. In many areas, intersections with crosswalks may be as much
as a half-mile apart, leaving pedestrians with no safe way to cross
the street."
Source: "Mean Streets 2000," Surface
Transportation Policy Project, http://www.transact.org/

Unbalanced Transportation
Spending Feeds Sprawl and Pollution
The federal transportation bill, called the Transportation Equity
Act for the 21st Century, appropriates over $217 billion, but it
spends five times as much on highways as on public transportation.
A single track of rail moves as many people as a six lane
highway during rush hour.
For every $5 that is spent on highways, only $1 is spent on
public transit.
Air Quality and Transportation
Smog is a serious public health threat. Twenty percent of
Americans live in areas where doctors and scientists say the air is
not safe to breathe. Exposure to smog can trigger or cause a range
of illnesses and conditions, from asthma to pneumonia. According to
the EPA, over 50 percent of all cancers that are attributed to
outdoor air toxics can be traced back to the toxics released from
mobile sources such as cars, trucks and SUVs.
Our reliance on cars and trucks has led to severe air pollution
problems and a significant public health threat. Giving people more
transportation choices can dramatically lower automobile use,
reducing air pollution and the accompanying effects on public
health.
Providing more transportation choices during the 1996 Olympics
reduced traffic by 22 percent, air pollution by 28 percent and
asthma attacks by up to 42 percent.

Solutions
By better balancing transportation spending between roads and
less-polluting public transportation, like rail transit and clean
buses, we can reduce the number of miles people have to drive,
provide Americans with more transportation choices, and better
reflect America’s priorities for a clean environment, good health
and enhanced quality of life.
In order to protect our communities and clean our air, water and
environment, transportation policy should:
Make significantly greater investments in clean public
transportation.
Improve walking and bicycling facilities around shopping and
parks, and implement traffic calming measures.
Build more affordable housing near transit and job centers.
Promote and support regional and statewide planning that
combines transportation, land use and environmental planning.
Support public involvement in the transportation and land use
planning process.
Fund innovative incentive-based programs for encouraging
alternative transportation use, such as tax credits for public
transit, walking or biking, parking cash-out and parking fees.
Press Release Read the Sierra Club Press Release - July 30, 2002
Acknowledgements
This project was made possible through the hard work of many
Sierra Club volunteers and staff, including:
CHALLENGE TO SPRAWL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE: Neha Bhatt Melody
Flowers Tim Frank Nat Garrett Ed Hopkins John
Holtzclaw Cynthia Hoyle Brett Hulsey Richard Klein Greg
LeRoy Bill Myers Judy Kunofsky David Sullivan Peter
Tyler
Project Coordinator: Neha Bhatt
Design: John Byrne Barry
Research: Jenna Musselman, Neha
Bhatt, Melody Flowers, John Holtzclaw Communication Consultants:
Nat Garrett, Allen Mattison Field Research and Editorial
Assistance: Bonnie Bick, Glen Brand, Russell Butz, Chase Davis, Pat
Dezern, Roger Diedrich, Peggie Griffin, Brian Hager, Marc Heileson,
Gary Lauerman, Erika Kreider, Melanie Mayock, Jeremy Marin, Tancred
Miller, Nat Mund, James Wamsley, Rosemary Wehnes, Cynthia
Wentworth Cover Photo by Barrie Rokeach
This report was funded by a grant from The Sierra Club
Foundation.
Photo courtesy National Renewable Energy
Laboratory.
Up
to
Top |