![]()
Issue 383 September 16, 2002
|
But the mass transit links
underpinning that relationship are inadequate. Planners know this,
but have been hitherto unable to bring the problem to the fore, in part
because of the problem of forging a bi-state approach to solving it.
Compare the transit lines crossing the Hudson to those crossing the East
and Harlem Rivers. Sixteen sets of subway tracks run under or
over the latter. Only two cross the Hudson. New Jersey
commuter trains are linked by a single tunnel to Penn Station NY.
That is also currently true of the Long Island Railroad, but the lower
level of the 63rd Street tunnel is available for commuter rail
access, and the LIRR East Side Access project is on its way to connecting
it to Grand Central Terminal. There is also more infrastructure
flexibility in Metro-North’s access to Manhattan. If there was room
at Penn Station, Metro-North’s Hudson Line could serve it in short order
via the bridge at Spuyten Duyvil and Amtrak’s West Side line.
Likewise, only Penn Station constraints prevent New Haven line trains from
using Amtrak’s Hell Gate route to reach the West Side. MTA
projects and planning are moving forward to realize these
potentials. But even without these
improvements, the commuter lines east and north of the city could still
serve Manhattan in a crisis that affected Midtown because many of their
smaller stations in the Bronx, Queens and Brooklyn permit easy
transfers to the vast, flexible subway system. If Penn Station
were disabled, that would simply not be the case for commuters from New
Jersey – rush hour PATH trains operated close enough to capacity before
September 11 that a big influx of NJ Transit riders could not fit into
that system. Crisis
and redundancy planning aside, demand for rail access from New Jersey to
Manhattan is growing. NJ Transit projects in the works for years are
significantly increasing the capacity for one-seat or easy two-seat
Manhattan trips, but they are running up against the Hudson tunnel/Penn
Station bottleneck. Senators Torricelli and Corzine say a second
commuter rail tunnel from NJ to Manhattan will be their top priority
in next year’s federal transportation reauthorization. New York’s
Congressional delegation should also back the project. For all the
talk about building LIRR and Metro-North links downtown, it is more
important for the city’s overall economy to ensure that it gets easier for
New Jersey workers to reach Manhattan. |
![]() |
MTR #383 portable document format (PDF) file version (requires Adobe Acrobat). Related Articles and Links U.S. Lawmakers All Over the Map on New Hudson Tunnel (June 17, 2002) Downtown LIRR
Advocates Take Aim at Subway Tunnel MTR search facility and back issues: Search our database of all past issues of Mobilizing the Region since Fall, 1994. Go to index of all Mobilizing the Region back issues |