Skip banner Home   Sources   How Do I?   Site Map   What's New   Help  
Search Terms: fuel , economy, standards
  FOCUS™    
Edit Search
Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed   Previous Document Document 487 of 803. Next Document

Copyright 2001 The Atlanta Constitution  
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

October 5, 2001 Friday, Home Edition

SECTION: Editorial; Pg. 20A

LENGTH: 568 words

HEADLINE: OUR OPINIONS: Decrease appetite for oil, foreign and domestic

SOURCE: AJC

BODY:
This is a can-do country. Historically, Americans have achieved just about anything we put our minds to.

It's time we put our minds to energy independence.

It probably has not escaped your notice that the global hotbeds of anti-American, Islamic extremism are precisely the same areas of the world containing much of the known reserves of oil. It certainly has not escaped the attention of American-connected oil companies. Since the war on terror was declared in the aftermath of Sept. 11, companies in those hot spots have been on alert, preparing evacuation plans.

In the last several years, more and more American oil workers have found themselves in the Middle East and Central Asia, where companies began investing more heavily as production peaked in the North Sea, Gulf of Mexico, Alaska and other less-hostile zones. The potential disruptions to those supplies now are myriad, ranging from terror attacks on international oil workers, to sabotage of pipelines to an Islamist takeover of Saudi Arabia or other key oil states.

Instability of supply and resulting price spikes are likely for many years to come, presenting a long-term threat to our economy and our energy-intensive way of life.

The precariousness of our position can hardly be overstated. Although our nation consumes about 25 percent of the world's oil production, we have only about 3 percent of the world's proven reserves. Until the post-terror slump, consumption had been growing rapidly, with vehicle fuel economy dropping to levels not seen since 1980.

Many in Congress have recognized the danger. Some have pushed to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and other protected lands to oil drilling. Even if we put aside environmental concerns, such a move wouldn't come close to solving the problem. In the long run, burning through our tiny oil supply faster will not make our country more secure.

The nation needs a long-range energy plan not just to reduce our dependence on foreign oil --- though that is important --- but to reduce our over-reliance on oil generally. Our future security demands a rapid shift to more diverse fuel sources and greater efficiency.

Passenger cars use more than 40 percent of the oil consumed here, so a good place to start would be raising fuel-economy standards. Increasing average efficiency to 40 miles per gallon over the next 10 years would save 50 million barrels of oil a year, 15 times more than the likely yield of ANWR, according to the National Resources Defense Council. With tax and other incentives to spur the growth in gas-electric hybrids, the average could be raised to 55 miles per gallon.

But beyond that, we should undertake an aggressive effort to bring to market the next generation of engine technology --- fuel cells that run on hydrogen and emit water vapor. A mass conversion from carbon to hydrogen and to ultra-efficient technologies in the coming years could develop a new, dynamic sector of the economy, at the same time it makes our economy less vulnerable to those who hate us.

It also becomes increasingly urgent to grow in less automobile-dependent ways. This merely means borrowing from our past to create places that are compact, walkable and served by multiple modes of transportation.

In the new reality, adopting technologies and habits that conserve energy isn't just a personal virtue. It's an act of patriotism.

GRAPHIC: Photo:
Some automakers are marketing gas-electric hybrid engines that could raise efficiency to 55 miles per gallon. / Toyota

LOAD-DATE: October 05, 2001




Previous Document Document 487 of 803. Next Document
Terms & Conditions   Privacy   Copyright © 2004 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.