Skip banner Home   Sources   How Do I?   Site Map   What's New   Help  
Search Terms: fuel, efficiency, standards
  FOCUS™    
Edit Search
Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed   Previous Document Document 537 of 739. Next Document

Copyright 2001 Journal Sentinel Inc.  
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (Wisconsin)

July 27, 2001 Friday FINAL EDITION

SECTION: NEWS; Pg. 14A

LENGTH: 192 words

HEADLINE: ENERGY POLICY;
House should reject terrible measure

BODY:
Next week, Rep. Thomas M. Barrett (D-Wis.) and others in the House will consider the Cheney energy plan. Although deceptively billed as a balanced package, the measure is in fact full of giveaways to big energy companies; it lacks meaningful advances in energy efficiency and renewables.

Its provisions include: Oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge; a car and SUV fuel efficiency increase of less than 1%, which is smaller than the standard automakers are already voluntarily using; $13 billion in subsidies for coal, one of the biggest air polluters; a $23 billion windfall for the oil industry, despite record profits; $2.7 billion in nuclear industry subsidies; restrictions on federal ability to protect public lands; a dangerous nuclear technology that risks weapons proliferation; no significant efficiency standard boost for appliances such as air conditioners; a fossil fuel emphasis that raises the threat of global warming; and no guaranteed, significant increase in clean, renewable energy use.

Let's hope Barrett will see through the greenwash and oppose this terrible bill.

P.J. DeMarco

Wauwatosa

LOAD-DATE: July 27, 2001




Previous Document Document 537 of 739. Next Document
Terms & Conditions   Privacy   Copyright © 2004 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.